Ok, so this is the OP (EnzoUk).
After writing this thread and replying, I came back the next day to find that I couldn't login anymore so presumably my account was deleted. I did email an admin and got no response. I do find it a little odd that such an innocuous thread seems to have got me banned. Perhaps someone didn't like one of my replies (although if you read back I was always polite), but it does beg the question, if someone disagreed with anything I said to the point where they wanted me silenced then is their argument really so strong and are they simply unwilling to admit some truths?
With that said, I have been able to read through the replies and it's nice to know that some women here have admitted they have seen such behavior as I described and disapprove of it (i.e. men merely being shamed for trying to interact with a woman based on his appearance in a way which an attractive man wouldn't be...the only difference being the superficial appearance).
That Tinder link did make me question certain things and it does expose a harsh truth for a lot of men I think (i.e. that women will often treat them very differently based on their appearance alone). In that experiment the guy could act in a way which practically any woman (or any person) would say was presumptuous, arrogant, even a bit 'creepy' and the women still responded positively. Similar experiments have been done many times over where I found this link and the results were the same. By the way online dating is used to start a very high % of relationships these days so it is not all about sex and understandably men are saddened when they do see things like this experiment which suggest that looks conquer all. Yes, I expect that men also have this horribly superficial reaction too because it is backed up by science (aka the halo effect). I saw an OkCupid link where when asked to rate someone's personality by their looks - the less attractive someone was, the less personable they were thought to be - it was an exact match.
The problem though I think lies in the ease of which women can generally get intimate relationships with the opposite sex compared to men. The fact is that there are a much greater amount of men who as someone said above are 'incel' (i.e. involuntary celibate) and simply do not get sexual interest from the opposite sex based on their physical makeup. Men who are not in the top say 20-30% of looks absolutely have to approach women in social interactions in an attempt to improve their dating lives, otherwise they simply go without. They aren't going to get any success on tinder or OkCupid (as can be seen by stats, women get far more messages than men in general and women will put up with almost any behaviour to be with the best looking men). So if they have to initiate an interaction with a woman then (looking at the replies here), they simply will be called creepy and shamed for doing so. A little unfair some might say. I think some posters here have been very reasonable (i.e. the ones who have admitted they have seen and disapprove of this type of shaming, or the ones who don't mind a guy's approach and simply offer a polite rejection when not interested) but others here seem to think it is absolutely abominable that a man who is not in some way beautiful would dare approach them. This I think is the type of attitude too which adds to problems between the sexes. I imagine that the man who has been rejected and subjected to cruel taunts about his appearance by women he has approached later ends up with a lot less respect for the opposite sex based on his experiences.
Having said all of the above, I do also think that there are men out there who are so clueless as to spoil it for others.. i.e. the guys who are genuine pests, who intrude and get physical without any hint of an invitation and refuse to go away without any real conversation back. I can see why some women get irritated by this enough to snap at the next guy who is a lot more restrained in his advances, but still I do not accept that it is ok to be rude from the outset.
To the posters here who are absolutely rude ('F off...', 'Any guy who thinks he has the right to approach me on a night out can pss off...), I say that like the guys who are pests and let their gender down, you also let yours down. Why? Because rather than even attempting to understand things from the point of view of the opposite sex (as men should try to also), what you really want is absolute control....control to be rude if you want, control to shame a man if you want and control to shamelessly react very positively to the poor mannered 'hot' guy while telling others in your daily life how 'creepy' men can be. Some of you casually admit that you couldn't care less if the very average looking man doesn't have much dating success...but then would you feel the same way in future if that happens to be your son or other close relative? Maybe your hatred does even extend that far. I don't know. One thing I have noticed on my very short time in reading this forum is that there is a lot of anger. Some of that anger I'm sure is very justified...women I know have to put up with a lot of sht...i have three sisters and a girlfriend. It p*sses me off too if I hear some guy sleaze over them without any control. But some of the anger here seems way beyond this too and I do wonder, if you are simply going to ban anyone who offers a different perspective whether you are in danger of becoming your own worst enemies. Who knows, that isn't my concern.
I just wish that people in general could be a bit more respectful to each other and consider the other's point of view.