Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

The optional nature of men's lives

411 replies

cailindana · 24/01/2015 12:35

I was talking about this with DH recently and he agreed with much of what I said.

It strikes me that boys and men have very "optional" lives in comparison to girls and women and that this influences their whole approach to life. What I mean is, girls learn pretty early on that their choices will be restricted, that their options will be limited. From only being allowed to wear skirts and then told they mustn't show their knickers (thus removing the option to be active) to suddenly having to deal with periods and curtailing activities due to that, to then contending with the prospect of unwanted pregnancy and thus having restrictions on sexuality to then being told not to walk certain places not to do certain things for fear of being attacked and ultimately being told you "can't have it all" - ie choose work or children.

IMO, women (in general of course, not all) learn very quickly that there are consequences to things, that you can't always have what you want, that sometimes you just have to get on with it and face the fact that everything isn't perfect. I think that influences their approach to so many things in life from housework, to illness, to childrearing. Men on the other hand, always seem to have options open to them and I think that leads to a certain immaturity, a lack of acceptance that sometimes you can't have what you want. I think it has a bearing on how men approach things like fatherhood and the idea that now you don't have any choice but to knuckle down and accept your life is different - so many men seem to want to "opt out" and carry on as if nothing is different, thus leaving women to, as usual, take the hard road.

While I don't think it's right that women often end up carrying the burden I'm not sure it's necessarily a bad thing to have that maturity foisted on you. I think while women do lose out massively in the earlier years, especially when children are young, that maturity and that acceptance stands them in very good stead as they get older and ultimately they reap the rewards. I notice among older friends that women seem to come into their own in their 50s whereas men can't face that their options are now becoming limited and they no longer have the world open to them - hence mid-life crises etc. I think also because men expect options they tend to skirt on the edges of responsibility, never full accepting the hardship of, for example, parenthood, and thus ending up on the fringes as children get older and become true friends and companions. Thus women, who have been the stable guiding force in childhood, mucking in, organising, being the go-to person, reap the rewards of a close relationship with their adult children, whereas men, who focused on work, never really got their hands dirty with parenting, are now coming to retirement and the loss of that source of status but have not really jumped in with both feet in family life and so don't have that either. They are left with very little.

I am not saying the equality that exists is a good thing. What I'm saying I suppose is that while women look on enviously at men continuing their careers and never attending a parents' evening, they might do well to remember that the emotional toil and labour they put into their families is really and truly worth something. Jobs come and go, they give no love or longterm support. But children are for life, and being that person who always knows where the PE kit is is important, is special.

Men are missing out. They just don't realise that until it's too late.

OP posts:
FloraFox · 26/01/2015 23:09

I don't need to look at the Law Society's website to see how many women partners there are because the eyes in my head can clearly see the paucity of women partners in the City. That isn't even the whole story because neither my eyes nor the Law Society will tell me how many of the women partners are income / de-equitised partners even though I know women are disproportionately income / de-equitised.

I do realise that in some other places the number of women may be higher than in the City but I wouldn't hold out Edinburgh as a model of diversity. Not by a long shot.

FloraFox · 26/01/2015 23:14

Your husband's job hours sound horrendous but that is for you and your husband to sort out.

That's rubbish. These are structural / cultural issues that cannot be devolved to individuals to "sort out".

I have worked in Scandinavian countries where men and women take responsibilities for child care which means in private enterprises, every day someone (male or female) stands up and says "I'm leaving to get the kids" at a reasonable hour. They have excellent daycare and very few people SAH or use nannies. We can't, as individual families, sort this our ourselves.

PhaedraIsMyName · 26/01/2015 23:19

If two men are stupid enough to say that in a social situation the hiring consequences may well rebound on them.

It shows a lack of business savvy. They have no way of knowing who might get to hear of it or to whom they were speaking.

PhaedraIsMyName · 26/01/2015 23:24

Flora It can be sorted out by not having a job which makes such demands. Not all jobs demand 24 hour / constant travel/ stress. Most don't.

YonicScrewdriver · 26/01/2015 23:25

They might rebound, but there's a good chance they won't.
Or at least that they'll never know they have (when Petula recommends that a protege of hers doesn't even bother to apply there, for example)

PhaedraIsMyName · 26/01/2015 23:34

I actually meant consequences for their company's services being hired. If they tender for say local government work and that got back to someone on the procurement panel.

It might sound far fetched but rumour has it the least obvious site for the Holyrood parliament and which was eventually picked is down to 2 civil servants gossiping on a train about possible locations , a surveyor over hearing it and punting his client's site.

Flora do you have any experience of working in or dealing with law firms in the Central Belt?

FloraFox · 26/01/2015 23:41

Flora It can be sorted out by not having a job which makes such demands. Not all jobs demand 24 hour / constant travel/ stress. Most don't.

All you're saying is that women cannot have access to jobs that have been designed to be inaccessible to women. And this is their responsibility and not affect by cultural or societal factors.

When I stared in my job, the hours and commitments required to make it to partnership were far less than they are today. There were far fewer women (or lower class types) in the running. It does seem that the spread of "meritocracy" has changed the ground rules for success which now requires excessive presenteeism.

PhaedraIsMyName · 26/01/2015 23:51

I would have said "presenteeism" was a feature of the Thatcherite days. When I started work offices closed for lunch. Literally closed the door between 1 and 2 and phones ( which all went through a central switchboard) weren't answered. How quaint that seems.

Presenteeism , as far as I can tell has really gone out of favour.

There will be occasions when late hours are required to meet a specific deadline but making a regular thing is saying either you're not coping or you're not delegating properly. Neither is going to win brownie points.

FloraFox · 26/01/2015 23:51

phaedra I have a little experience of firms in the central belt. They have not struck me as beacons of diversity.

FloraFox · 26/01/2015 23:55

phaedra I don't deny your experience of your work but it is nothing like the experience of working on the City. Presenteeism has not gone out of favour and long hour are baked into the business model. The idea that working long hours would be perceived as a sign of failure or frankly laughable.

FloraFox · 26/01/2015 23:55

"Is" not "or"

PhaedraIsMyName · 27/01/2015 00:04

Flora I'm not denying what you say isn't true of London city firms but London city firms , which are probably billing a trainee at a higher rate than me in the sticks, aren't the whole of the legal profession in the UK.

Constantly working extra long hours is not seen as a good thing.

TheSubjugatedDad · 27/01/2015 02:11

Hello all, really long first post coming up.

I'm a father, and I thought I'd share my experience. I've not read the whole thread, only the first few pages, so excuse me if this is not relevant to the current flow of the thread.

Yops, in the first page, said something that struck a chord with me. I've been reading feminist books and forums for a while, since it's an interest, and am aware of the concept of 'lived experience' and how important it is that men know that they cannot possibly understand fully the 'lived experience/oppression' that women face. Yops asked that vis-à-vis, how can women feel they are able to comment on men's experiences? As such, I hope to share my experience of being a father; my 'lived experience', and hope you'll accept it in the way that you would like yours to be.

I recognise the behaviour in men that the OP talked about. I know men like that, but don’t think I have been like that myself (though I have come close, as I will explain). I think that men are disadvantaged in parenting, oppressed even, in much the same way women are in work. I can’t say whether this is ‘patriarchy’, because my experience of it has been that it is mostly women doing the oppressing. Albeit, unconsciously and without malice.

When I had my first child with my ex wife, I felt from the pregnancy that I was not an equal parent. Back then, there was very little focus on the father when attending medical appointments or ante-natal classes, and when together with my wife, all questions from friends/relatives/health visitors/etc seemed directed at her rather than ‘us’.

My first wife breastfed our son, and cherished the experience. I was happy for her to breastfeed, although I looked forward to him moving onto formula because I wanted to feed him too. A year later, it became clear to me that the decision to continue breastfeeding was equal shares convenience/health benefits for child/that nice feeling the mother got from it. I figured at the time that it was no big deal, I can bond in other ways/etc, and that breastfeeding is a good thing anyway. Later, I resented the mother’s emotional satisfaction having been part of the decision when my wants/desires weren’t even considered.

I was very eager to put the baby to sleep, bathe him, hold him, clean him up, etc... but although both myself and my ex wife were equally inexperienced (first child), it always seemed that she felt she knew how to do these things best and that I needed correcting. I wanted to learn it on my own. I was doing it right anyway. But there was interference from my ex wife at every step that made me feel like I should be the second choice for any caring related task, like a substitute in a football match.
At first, I thought that maybe this was just a personality trait of my wife. But her mother did the same thing when she was around the house. Even my own mother did! As did my wife’s friends, and even one of my own female friends! It was although it was common knowledge that men are useless. I’ve spoke to many father’s about this since, and they experienced the very same things.
Our son fell ill and was admitted to hospital. Both my wife and I were there constantly until he was discharged. A couple of days later, a doctor called to make sure we had received a prescription that he needed to be adjusted. There were a couple of calls related to this. Our house phone was always on speaker phone for some reason (wife’s choice, dunno why), and I can tell you that the way the hospital staff dealt with me was different to how they dealt with my ex wife. With her, the conversation was instant and automatic, with me, there was a pause and hesitation as though to say “Have we got the right number?” or “Oughtn’t I speak to the mother”.

There were other issues that I’ll touch upon when I talk about my current marriage and my daughter, but I’ll add one other thing. When we got divorced, it was pretty amicable but we both wanted full custody of our son. We both worked part time in well paying jobs, and had both been at home for equal amounts of the week prior to the divorce. She got full custody. Why? I don’t know. She’s a good mother, no doubt, but I’m a good father too. In court, it really all seemed to start from the position of “Ok... so the mother’s getting full custody, but let’s hear the father out and decide how much he gets.”. There really wasn’t the sense that the case was starting from a 50/50 balance. Of course, all this was dressed up as ‘We only consider the best interests of the child’. I now see my son once a fortnight ? for the weekend. When I remarried, my ex wife was bitter and made things difficult with that, too.

Anyway. In my current marriage, things were much the same to begin with as my previous marriage. The whole issue of the mother being seen as automatically being best at care, remained. Although we didn’t have the issue with breastfeeding since our daughter was formula fed (wife didn’t want to breastfeed). I must say I cherished feeding my daughter.

There are other things. I am undermined when it comes to discipline, for example. I am undermined when it comes to educational decisions such as what school to choose. It’s all subtle. Much like a mature discussion, but there seems to be an unspoken expectation that mother knows best. I voice my opinion, she voices her, but more than 50% of the time it’s her decision that happens. When the school calls, they ask to speak to Mrs.TSD. When I explain I’m her dad and they can talk to me, they are totally fine, but why the assumption?

I’ve typed loads, so the details are getting more concise. But my point is that in my experience as a father, I have been consistently made to feel that my care is second class to a mother’s care, and that my opinion in decisions relating to my child are second class to the mother’s. Nobody would ever admit this and everyone would agree it’s wrong, but it happens, and it’s a similar sort of unspoken prejudice that makes a man more likely to pass an interview for a highly paid job than a women.
Besides this treatment of fathers by women. There are also societal issues that are at work that make it hard for fathers. For example, when my son was born I was only entitled to 2 weeks paternity leave. I wanted more. I wanted the same as my wife got. I managed to book a few extra weeks on top of the statutory two, but I lost out on the opportunity to be there at home with my newborn as much as my wife was. When my ex wife went back to work, she found it hard emotionally to leave her child at home when she had to work. I didn’t say it, but I thought “I’ve had to do that from almost the beginning!”.
The 2 weeks entitlement that men got was reflective of the attitudes towards fathers in the workplace. When I need to leave early to attend to something child-related, I’m allowed because my employer seeks to comply with equality legislation, but I can tell you it is certainly more frowned upon than when one of the mother’s does the same thing. All unspoken of course.

Anyway, I should relate this to the thread. I think that when you have a situation where fathers are made to feel like they are second class parents by the women around them, where in the workplace it is the expectation that a father just does not have to suddenly leave because their child is ill, and where it seems to be automatically assumed in custody cases that the mother will have primary custody by default... then men develop a kind of learned helplessness. Much as we see some women going along with patriarchal expectations of femininity and the woman’s role for the sake of having an easier life with less hassle, so too we see father’s thinking “If everyone thinks all I’m good for is earning money, then I might as well get on with it”.

It’s a crisis I think, amongst men, as to what their role is in the home. Once, there were clearly defined roles; he earned the money, she raised the children. That’s terrible of course, and I’m happy women now have it better than they did. But now, since women can earn and live independently of men; yet there still seems to be the attitude that they are also still better at being parents. Where does that leave men? For some, it results in disengagement.

I think the solution is for is to move towards a total 50/50 split with maternity/paternity leave, for a start. I know the legislation has now changed so that father’s can have more time off than ever before, but it’s still not equal as it depends on the --permission—compliance of the mother to return to work herself. I think that if we had equal leave, then over time it would go some way to becoming the norm in the workplace for men to be seen as equal parents, and likewise, women as equal workers (many other things need to be done too of course).

Secondly, they need to be putting some kind of safeguards in place to ensure that custody arrangements are more equal. I would generally expect more mothers to be granted primary custody simply because more of them are currently oppressed into a position where they are better able to care for the child (more likely to be working part time, etc). But even so, I get the feeling that the figures are still unequal even when you take this into account, and put it down to it being a cultural idea that women are obviously the ones who are better suited to having primary custody.
Finally, women need to be aware of the effect they have on the father and how what they do might damage or inhibit the engagement of the father with his child. With regards to all aspects of caring for a child, do you patronise him? Do you woman-splain things to him? Do you interfere or take over when it’s not really necessary? Etc.

So that’s my ‘lived experience’. I know a lot of men share it. Go easy on me!

EBearhug · 27/01/2015 02:16

Presenteeism is still alive and well outside of the legal profession. In some ways, it's worse, because modern technology means not only do we have the flexibility to work in other locations besides our desks - but it becomes expected, so leaving at 16:00 to collect the children is possible, but it might mean you put in a few hours of work in the evening, too, and never really get a break.

It's not like that for everyone, but if you're in a department/company where it's become the norm, it can be hard to be the one to stand up and say, I'm not doing this, particularly if you're not senior, because it will go against you in many cases.

DadWasHere · 27/01/2015 04:17

Yes cream but how often is it that the mother doesn't get involved? It does happen, of course, but because society expects mothers to be involved there isn't that option for women to switch off - schools, relatives, friends etc expect them to know the minutiae of their children's lives, whereas men can be called a "good dad" and still hardly know a single detail of their children's lives.

I agree with what you say about 'good dad'. But, in light of what Subjugated said, if I rephrased part of what you wrote into a question: "What do you call a dad who knows the minutiae of his children's lives?" The answer would not be a 'great dad', sadly, the answer would be 'creepy'. I was far more fortunate than him by the sound of it, my wife and I were very much invested co-parents, and we alternated the time we took off work to care for our kids. But that whole negative social vibe he talks about, I felt that clear as day myself.

In essence your 'good dad' is a known quantity and so you can deal with it even as you deride it, but opposite that is the problem that excellence troubles many people.

creambun2014 · 27/01/2015 04:57

This must have been a very long time ago subjugated. It is creepy a man knowing about his children! Shock What an odd idea.

My own Dh is 30 but looks about 25. He has never had this issue and we have 3 children and he cares for a 4th frequently who is my friends child. Even though he looks young everyone takes him seriously. I think it is because he is clearly capable of caring for many children and not a bumbling dad type who faffs about.

When he is out with all 4 (2 are aged under 1). He does get the whole wow you are impressive, but no judgement.

It might come from when we had our first many years ago he just got on with it. All mail goes to dh from school. The only time I have attended a post birth visit dh held the baby and the health visitor spoke to him. He is primary carer and had attended other meetings/knew the health visitor so definitely wasnt seen as strange.

Anyway off out now as 1 and half hour commute this morning.

cailindana · 27/01/2015 09:31

'Creepy' DWH? Really?? Who thinks that? The SAHDs who come to my toddler group tend to be patronised at first, but once it's clear they know what they're doing they're considered "great" and given far more credit than the women who do exactly the same thing. One of my closest friends was a SAHD (now back at work) and does most of the day to day stuff for his DC. He did really struggle at the start - there was a definite assumption that he didn't know what he was doing, and he didn't actually know what he was doing, given that up till he became a SAHD he used the "I work" excuse to be a stereotypical 'good dad' - but once he became more confident and made a few SAHP friends he just became accepted as the default parent, in exactly the same way as happens to women.
Since my own DH became more involved with our children I would say my respect and love for him has increased massively. I always did love him but now I feel like we're on the same team, pulling together, rather than on opposing teams trying to find some common ground. I value his involvement, in fact I literally begged for it. It took him a long time to hear me though.

Thank you for sharing your experiences TSD. I am shocked that an involved, keen parent could end up with only fortnightly access - was there any explanation for why it was so little? Any split couples I know where both parents are keen to be involved the settlement came out at much closer to 50/50 (although only one couple actually has 50/50). In fact even in the couple I know where the dad is an abusive, uninterested fuckwit they have an EOW arrangement.

Relating your experiences back to feminism in general, the point to be made is that the current patriarchal system hurts both women and men, as you have experienced. Because society has been set up to separate men and women into two different groups, and give them strict roles based on gender, it means that it is very hard for both men and women to cross those dividing lines and to do in life what they really want to do rather than what is expected based on their genitals.

OP posts:
cailindana · 27/01/2015 09:33

Sorry that should say they have an EW arrangement - every weekend.

OP posts:
Jackieharris · 27/01/2015 10:29

These kind of threads always end up concentrating on discussing the work/life balances or not of city worker or lawyers or other top tier professional types. These are very uncommon jobs!

Most people do much more mundane, low paid non career jobs. But the male female parenting divide still happens even in split shift or strictly 9-5 families.

Loads of people work in the public sector where there is much more opportunity to work part time or job share. Yet how many male job share teachers are there?

TheFriar · 27/01/2015 12:04

When we are talking about work life balance, what are we talking about? The ability to have enough time to spend with the dcs, to do HW or to go out and have some hobbies?
It seems that for women work life balance is the balance between work and the dcs whereas for men it's work and hobbies. No wonder men don't feel the need to go part time and have a better balance!

Another thought, when 2 patents get get divorced, the mum usually has the dcs with her and dad an EOW arrangement. Why is that? Is it because we consider fathers unable to look after children? Not able?
If I was a man, I would feel angry and awful about that tbh!!

Now in other countries, when oeoe get divorced, the base line is a 50/50 split between parents. Fathers, who then don't have the choice, end up looking after their dcs bit means that
1- their ability to parent is recognised
2- they get to do it so they are better at it AND people and children see fathers looking after children
3- when it comes down to work, companies have to take that into account too, such as men do too. They have to learn to juggle things.

How seeing that a lot (most?) of marriage end up in a divorce, that's plenty if opportunity to turn the tables around and 'force' men or rather given men the opportunity to show they are good parents too. And for society to learn to accept a different way if looking at things.

Maybe again that's another way to make things change.

PetulaGordino · 27/01/2015 12:20

"when 2 patents get get divorced, the mum usually has the dcs with her and dad an EOW arrangement"

my understanding is that this often reflects the fact that in terms of courts, the aim is to keep things as close to the status quo as possible, so if the mother was the primary carer then that is likely to continue. this means that it has very little to do with not trusting men to parent, but far more that if more men want more time with their children post-divorce they need to do more pre-divorce. as cailin has said a number of times, men are really missing out here by not being more involved, whether that is through their own actions or because they have a particular profession that makes it difficult

Dervel · 27/01/2015 12:28

I have never been made to feel unqualified, or unable to do childcare when I've been to baby/toddler groups with my little one.

Not saying people didn't think that, but in the early months I was mainly focused on my baby anyway so not sure I would of noticed. As he's gotten to the toddler stage and I'm chatting more with other parents, I've found everyone pretty friendly.

In fact often enough in conversations stuff comes up where we're all talking about fears and worries about our respective parenting styles, not come across anyone overtly judge unless they are talking about themselves.

The choice is certainly there if you want to be an involved parent. At least in my experience.

TheFriar · 27/01/2015 12:29

And my point is that keeping the status qui us crazy idea when the whole family doesn't exist anymore. It's just an excuse to say that men normally don't do childcare therefore they won't know how to do it.
There a few counties where a 50/50 split us the norm. The USS is one, France too (or was until recently I think).
Ive seen a major shift in men behaviour because they had their dc 50% of the time.
And in attitude from men and women, as if they can do after getting divorced, surely they can before??

BUT it means that women need to let go of the fact they are not automatically the primary care giver and when you read posts on here you can see easily it won't be so easily accepted.

Besides, as a pp said, even when the father is involved, he doesn't get more than EOW which shows it's about the perception men can't parent rather than the fact the children aren't use to it or whatever.

PhaedraIsMyName · 27/01/2015 12:29

I've got a day off and am trying to use East coast wifi.

Do men need to be forced to be involved and who is going to do the forcing?

Jackie said "Most people do much more mundane, low paid non career jobs. But the male female parenting divide still happens even in split shift or strictly 9-5 families."

If that is correct,and I don't know if it is , then it's the parents concerned who need to resolve it. Nobody can do that for them. At weekends sorting out a fair share of the nice bits and the boring bits is a personal issue.. It doesn't need the approval of society at large.