River Island 'Anti-Nag Gag'

[SingSongSlummy]

Can't quite believe they are selling this...

twitter.com/salihughes/status/463615941860147200/photo/1

Mazupan could you kindly answer my questions? I have a particular thirst for arguments based on generalisations and I am eager to hear how you aquired your knowledge on women and how your experience has shaped your analysis on women in general.

Thank you.

"and let fly with insinuations that the posters' genitals smell? "

Looks like someone wasn't paying attention.

I was pointing out if I were to take what the article said and swap the genders around then there would be accusations of "misogynist".

And you proved me right.

The Metro is the same company as the Daily Mail.

Really? And you seriously think that pile of shite article was written from a feminist perspective? Are you really this stupid or are you being deliberately obtuse?

Given that it was according to you written by a feminist, can you tell me which one? I can't seem to find a byline there at all, so that I can write directly to the journailst and point out that they have suggested that anal rape is just an annoying thing men do, that they can't write in complete sentences and that they need to send their feminist card back, because they're doing it wrong.

I'm going to wait here patiently. I'm nice like that.

Ach, don't feed the troll.

Aw fuck. Who will I buy my jeans and t shirts from now ? Why do the dickheads have to do this ? < sheesh >

I don't want to feed anything but my own brain. Apologies for my selfishness. I have an inquisitive mind.

Saying it isn't attractive when men don't wash = fine

Saying it isn't attractive when women don't wash = misogynist!!!

But that's feminism for you.

It's fine to bash men until the cows come home, but if you even look at a woman the wrong way you're a "misogynist".

Are you ignoring me mazupan? I hope I have requested some clarification in a respectful manner. I do not wish to be rude.

Yeah, sorry mazupan, could you just quickly answer my question please? You state categorically that that shite article, which you didn't even bother to read before you posted it on here, and have been desperately trying to make out to be in some way anti men, was written by a feminist. Who works for the same company as the Daily Male. Could you please give me her name? I really do need to contact her reference her inability to write from a feminist perspective.

You also pointed out that the first picture is of a woman with her foot in a man's face, which is distasteful, but you failed to comment on the other 3 pictures, which are of obviously happy couples being happy. Did you miss them at all?

Her name is on the page. It isn't that difficult to miss.

They were 3 happy couple pics. So that makes the feminist pic ok does it?

What shit logic.

So what the hell does a picture of a woman putting her shoe in a man's face have to do with "equal rights"?

Buy a jumper from River Island, fine.
Wear it with a nag gag and you're a misogynist!
No wait, a feminist!
Who likes the smelly body parts? Is that the misandrists? Or the daily mail?
I'm so confused. :(

mazupan - what is it about the article that makes you think it's a feminist piece?

The fact it's not complimentary towards men?

If that's why, then you don't know what feminism is.

These trolls are messing with my mind. I don't even know if I want the vote any more.

It's not a feminist pic, we went through that before. I even stated myself that it's distasteful.

The journalist isn't a feminist either. She writes lists.

You really are a ridiculous excuse for a person, aren't you?

You don't read an misanthropic article properly, and then tell us that that's what we believe. You then insult us when we point out that you're wrong. You constantly and spectacularly miss the point of anything that is said to you.

I believe TereseaGreen has a question for you. She appears to be the only person who still has time for your ineptitude.

and there's no such fucking concept as misandry ffs!

It's as likely and as possible as being racist toward white anglo-saxons.

Christ that list is just absolutely fucking awful.

And clearly someone is playing silly buggers, pretending that they didn't understand the one about blow job/gag reflex.

On the basis of which, I would suggest ignoring.