Damn, about to go when...
OK, what you posted above is what he was ordered by the judge to write despite claiming it was not true. He had to before the judge would allow him to see his child again.
Here's his original posting on Facebook which you chose not to post (strangely).
"'If you are an evil, vindictive woman who wants to ruin your husband's life and take your son's father away from him completely - all you need to do is say that you're scared of your husband or domestic partner and they'll take him away!"
Where is his wife named? yes, we all KNOW what he was saying but he was careful not to name her. Also, fact is, he was cleared of the allegations which earlier prevented him from seeing his son. How come you're not getting all frothy mouthed about that one? Perjury and perverting the course of justice is a crime after-all - the later carrying a heavy sentence. So, as a victim of crime he was forced to accept he'd not see his son, and got all angry and posted a general comment on the net about it. I see quite a few above that are far stronger. You think it's right to humiliate a man who's suffered this way by making him apologise to the perpetrator? the judge wrote the words for him to post each day for 30 days, not the father himself.
This is the kind of behaviour that just goes to prove the kind of support needed. If a woman was treated this way we'd all be up in arms, instead it's used as evidence of him being a bad dad. Sighs...