Off-topic now and rather controversial - perhaps after this if it's better, we can take this offlist if needs be to continue. Also I'm just tired at the moment, not of the debate or of sincere questions, but IRL is getting in the way of reading. Online is getting in the way of reading.
I don't think Janina Ramirez is conservative. I do think she has been influenced at times by smear campaigns against former Labour left politicians, and she signed some letter saying she couldn't consider voting Labour because of antisemitism. My problem is I think there is antisemitism in all parties including the Labour Party, but I disagree about where the problem is coming from.
For example, an actress who claimed to have resigned twice from Labour over this issue before Jeremy Corbyn, against a Jewish Labour leader, Ed Miliband. And a really nasty article about Ed Miliband, which presumably applied to his brother David before the election 2015, written by another celeb historian, Dominic Sandbrook, described EM's father Ralph as "the man who hated Britain" - we're still hearing the echoes over 10 years later.
Then from 2015 a lot of writers, many with advanced qualifications in reading between the lines, started claim to believe all sorts of stories and claims, including lots of letters from female Labour MPs about sexist treatment. Letters, twitter posts. That's where Ramirez came in. Mary Beard may never have voted Labour, but I've not seen her slagging anyone off on Twitter. It upsets me when writers whose work I loved do this stuff, and I can't give up reading all the books they've written. The stories about bricks through MPs constituency office windows - investigation results never made it to the news. Everything was brought in to the mix. Books have been written from various viewpoints, pro and anti JC, pro Starmer, pro Tory - I may have bought one or two, for me or DP, but to be honest, I can't imagine wanting to read a whole book - articles I can handle and then mock afterwards, but a book.... no, even I'm not that masochistic.
So I agree that Mary Beard is a more traditional academic and sometimes she takes a neutral stance on political matters. It's not really about place on the political spectrum, but she hasn't said as many things which upset me. She hasn't claimed a need to support people with mental issues then denounced the Labour left as completely mad. Like some of the others are sane?
Ok, rant over, I'm moving the laptop away from my fingers briefly. Back later, possibly to delete this if someone hasn't reported it already.
Sorry, but you asked, @Terpsichore!