Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

What we're reading

Find your new favourite book or recommend one on our Book forum.

NEW Dickensalong - Martin Chuzzlewit 2024-2025

203 replies

Piggywaspushed · 20/07/2024 11:29

Come along and join me in the next Dickens readalong.

We have chosen Martin Chuzzlewit which was originally published by Dickens in 19 instalments, all exactly 32 pages long!

I propose condensing this to an eight month read, using Dickens' shorter sections as a guide (this is one fewer than NN). We begin in August, as follows:

August - Chapters 1 - 8
September - Chapters 9-15
October - Chapters 16-23
November - Chapters 24-29
December - Chapters 30-35
January 2025 - Chapters 36-41
February - Chapters 42-47
and finishing in
March 2025 - Chapters 48 - end

This on its publication history is interesting:

The early monthly numbers were not as successful as Dickens's previous work and sold about 20,000 copies each, as compared to 40,000 to 50,000 for the monthly numbers of the Pickwick Papers and Nicholas Nickleby, and 60,000 to 70,000 for the weekly issues of The Old Curiosity Shop. The lack of success of the novel caused a rift between Dickens and his publishers when they invoked a penalty clause in his contract requiring him to pay back money they had lent him to cover their costs.
Dickens responded to the disappointing early sales of the monthly parts compared to sales of previous works as monthly instalments; he changed the plot to send the title character to the United States. This allowed the author to portray the United States, which he had visited in 1842, satirically, as a near-wilderness with pockets of civilisation filled with deceitful and self-promoting hucksters.
Dickens's satire of American modes and manners in the novel won him no friends on the other side of the Atlantic, where the instalments containing the offending chapters were greeted with a "frenzy of wrath". As a consequence Dickens received abusive mail and newspaper clippings from the United States

Summoning old faithfuls and newcomers, one and all!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
Piggywaspushed · 01/04/2025 13:27

Coincidence Bingo Grin !

No, she doesn't really talk about doublings so witter away. She does question which 'Martin Chuzzlewit' the book is named for - which did make me think as I spent most of our readalong moaning about the absence (and presence) Martin Chuzzlewit Jr. who still si a minor feature even in the very ending.

Katie seems more taken with the US sections than I am - and in both videos suggests it's half the novel which it definitley isn't.

I actually did laugh at Sairey Gamp, yes - and also earlier with her secret teapot of grog. I actually am so stupid I didn't notice Mrs Harris is an 'off screen character'! I laughed more at Pecksniff being beaten up by an elderly gentleman and rolling around on the floor.

I liked the demise of Jonas the best. Proper drama.

My favourite bit, because I am very soppy, was John and Ruth 'looking for the fountain' and finding a marriage proposal instead:

they seemed to have come there by a silent understanding. Yet, when they got there, they were a little confused by being there, which was the strangest part of all because there is nothing naturally confusing in a fountain. We all know that.

I think it's the genius of the flustered lovers followed by the emphatic final sentence of four syllables that I find so masterly.

OP posts:
Piggywaspushed · 01/04/2025 13:29

That stuff about the gender roles of - as you say almost panto like- performers is so fascinating! She is like a panto dame!

OP posts:
FuzzyCaoraDhubh · 01/04/2025 15:12

The idea of adapting the book for stage sounds mind-boggling! It does sound very panto as you say, Inaptonym.
I think there were too many characters in this one. The barber and the undertaker's family, for instance. They were fillers, surely. I nearly forgot who Bailey was, the boy who lived. I think Dickens loves drawing character portraits. He can't help himself. And he was filling pages as well, but this book was character-heavy.

There was a very good footnote about Mrs Gamp's idiolect. It suggests that her unusual speech patterns become more and more pronounced as the book progresses. I must look it up again. I think it suggested an increasing level of annoyance with the character on the part of the reader which I think Piggy and I related to! Although she really got it handed to her at the end and you could nearly feel sorry for her. That's true about Mrs Harris as an offside character. Very clever! And grog in the teapot! Very funny!

The resurrection of Old Martin Chuzzlewit took me by surprise, but it was a good plot device. The title of the book makes more sense now as it relates to the two Martin Chuzzlewits and to their journey self-improvement.

I enjoyed Katy's discussion on gender and particularly to Tom Pinch as the male angel. It was really interesting, particularly how the book ended with Tom. Martin Junior became a minor character in his own book!

FuzzyCaoraDhubh · 01/04/2025 15:23

Mrs Gamp has an Appendix to herself in the edition I have.
I'm projecting my annoyance though.
I made that bit up!

ChessieFL · 01/04/2025 18:28

I have enjoyed this, because it’s Dickens and it’s always enjoyable reading his language and the characters he creates, but this one felt more bitty than the others I’ve read - more like a series of scenes than a coherent plot.

I had also assumed it was named for MC Jnr and wondered why but thinking of it being named for both makes sense.

Talking of Dickens’ language I was very taken in the final chapters by the descriptions of ‘a monstrously excited little man in velveteen shorts and a very tall hat’ and a ‘hairy young gentleman with the outline of a face’. What lovely images these conjure up!

LadybirdDaphne · 01/04/2025 20:34

I actually quite liked it in the end, I thought it was well-plotted with all the strands pulled together in the big ensemble scene where Old Martin outlines Mr Pecksniff’s skulduggery from start to finish. (We’ll forget the American Interlude which was shoved in to raise sales when they didn’t reach the numbers expected.) Also clever was the way the Mrs Harris joke (spoiler: she doesn’t exist) was built up throughout for Betsy Prigg to decisively burst Mrs Gamp’s bubble near the end.

Tom Pinch is alright if you like that sort of thing. I preferred Mark Tapley - less perfect, but more jolly.

Any thoughts on next read? Too soon?

FuzzyCaoraDhubh · 01/04/2025 21:01

There are always brilliant moments in his books and I enjoy his colourful use of language and the vivid characters even if I don't particularly love the book in question.
I think I would give this one a 3/5.

Piggywaspushed · 01/04/2025 21:22

Re the next read - the only big Dickens we/I haven't done s Dombey and Son which I know little about.

Open to suggestions!

OP posts:
FuzzyCaoraDhubh · 01/04/2025 21:52

Dombey and Son sounds good!

inaptonym · 01/04/2025 22:25

Yes please D&S! (ME Braddon's The Doctor's Wife has been mouldering on my TBR for over about 20 years because apparently it's full of refs to/spoilers for D&S)

ChessieFL · 02/04/2025 05:47

Happy to go with Dombey & Son as that’s another one I haven’t read before.

LadybirdDaphne · 02/04/2025 07:20

Happy to go with the Dombey consensus!

Piggywaspushed · 02/04/2025 15:13

Okeydokey.

I reckon our first month for that will be May.

I shall procure a copy and we can go from there.

Presume I am in charge because I seem unable to release myself from this huge responsibility! Wink

OP posts:
FuzzyCaoraDhubh · 02/04/2025 16:50

Yes please, Piggy! ⭐️

BadSpellaSpellaSpella · 03/04/2025 14:35

Yep Domby is one i haven't read yet, although I'm worried I've read all the 'good ones' and it's all downhill from here

LadybirdDaphne · 03/04/2025 20:10

I watched Katie’s introduction to Dombey last night, she says it is her second favourite Dickens (after Our Mutual Friend) so hopefully it will be good.

Although I’ll be glad when my brain stops singing ‘Dombey, Dombey and Sons’ a la Joseph and His Amazing Technicolour Dreamcoat at me. (Just me?)

Piggywaspushed · 03/04/2025 20:29

Well, no longer just you...

OP posts:
LadybirdDaphne · 04/04/2025 00:45

Hehe

NEW Dickensalong - Martin Chuzzlewit 2024-2025
Piggywaspushed · 05/04/2025 15:28

Just got my copy in the post. It's a hefty tome!

OP posts:
LiesDoNotBecomeUs · 12/04/2025 17:55

I really didn't get on with Martin C. (It did arrive at a suddenly tough time here)

However, I really loved Dombey and Son when I read it (c40 years ago). It was my first Dickens novel but I remember little about it -except the feeling it left me with.

(I'd read Christmas Carol - seen the musical Oliver - and the film of Great Expectations so wasn't exactly ready for a full-scale 19C novel.)

Piggywaspushed · 16/04/2025 07:30

Keep an eye out over the next couple of days for the Dombeyalong and get your copies ready !

I will link to the thread when I have planned the instalments!

OP posts:
FuzzyCaoraDhubh · 16/04/2025 08:27

Excellent, Piggy! Thank you!
Dombeyalong 😅

Piggywaspushed · 16/04/2025 08:29

It sounds like a lesser known Showaddywaddy number .

OP posts:
cassandre · 16/04/2025 21:55

I'm also keen to read Dombey and Son!

Very belated thanks to everyone for their closing thoughts on MC. I'm very annoyed with myself because I meant to join the convo two weeks ago, but instead am chiming in ridiculously late once again. (My anxiety has been sky-high for the past few weeks, and has stopped me doing lots of things I wanted to do, but my head has finally calmed down a bit now thanks to the fact that I've finally managed to submit a very very late work project. Sigh. ADHD and lengthy work projects are not a happy combination.)

Anyway, I agree with everyone else that MC had rather too large a cast of characters and was too patchwork-like, but it was a great read nonetheless.

@inaptonym I love that detail about Mrs Gamp being played by men in drag! A bit like the British panto tradition, which emphatically doesn't exist in the US.

@Piggywaspushed I'm not a huge fan of videos (always prefer written text over spoken), but I watched Katie's first 10-minute one and I'm glad I did. I really liked her point about how Tom Pinch is unusual in that he plays a kind of 'male angel' role usually reserved by Dickens for women. It's refreshing to see a different model of masculinity that's not so alpha-male.

Also, I read the intro to my Penguin edition of MC (I think it's the same one you have, @FuzzyCaoraDhubh , because it has the long appendix on Mrs Gamp's dialect), and the editor Patricia Ingham is very hard on Tom Pinch. She argues that the 'good' characters in the novel have very little agency, as opposed to the selfish ones:
It is true that the selfless survive in the persons of Tom and Ruth Pinch, Mary Graham and Mark Tapley. But all are neutered as forces for good. Their passivity and mild stoicism leave them no capacity to exert an influence on others let alone on events. Everywhere their own selflessness blinds them to the truth so that it appears as a form of stupidity. This is particularly true of Tom Pinch, a supposed moral balance in the overall picture. His gullibility has a Uriah-Heep-like quality. His elderly appearance is against him. Even his musicianship looks like the occasion for a series of obscene puns suggesting sexual impotence.

!!!

I thought this view of Tom was overly harsh, so was glad to see him getting some love from Katie. Tom does have the balls to leave Pecksniff, so he's not completely blind and gullible. And comparing him to Uriah Heep is completely unwarranted FFS!

The Ruth/Tom/John Westlock menage a trois does remind me a bit of the Kate/Nicholas/Smike trio in Nicholas Nickleby, though Tom's connection to John is a bit less passionate than Smike's connection to Nicholas. There does seem to be something 'queer' about it IMO, or at the very least something that defies traditional gender norms. Tom Pinch is more transgressive as a character than Ingham's analysis implies, dammit.

cassandre · 16/04/2025 22:02

An interesting point that Ingham made though was about how Jonas gradually emerges as an increasingly complex character, torn by imagination and guilt (like MacBeth). Before the murder, he speaks much more in colloquial language and dialect, but after the murder, he becomes a more serious character who speaks in much more high-register speech, which dignifies his plight. I hadn't noticed that.

About the ending, I was less than impressed by MC Senior. He's a bit of a Lear figure, trying to arrange everyone's destinies for them. So he was cross with Mary and young Martin because HE wanted to be the one to bring them together. And at the end, he repents of his selfishness. But how much is he really repenting, given that he's still orchestrated this dramatic scene of revelation at the end? He's still loving the sense of power if you ask me.

Anyway, it's good to have got these thoughts off my chest, albeit very belatedly. Phew. Looking forward to joining you all in the realm of Dombey! (raises a virtual glass to say cheers, and special thanks as always to @Piggywaspushed !).