Ham pr disasters 57! ….continuing the confusion and controversy….

[jeffgoldblum]

Once more into the breach dear friends!!

Yes, I think they will try to get involved with related charities. I know first hand how insidious child sex abuse can be, etc and nobody will question why she didn't try to use her influence to follow up with relevant authorities.

Yup. She calls up the old alkie, tells her she'll give her x amount of dollars to hand-write a letter and send it to <very specialist branch of Met>.

A poster on twitter a few days ago wrote that MM called the Met asking if they had received a letter.

The private couple can't do anything without announcing it.

Obviously we will need to wait to see what the Sun reveals tomorrow or the following day but ...

if the 7-page letter contains no more concrete evidence than a single alleged conversation about child abuse, in which TMsnr denies any wrongdoing, I can see why the Met Police would not have forwarded it to any other police force.
There would be nothing on which any force could take any action.

ETA Obviously the conversation about the travel to Thailand etc is gruesome if true.

...why a woman from New Mexico addressed her letter to the Fixated Threat Assessment Centre (FTAC) - how did she know to address it there? Did someone help her? Also yet another handwritten letter...

This is very curious. Did she also write to any jurisdictionally relevant authorities

I was about to comment on your obvious bonnyness ! ….now I discover the secret is pies! ….if only I knew sooner!!! …all this time wasted on my beautification cheese diet!! …what a fool!

Loveless is on the make IMO because if her concerns were for the CSA victims she would have brought her evidence to LE in the appropriate jurisdiction. If the DD of her ex H from 44years perviously hadn’t married a prince she wouldn’t have inserted herself into this. That’s not to say she is lying. It can be both.

We have no idea if the police or MM took the claims seriously - there’s a possibility that MM dismissed her letter as mad ramblings to the police to quieten it down but that’s not her call and it still leaves the Met with the obligation to initiate next steps which they seemed to have failed to do. Interesting that the ex wife interview slated TM but left out CSA - did The Mirror refuse to print allegations without evidence on this charge - but were happy to do so on all her other claims.

MM was already estranged from TM when this letter dropped in Jan 19 and even if she was left confused and not convinced of his guilt as no investigation or evidence materialised she was right IMO to keep her distance to protect her children.

🤣🤣🤣🤣 why not! …( although most of us are too busy eating pies and cheese!)

@DontLiveByTheClouds! Behave yourself! , what have pies to do with surrogacy? ..nothing…you owe this poster an apology and should focus on the poster who did bring it up!

Loveless died in 2024 so she can neither confirm nor deny that she wrote the letter.

Please can we stop talking about surrogacy?

We have always kept these threads clear of conspiracy theories about the children, and it would be a shame for that to change.

If Harry and spare are to be believed…because they thought it was amusing and two fingers up to the press , the public and the royal family!

Surely just like any other private citizen that cosies up to the press, H&M will arrange their own security or the newspapers will. Not that they need it, they have their trotters in the media trough and are more likely to be chasing journos down themselves.

The whole thing is just appalling, why M is feeding the frenzy is unfathomable. Until there are cold facts delivered by an independent party with proven integrity it's all up in the air- all the mis truths, letters, tms diagnosed with dementia, all the he said she said and journos in Thailand filming a handover of boxes.

Lady C - yes, I know she is reliable as the weather - claims that MM always intended to write a book after her dad is dead alleging CSA, because she fkoated the idea to Lady C ( in what form of proposal I have no idea).

The outline you've provided, Lunde, would support the proposition that she was laying a paper trail to cement TMSr's guilt, and her rejection of him because of it.

The bit she missed - because she was no empathy or natural moral compass, so would not have consideed anyone's interests but her own - is wihat is now biting her bum; namely, if you knew your dad was a bad 'un, why didn't you make sure the police in Cebu were warned

I wonder if Uncle Spencer and Professor Countess the Fourth Cat Jarman are still ‘doing the downward dog in front of the Van Dykes’ at dear old Althorp?

Of course she didn't consider the optics of total disregard for future vulnerable children because her and her hideous husband only think of themselves

I won't be gaslit about the Birkenhead pics.

On a lighter note - I was thinking about the tale of 2 princely interviews

Harry said "I am a Prince" and repeated it several times.

William said "I wanted to be a policeman or a DJ" and laughed at himself

Try a macaroni cheese pie. Seriously.

The Sun article saying the IT guy said the downloaded files are between 2014-2020

So that’s up to two years of offending that could have been prevented!

The contrast is stark. I wonder will it ever sink in with H what an absolute mess he has got himself into ?

Bells?

😳 I may have seen …eaten….tried it on my face! …..

A tell all book would be a dreadful idea. Therefore I fully expect her to do it

A few threads ago, before all this blew up, I said that every time I think they couldn't be more crass, they find new depths to sink to. So on that basis....

Althorp? Spencer? Diana? His book ? He's been Markled 😂🤷‍♀️