Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Ham pr disasters 57! ….continuing the confusion and controversy….

857 replies

jeffgoldblum · Yesterday 19:46

Once more into the breach dear friends!!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
19
Starryfifty · Yesterday 20:28

smilesy · Yesterday 20:27

The BBC is reporting that the letter passed to Meghan was indeed written by Rosalyn Loveless. So is it possible that Meghan just dismissed it?

That's fair enough but why cut him off, under the guise of concern for her own children?

Rhaidimiddim · Yesterday 20:30

Cismyfatarse · Yesterday 20:23

I wonder how long their host has given them accommodation for? And how the famously reticent billionaire feels about this circus.

If he's a republican, he probably thinks he's getting a good return on his investment.

TheOvertGardener · Yesterday 20:30

Starryfifty · Yesterday 20:28

That's fair enough but why cut him off, under the guise of concern for her own children?

She actually didn’t have children when she cut him off. Despite what she’s saying now.

Mondommountain · Yesterday 20:31

TheOvertGardener · Yesterday 20:30

She actually didn’t have children when she cut him off. Despite what she’s saying now.

Exactly !

Snuppeline · Yesterday 20:33

I have genuinely tried to read the past few threads in full before adding my ha’penny’s worth because I dislike others not reading a thread in full before posting (often as they are way off mark) but honestly it’s not possible to keep up and so apologies if thread 56 page 9+ covered this! BUT what I can’t get my head around is why would the x-wife of TM snr send a handwritten dang letter with accusations to the Met and not to BP or Frogmore tatty-ol Cottage where MM lived. I would understand x-wife sending letters to the FBI and that being typed up as a communique to the forces involved with the royals but not a handwritten letter directly to the Met. Has this been shed light on yet? Did I get my wires crossed?

Edited a spelling mistake for clarity

Starryfifty · Yesterday 20:33

TheOvertGardener · Yesterday 20:30

She actually didn’t have children when she cut him off. Despite what she’s saying now.

Yes of course! My apologies, contradictions may vary !

jeffgoldblum · Yesterday 20:33

I’m a bit preoccupied at the moment….nothing to add yet but am reading all the comments and either nodding along … Or thinking hmmm 🤔 maybe!

OP posts:
nicegreenwillow · Yesterday 20:33

Rhaidimiddim · Yesterday 20:30

If he's a republican, he probably thinks he's getting a good return on his investment.

Why? The Sussexes are doing a good job of making the rest of the RF look good!

TheOvertGardener · Yesterday 20:34

Mondommountain · Yesterday 20:31

Exactly !

Although I did recently hear the theory that Archie was born earlier than announced.

I thought that was daft. Now I’m thinking there is more we don’t know than one could ever guess here.

Puzzledandpissedoff · Yesterday 20:34

Thanks once again. jeff Flowers

nicegreenwillow · Yesterday 20:34

CluelessAmerican · Yesterday 20:27

Wasn't in it two weeks before school started?

Was it? I think they visited KC in July?

AutumnCrowning · Yesterday 20:35

I am going to catch up tonight maybe, but thanks Jeff for what are going to be GalaxyQuest-style ‘historical documents’ in these threads.

Also thanks to our previous thread starters AtlasVue, BigWilly and bluegreygreen.

TheOvertGardener · Yesterday 20:35

Snuppeline · Yesterday 20:33

I have genuinely tried to read the past few threads in full before adding my ha’penny’s worth because I dislike others not reading a thread in full before posting (often as they are way off mark) but honestly it’s not possible to keep up and so apologies if thread 56 page 9+ covered this! BUT what I can’t get my head around is why would the x-wife of TM snr send a handwritten dang letter with accusations to the Met and not to BP or Frogmore tatty-ol Cottage where MM lived. I would understand x-wife sending letters to the FBI and that being typed up as a communique to the forces involved with the royals but not a handwritten letter directly to the Met. Has this been shed light on yet? Did I get my wires crossed?

Edited a spelling mistake for clarity

Edited

Don’t try. It’s impossible. It’s never a straight line and jumps about.

I agree with you and wondered the same. Just more Markle drama.

Rhaidimiddim · Yesterday 20:36

TheOvertGardener · Yesterday 20:26

Let’s see, TMJr said he reported in July.

What day did HaM first announce their return to UK?

Edited

While ackowledging the correlation, I still don't get why they had to high-tail in back to Blighty. It hasn't gained them anything, and I can't see what benefit they realistically expected from the move.

Starryfifty · Yesterday 20:36

nicegreenwillow · Yesterday 20:33

Why? The Sussexes are doing a good job of making the rest of the RF look good!

Bizarrely they are achieving the opposite of what they intended. I know a lot of people who are extreme republican (abolish the monarchy etc) are now 100 💯 team KC and PW

smilesy · Yesterday 20:37

Snuppeline · Yesterday 20:33

I have genuinely tried to read the past few threads in full before adding my ha’penny’s worth because I dislike others not reading a thread in full before posting (often as they are way off mark) but honestly it’s not possible to keep up and so apologies if thread 56 page 9+ covered this! BUT what I can’t get my head around is why would the x-wife of TM snr send a handwritten dang letter with accusations to the Met and not to BP or Frogmore tatty-ol Cottage where MM lived. I would understand x-wife sending letters to the FBI and that being typed up as a communique to the forces involved with the royals but not a handwritten letter directly to the Met. Has this been shed light on yet? Did I get my wires crossed?

Edited a spelling mistake for clarity

Edited

No, none of this has been explained yet. You are not alone in being rather baffled 😆

Passingthroughagain · Yesterday 20:37

Tomorrow's front pages will land in about an hour, so I wonder what new instalment The Sun has up its sleeve.

Starryfifty · Yesterday 20:38

Well, I'd say that's the end of that debate 😂

Ham pr disasters 57! ….continuing the confusion and controversy….
TheOvertGardener · Yesterday 20:39

Rhaidimiddim · Yesterday 20:36

While ackowledging the correlation, I still don't get why they had to high-tail in back to Blighty. It hasn't gained them anything, and I can't see what benefit they realistically expected from the move.

I agree but think it will come out in the wash.

Harry admitted it was a very last minute choice in his QC interview.

nicegreenwillow · Yesterday 20:40

Starryfifty · Yesterday 20:36

Bizarrely they are achieving the opposite of what they intended. I know a lot of people who are extreme republican (abolish the monarchy etc) are now 100 💯 team KC and PW

I know. It's certainly changed my attitude towards them as people! Plus I saw William on GN and thought: talk about a contrast with Harry and GQ!

nicegreenwillow · Yesterday 20:41

TheOvertGardener · Yesterday 20:39

I agree but think it will come out in the wash.

Harry admitted it was a very last minute choice in his QC interview.

It'll all come out.

pipinghot · Yesterday 20:42

I can't help thinking somewhere somehow this is all going to end in a very horrible fashion, one way or another. You know when webs of lies catch up with people and they see no easy way out. People (unspecified) need to tread carefully. It feels like watching a pack of cards falling apart in slow motion.

AnAlpacaForChristmasPleaseSanta · Yesterday 20:42

smilesy · Yesterday 20:37

No, none of this has been explained yet. You are not alone in being rather baffled 😆

Every day so far something new has been revealed that makes what should be a bloody awful but straightforward situation more confusing.

I did have to raise an eyebrow at Chris Ship on the news yesterday frantically saying it doesn't matter about MM getting the years wrong and absolutely shouldn't be something to focus on.

Mylovelygreendress · Yesterday 20:42

TheOvertGardener · Yesterday 20:34

Although I did recently hear the theory that Archie was born earlier than announced.

I thought that was daft. Now I’m thinking there is more we don’t know than one could ever guess here.

If you believe stuff on X , Archie was born late April . “ Evidence” for this is that Harry apparently said he had changed a lot in 2 weeks ( rather than days).
Make of that what you will.
Thanks for the shiny new thread Jeff !

Lunde · Yesterday 20:43

TheOvertGardener · Yesterday 20:21

They seem to have come banging on the fortress walls and hollering to get back in just before this cracked open.

Coincidence?

July 2026 - TMJ reports finding images

July 10 2026 - HAM attend hastily arranged tea with KC and QC. It lasts only 47 minutes some of which H meets with his father and Camilla alone.

August 19 - HAM announce intention to move back to Britain for unknown reasons.

August 26 - HAM return and launch massive campaign to get security reinstated and demands to be accepted as working royals.

coincidence?

Swipe left for the next trending thread