We don’t know whether Loveless did or didn’t report the matter of suspected CSA to the police in her jurisdiction. As she was with Thomas Snr in the 60s/70s, she’s not likely to have had much to go to the police with. No appeals to search for evidence on laptops or the like existed in those days. Do you think the police back then would have taken her seriously if her only evidence was conversations?
We don’t know what she knew about CSA and TMsnr and we don’t know the contents of the letter or even if she wrote it.
As it’s Meghan having a child that appears to have prompted Loveless’s letter (assuming it’s in a similar vein as the Mirror article), then it’s entirely possible she’d have warned Meghan had she been having children with AN Other. We’ll never know though, will we, since Meghan only had children with Harry.
How many letters containing mad ramblings about the royals do you think they receive every week? What next steps should the UK police take on a letter containing unsubstantiated allegations about a US citizen living in Mexico, committing crimes in SEA, and who has never set foot in the UK? They’ve asked the IPCC to look at whether what they did do (whatever that was) was enough.
The letter was sent to royal protection, and if the Mirror article is anything to go by, the purpose of the letter was to tell Meghan to keep Archie away from Thomas senior. Once that message was passed on, and as per my comment above, what else were the UK police meant to do?
Meghan, once warned of suspected CSA, and given her immensely powerful position both sides of the Atlantic, and self described status as a feminist, humanitarian and child safety advocate, could have been the one getting this investigated in the present day, rather than leaving it to an elderly drunk with 50 year old memories of conversations and little else to go on.