Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Ham pr disasters 54! ….the relentless reconciliation edition…

1000 replies

jeffgoldblum · 22/10/2026 15:02

Apologies for my tardiness! , the last thread finished unexpectedly!!! 😱

OP posts:
Thread gallery
36
AtIusvue · 23/10/2026 10:54

AutumnCrowAndTheEclectics · 23/10/2026 10:51

None of that matches up with her actions and her statements subsequently regarding her letters sent to him. It doesn’t tally with her reasons given for the privacy/copyright court action, her friends’ statements on her behalf, having a letter delivered to her father in hospital by a US diplomat, the things that Harry’s said …

I think her PR on this is going off the rails very rapidly.

You’re right.

The one thing about the media circus around the both of them- is that all we have to do is a quick internet search: Articles, the documentary, interviews all contradict what she is saying now

PullTheBricksDown · 23/10/2026 10:55

itwouldbebettertojumpPiggy · 23/10/2026 10:34

I don’t think the RF would claim any moral superiority at all.

Whoever authorised that ill advised statement has done H&M no favours at all and rather than shutting conversation down, it has opened up far more questions.

In the same vein as AMW.

Wish they would learn not to rush into making statements. It never turns out well. As you say, more questions raised now.

Rhaidimiddim · 23/10/2026 10:55

WilIiamsExtraSausage · 23/10/2026 10:15

So how did The Scum get hold of the story then?

Thomas Jr sold it, I believe.

EDA the last two words.

notimagain · 23/10/2026 10:55

@PullTheBricksDown

There's quite a bit of odd stuff here. Why would a letter be sent to the Met? Thomas Markle has never lived in the UK, it's not their jurisdiction (and I have a low opinion of the Metropolitan Police but this really wasn't their job)

Agreed.

TheTwerkingDuchessOfMonteshitshow · 23/10/2026 10:56

I think it’s very important not to let the abuse of children be mixed up in Harry and Meghans choices/behaviours over years. They are two different matters entirely and should stay that way.

Keep in mind they were engaged in November 2017 and Harry hadn’t yet met his future father in law. I think it would be very convenient for people to try and muddy the waters but it shouldn’t be allowed to happen.

jeffgoldblum · 23/10/2026 10:57

TheTwerkingDuchessOfMonteshitshow · 23/10/2026 10:47

Ive just read your post.

You’re absolutely correct. Hopefully a new thread won’t be started and posts will die a death here. I feel ashamed that I posted on such an awful subject.

I hope I’ve misunderstood you!!
why on earth would we not continue discussing hams pr?
did others stop discussing Andrew?
if you feel guilty stay of the threads but I assure you they will continue!

OP posts:
Starryfifty · 23/10/2026 10:58

notimagain · 23/10/2026 10:55

@PullTheBricksDown

There's quite a bit of odd stuff here. Why would a letter be sent to the Met? Thomas Markle has never lived in the UK, it's not their jurisdiction (and I have a low opinion of the Metropolitan Police but this really wasn't their job)

Agreed.

Edited

Exactly! She shouldn't have said anything yet until everything is very clear. Markle Senior has come out denying everything and claims he's been stitched up by his son. What an absolute shitshow

mysoddenbananabread · 23/10/2026 10:58

AtIusvue · 23/10/2026 10:51

In 2022 the docu stated that it was the wedding circus and all that, that caused the fallout. Harry said he blamed himself for the fact Meg doesn’t have a father.

This is 4 years after they found out about what he was up to?

Why were they covering for him then?

https://pagesix.com/2022/12/08/prince-harry-blames-himself-for-meghans-relationship-with-her-dad/

Oops don't tell me they are complicit / sheltered a paedo in this ? You know the very thing the fans claim that all of the RF did/do?

IAmATorturedPoet · 23/10/2026 10:58

That statement raises more questions than answers.

twosmallaxolotls · 23/10/2026 10:59

jeffgoldblum · 23/10/2026 10:57

I hope I’ve misunderstood you!!
why on earth would we not continue discussing hams pr?
did others stop discussing Andrew?
if you feel guilty stay of the threads but I assure you they will continue!

Thank you. It's current, it's pertinent and people will discuss.

itwouldbebettertojumpPiggy · 23/10/2026 11:00

I’m wondering (not that I was in any doubt before) how anyone can believe anything H&M say.

They have varying recollections of epic proportions and continually show themselves to be liars and fib knitters.

Rhaidimiddim · 23/10/2026 11:01

TheTwerkingDuchessOfMonteshitshow · 23/10/2026 10:40

If this is true I really hope people don’t make the abuse of children an excuse for the no contact with Meghan and her father. If it’s true and she knew but did nothing it’s horrendous and, if she didn’t know then the person we’ve seen over the years is who she is.

Either way it’s not a good look.

eta - let’s not forget her fathers name was on the order of service. He was always expected to be at the wedding till the photos of him being measured for a suit were published.

Edited

Whatever the truth of what she knew and when, it raises a whole raft of questions regarding that letter she sent to her Dad that was subsequently leaked by her friends.

Kingsandqueenz · 23/10/2026 11:02

Starryfifty · 23/10/2026 10:58

Exactly! She shouldn't have said anything yet until everything is very clear. Markle Senior has come out denying everything and claims he's been stitched up by his son. What an absolute shitshow

And Meghan's "friends " statement & her own have made things so much worse. A whole new can of worms has been opened & is totally contradicting much that was already said.. also if this happened in 2018 was Thomas Markle charged?
Meghan knew but said she cut him off for selling photos of himself in a suit to the press? Why cover for him? Why send all those letters ?
Nothing is adding up & the statements have made it so much worse!

IAmATorturedPoet · 23/10/2026 11:02

jeffgoldblum · 23/10/2026 10:57

I hope I’ve misunderstood you!!
why on earth would we not continue discussing hams pr?
did others stop discussing Andrew?
if you feel guilty stay of the threads but I assure you they will continue!

I agree @jeffgoldblum
To say we should now put a stop to any more PR threads is over the top. There is always the option of not engaging or hiding a thread. 🤷‍♀️

FancyKitten · 23/10/2026 11:02

TheTwerkingDuchessOfMonteshitshow · 23/10/2026 10:40

If this is true I really hope people don’t make the abuse of children an excuse for the no contact with Meghan and her father. If it’s true and she knew but did nothing it’s horrendous and, if she didn’t know then the person we’ve seen over the years is who she is.

Either way it’s not a good look.

eta - let’s not forget her fathers name was on the order of service. He was always expected to be at the wedding till the photos of him being measured for a suit were published.

Edited

I think her dad let her down badly with the wedding. It was really embarrassing, and Charles was very kind to her (and Doria). I also think that TM was not ready for it all (I mean, his daughter was marrying Prince Harry!). The marriage just happened too quickly…

AtIusvue · 23/10/2026 11:03

Of course we can discuss in the PR thread Meghans statement.

After all, this is PR that’s put this out on behalf of Meghan. She understandably can’t be seen to be anywhere near this.

BUT - that statement raises too many questions

  • Shes known for years and years and never said anything?
  • over those years they decide the subject of their ire wasn’t to be Markle, but his family instead???
  • Confusing and contradictory evidence is out there, put there by Meg n Harry, of why she was no contact. It was not because of what she knew about these allegations in previous (and multiple) media
  • Why would she not say anything. Everything leaks…why didn’t this come out?
AutumnCrowAndTheEclectics · 23/10/2026 11:03

SiegfriedSassoon · 23/10/2026 10:35

Gosh is that why they did it, for tax credits. I always wondered why people made a show of themselves with that nonsense when it couldn't be making them money.

I remember one Christmas someone at work trying to flog their (adult) daughters wares.. small portions of the cheapest looking sweets stuffed into sandwich bags and tied with a bit of red string. I was speechless. But some people are just so kind and bought some anyway to be nice. No doubt binning then when they got home because no way could you give them to anyone as a gift.

Yes, under the WTC rules (set by HMRC) it only mattered that you work a certain number of hours. There was no minimum earnings floor to be achieved, as there is now with UC.

In terms of Meg’s business, I think she does it for the status of being a ‘businesswoman’ and for the ego. She is the main product really, with purchases signifying support for her among the Squaderati. ‘As ever’ is just a glorified fan club selling tat to fans who’ll mostly grow out of it eventually, but in the meantime compete to show off their loyalty through the goodies they’ve acquired. The squad seems to love a bit of conspicuous consumption!

twosmallaxolotls · 23/10/2026 11:03

IAmATorturedPoet · 23/10/2026 11:02

I agree @jeffgoldblum
To say we should now put a stop to any more PR threads is over the top. There is always the option of not engaging or hiding a thread. 🤷‍♀️

Quite. Plus; it's about the PR, things happen and we can't pretend they don't.

Rhaidimiddim · 23/10/2026 11:03

IAmATorturedPoet · 23/10/2026 10:58

That statement raises more questions than answers.

At this point, I would not be surprised if the Met Police deny knowledge of any such letter.

twosmallaxolotls · 23/10/2026 11:04

AtIusvue · 23/10/2026 11:03

Of course we can discuss in the PR thread Meghans statement.

After all, this is PR that’s put this out on behalf of Meghan. She understandably can’t be seen to be anywhere near this.

BUT - that statement raises too many questions

  • Shes known for years and years and never said anything?
  • over those years they decide the subject of their ire wasn’t to be Markle, but his family instead???
  • Confusing and contradictory evidence is out there, put there by Meg n Harry, of why she was no contact. It was not because of what she knew about these allegations in previous (and multiple) media
  • Why would she not say anything. Everything leaks…why didn’t this come out?

Very pertinent points

Starryfifty · 23/10/2026 11:07

Typical narcissist. "To protect our children " what about the abused children in these photos/ images?

Heyelpheyelp · 23/10/2026 11:09

If the Metropolitan police knew enough to tell Meghan about “disturbing allegations” in 2018 why did they not ask the US/Mexican police to investigate? They should have searched Thomas Markle’s property/computer files as soon as he fell under suspicion shouldn’t they?

Candleabra · 23/10/2026 11:10

Goodness me, this is a bizarre and terrible turn of events. Nothing makes sense though. If Meghan knew in 2018, then surely she’d never speak about her father again, or would issue a “I’m not going to talk about that” when asked about the estrangement. Instead we have Harry pontificating and “blaming” himself.
And that’s if it’s true - Tom jr seems like a piece of work so who knows…
And that’s a very bold statement from Meghan, hasn’t she backed herself into a corner now? I wonder who’s advising her? A holding statement of “I’m deeply shocked and processing the news, I won’t be making any further statement at this time” would surely have been better?

Kingsandqueenz · 23/10/2026 11:11

itwouldbebettertojumpPiggy · 23/10/2026 11:00

I’m wondering (not that I was in any doubt before) how anyone can believe anything H&M say.

They have varying recollections of epic proportions and continually show themselves to be liars and fib knitters.

The story has only broken hours ago & already Meghan has made it 10 times worse by her statement .
Why were the Met investigating? TM lived in America..

IAmATorturedPoet · 23/10/2026 11:11

Rhaidimiddim · 23/10/2026 11:03

At this point, I would not be surprised if the Met Police deny knowledge of any such letter.

I wouldn't rule anything out, including that right now.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.