Ham pr disasters thread 47! …it’s all so quiet…it’s all so still ….

[jeffgoldblum]

Still interested! , still not bored ( well slightly!) 😁

Her music choice usage is very MySpace circa web1.0

The artist or song has "The fox" in the title aka PH.

we all stopped updating our emotional status via our song choice in 2004.

I once saw an influencer-type video that she had done about a day in Toronto ... the camera was focused on Meghan walking along or sitting at the table, etc, so it was impossible to see which street she was on or which restaurant she had entered.

I remember that so well, @bluegreygreen, and her schtick about "showing you my favourite places" only for us to seeing nothing except her, endlessly posing, hair flicking and eyeing the camera like a maniac

As for merching her tat to the Squad, @Atlusvue, do many of them have that kind of money? I don't pretend to know any, but from the level of intelligence shown in the C&P'd posts on here it really doesn't seem likely

It should be done as publicly as the accusations were. And it needs to admit they lied, where they lied, and also apologise to other people who have been caught up in their lies.

Then the RF should issue a statement that they accept the apology - and are happy to move forward but HAM will still not be WRF. If they wanted to put the knife in they could say something about trust being gone is hard to regain etc.

Just found Meghan's "Day in Toronto" piece again if anyone wants to see it ...
a strong drink to hand is advisable

I agree with @ChubbyCheeksCharlie - the press were critical of Chelsy at the time.

Here is an example https://archive.is/XrUjP

She's really fake and annoying!

I’m sorry , but the emoji has to be …. 🤮

Alternatively, 💩.

What a smug, self-promoting piece of work she has always been.

She and Sarah Ferguson have a lot in common.

So I believe ……. 😜

They were extremely critical of Catherine & The Middletons too at that time... the press have really warmed to both women since & rightly so

I don't blame Chelsy for not wanting any part of the RF, but it's a shame for H.
She is actually clever and a successful entrepreneur.
She also actually does love Africa and spends time there.
Trouble is, H wants all the trappings of the RF, the public adulation and to be a "star" whatever the hell he thinks that means, and live privately and do whatever he wants with impunity (see sentebale etc)
Cake and eat it comes to mind...
Maybe Chelsy just didn't want to be tied to such a petulant man child

I think the apology should be public but the leaking and briefing of potential apology is just more manipulation and attention seeking behaviour. Doing one of the things they need to apologise for in order to show they want to make amends? They are not sorry.

Ah, it's all making sense. Watched the entire CG piece. W and H each have 50% stake in the Diana awards. Meg is desperate to be front and centre of next award ceremony and needs William's agreement

If Chelsea is clever, there is just no way she would marry a man like H. Her life is very low key. H wouldn't live like that

Who would buy the book? Yes it would be serialised in newspapers but i can't see many buying it as we all know she is a liar and not a single word that comes out of her mouth can be believed.

Omg if she was made of chocolate she would lick herself to death.

Because I always buy from a Church which has an annual Christmas Charity shop with a large selection of different charities, I can't say I've looked much at what is on offer elsewhere, but there does seem to have been a move away from religious themed cards.
I've checked out a few outlets online - Highgrove and the Royal Palace collection have Christmas themed (snow, holly, red ribbons etc) pictures of the places themselves which does make sense.
So I looked at museums and galleries.
Royal Academy has one picture of an angel in the selection of snowy landscapes, reindeer and Christmas trees.
National Gallery as you would expect has a lovely selection, various Madonnas and /babe, a rather lovely Botticelli "Mystic Nativity", and other religious paintings as well as lots of lovely snowy landscapes by various artists.
British Museum has a very nice, fairly balanced selection, 3 out of 10 religious, a lovely. Adoration of the Magi and Illuminated Annunciation and some more modern Christmas tree infront of the museum, Holly and a couple of Japanese snow scenes.
Museum Selection a bumper pack of 40 rather lovely Renaissance Angels. They are all about bumper packs, 40 Christmas trees, 20 dutch tile skating, 30 Monet snow scenes.
National Trust lots of lovely snowy scenes and robins and Christmas trees, and one box of 10 Nativity scene plus one box of 10 JOY with a gold Angel.

Well it's not an exhaustive search, I will look in supermarkets and card as and when. My Christmas card sending has contracted significantly these days, as older relatives die off, and the price of postage makes me reconsider that annual card to friends I have more or less lost touch with. It's a shame really.

I got half way through. I'm committed to the thread but heaven help me I just can't take another single second of that video. The strongest thing I have to hand is a latte (HaM style- freeloading at Waitrose) and it isn't enough!

Send gin!

I used to work for a High Street charity, we stocked a few religious Christmas cards - unfortunately they didn’t sell well, and always amongst those which were reduced in the post Christmas sale. Indirect religious themes sold better ie Dove of Peace, Angels, and renaissance arty ones.
The lack of availability of nativity images are because they don’t sell as well as other designs - robins are always the most popular.
Market forces I’m afraid.

Exactly, Chelsy is a bright, beautiful woman who looks like she's lots of fun with a great circle of friends & a strong supportive family. She didn't need Harry, he would have been a liability to a strong, independent woman like Chelsy!

I think a particularly strong headed woman from a very solidly UC/other royal family who likes a project could potentially have formed PH into a reasonably functional adult. Think a Camilla type, I'm not saying KC3 needed a strong line held, what I mean is the Queen is a no-nonsense, stable person, like Catherine.

Chelsy is too, in a different way- strong enough to know to LTB and safeguard herself from the chaos, and I really admire her for that. She's made a beautiful and healthy life for her and her DH+DC, away from the circus of HaM.

If anyone else would like to boost the sales of this Advent calendar, you can order it for £4.75 and the calendar will be sent to the Trussell Trust on your behalf post free.

(UC here means as in upper class, not universal credit.).... although I am from a council estate and I feel that would have sorted him out in a different way....

I agree, a sincere and private apology acknowledging their lies and the pain they caused may have opened the door a wee bit but never to any kind of official 'position' of any kind w/in the RF. But I guess that the 'private' bit has already sailed since the supposed apology offer is already public.

IMHO, I don't think that article has a scintilla of truth. Contrariwise, if there is any truth in it, it's a plant by HAM to see if there's a 'positive' reaction from KC3 before they actually apologized AND they're going to want to know what they'll 'get out of it' before they do. Which is foolish because HM isn't going to comment publicly on the article and I sincerely doubt he'll contact HAM privately based on it.

Hasn't he sued some other outlet before about saying he denied Diana a house on the estate, he apparently denied her a particular one on security considerations.