Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Do you believe Charles Spencer about Charles Windsor's reported remark?

1000 replies

OneLilacHedgehog · 18/09/2026 22:10

Do you believe Charles Spencer that Charles Windsor said to him during a phone call "we'll forget her soon enough."

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
KCitsweyourHammiewevecomehomenow · 20/09/2026 09:23

At the end of the day William will be King and Charles Spencer will probably not get an invite if his carry on continues.

He and Harry can do an embittered commentary from a GB News truck outside the cathedral.

EasternStandard · 20/09/2026 09:24

pilates · 20/09/2026 09:18

The more I hear from him the more I think he has embellished the truth. The alcohol over the many years has clearly fuddled his brain. He is a weak man with a weak moral compass. H&M stayed with him over the summer. Are you telling me this wasn’t discussed? It smacks of a conspiracy which will cause further rifts with KC, William & Catherine.

Yep to all this.

3rdtimelucky73 · 20/09/2026 09:27

WizdomE · 18/09/2026 23:08

I do not believe that King Charles said that. He is a thoughtful and very considered man and highly unlikely to have uttered any negative comments about Diana after her death. It’s just not reflective of who the man is. He is actually a very kindly human being.

Have you seen how irritated he gets when a pen doesn't work?

ANNotherWriter · 20/09/2026 09:29

He even contradicts himself in the interview with LC! (I watched one minute on the BBC clip.)

He says he's 'not there' to talk about H&M .

YET in the same interview he brings them up first, as a parallel to what he thinks happened to Diana.

Utterly deluded man.

ANNotherWriter · 20/09/2026 09:31

3rdtimelucky73 · 20/09/2026 09:27

Have you seen how irritated he gets when a pen doesn't work?

Hardly the same!
Maybe you'd get irritated if a pen leaked all over you.
And you spent your life signing docs, trying to look happy when you felt ill, having cancer treatment, were in front of cameras etc etc.

pilates · 20/09/2026 09:34

I get irritated when a pen doesn’t work.

That argument is weak and boring.

prh47bridge · 20/09/2026 09:37

OneLilacHedgehog · 20/09/2026 01:23

I have been bereaved a number of times. I actually found my senses were enhanced and I took every detail in.
And frankly I fail to understand,

  1. An alternative phrase for, we'll forget her soon enough that could be misheard to this
  2. If the king did not say this, why he did not say he didn't say it. The kings statement nowhere denies he said this phrase.
  3. The kings own statement does not say that Charles Spencer misheard what the king said.

Yes, you can feel that your senses are enhanced around a stressful event like a bereavement. However, that does not mean that your memory of the event is accurate.

To say again, we don't replay our memories. We reconstruct them. And every time we reconstruct them they change a little. One of the things that happens is that we change our memory of an individual's actions and words to conform with our view of that person. That includes our memory telling us that they said things they never said and did things they never did.

Add to that this was a phone call. We are more likely to mishear and/or misinterpret things said on a phone call than when speaking face to face. Alcohol also affects memory, and Spencer is an alcoholic, albeit he is recently sober. The chances of him accurately recalling a conversation from 30 years ago are minimal.

So we don't need an answer for your point 1. I'm sure Spencer believes Charles said what he claims but, given the way memory works and Spencer's clear animosity towards Charles, that doesn't mean Charles said it or anything close to it. He may have done but, given the many independent reports of Charles' behaviour at that time, it seems highly unlikely.

And the answer to your second and third points is easy. Charles doesn't want to get into a slanging match with Spencer. If he made the specific statements you want, the press would have spun that as Charles calling Spencer a liar, which would have given the row legs.

Cathandkin · 20/09/2026 09:41

3rdtimelucky73 · 20/09/2026 09:27

Have you seen how irritated he gets when a pen doesn't work?

Is that really all you have against him?

EasternStandard · 20/09/2026 09:43

pilates · 20/09/2026 09:34

I get irritated when a pen doesn’t work.

That argument is weak and boring.

Haha yes or if there’s no working pen in the drawer.

Cathandkin · 20/09/2026 09:44

EasternStandard · 20/09/2026 09:43

Haha yes or if there’s no working pen in the drawer.

Especially when you have to sign a document, in front of the cameras, at one of the most important events of your life!

Armorlux · 20/09/2026 09:49

Helenbelena · 20/09/2026 09:21

There seem to be a lot of Royalists on this thread trying so hard to defend King Charles!

...or maybe people can recognise a liar

Obeseandashamed · 20/09/2026 09:57

The day after my dad died my aunts individually made comments about how they could at least can count on the money he lent them to pay off their mortgage/extension being written off as there was nothing formal in place to make them pay it back. 😳 This comment from KC doesn’t surprise me in the least. People say the most awful things during these times and can become vultures for self preservation and their own selfish interests. However I do think it’s pointless dragging it back up now. The media circus around these people is ridiculous.

EasternStandard · 20/09/2026 10:04

Helenbelena · 20/09/2026 09:21

There seem to be a lot of Royalists on this thread trying so hard to defend King Charles!

The brother is just cashing in on his sister, still. It’s all heightened for maximum publicity and money.

Chocolatecrispsandwine · 20/09/2026 10:05

Neither has covered themselves in glory here but I can easily believe Charles W said it and I’m certain he was glad to be rid of Diana

EmmaB1309 · 20/09/2026 10:08

I believe he might have said it or something similar, but it’s been possibly taken out of context. He and the other royals were demonised after her death, some of it deserved, and perhaps it was more of a ‘this will all be forgotten soon enough’ or ‘this will die down eventually’ sort of comment than actually meaning she would be forgotten. Wishful thinking about the situation they were in. Or maybe an old fashioned attitude to grieving, like the sooner we get over it the better sort of thinking.

ForNewHedgehog · 20/09/2026 10:58

Yes. However if he was just to come out and say that whilst he may be king he is only human and at the time there was a lot of pressure and control on how they were all expected to live our lives and that poor judgements were made and things were said in the heat of the moment that he regrets and It wasn’t my finest day then I think the general public would be a lot more understanding and it would blow the wind out of the books sales. But no let’s preserve the narrative at all costs seems to be the way it’ll fly just like always.

HoraceCope · 20/09/2026 11:00

Cathandkin · 20/09/2026 08:04

Yes, and grief and hurt make it all worse.
Plus the intervening years, and bad feelings.

and all that alcohol pickling his memory

Cathandkin · 20/09/2026 11:01

HoraceCope · 20/09/2026 11:00

and all that alcohol pickling his memory

Well, I didn't know that, but fair enough!

Vevvie · 20/09/2026 11:34

Apparently he said ‘we’ll get her soon enough’, meaning from Paris to the UK. I don’t think he’d be so nasty as to say that about the mother of his children.

Ukisgaslit · 20/09/2026 11:38

That’s nonsense

She was already back in the UK when Spencer and Charles had their phone call

Someone’s PR is hoping that line will confuse enough people .

Flufffluff11 · 20/09/2026 12:04

Vevvie · 20/09/2026 11:34

Apparently he said ‘we’ll get her soon enough’, meaning from Paris to the UK. I don’t think he’d be so nasty as to say that about the mother of his children.

I don't think the timeline fits that.
Does anyone know when the call is supposed to have been made.

The topic of the call doesn't fit that Twitter.

Earl Spencer said that him and KC were talking about them all walking behind Diana's coffin. ES did not think that Diana would want her two sons ri walk.
He said that KC then went ballistic, and ranted on about the Spencer's not doing their duty. Then he allegedly said 'don't worry we will forget her soon enough'

diddl · 20/09/2026 12:08

I think it was "rest assured".

To me it doesn't make sense to then say to her brother "she'll ne forgotten soon enough"

Why would Spencer "rest assured" about that?

OneLilacHedgehog · 20/09/2026 12:09

Flufffluff11 · 20/09/2026 12:04

I don't think the timeline fits that.
Does anyone know when the call is supposed to have been made.

The topic of the call doesn't fit that Twitter.

Earl Spencer said that him and KC were talking about them all walking behind Diana's coffin. ES did not think that Diana would want her two sons ri walk.
He said that KC then went ballistic, and ranted on about the Spencer's not doing their duty. Then he allegedly said 'don't worry we will forget her soon enough'

The call was after Diana's body had been transported from Paris. The claim makes zero sense.

OP posts:
OneLilacHedgehog · 20/09/2026 12:10

Ukisgaslit · 20/09/2026 11:38

That’s nonsense

She was already back in the UK when Spencer and Charles had their phone call

Someone’s PR is hoping that line will confuse enough people .

The pr are trying out that line to see if it fits.

I notice different things are tried out and discarded if they don't work.

The pr obviously think we are stupid plebs.

OP posts:
Thindog · 20/09/2026 12:22

ThatCyanCat · 19/09/2026 13:30

Not this rubbish again. Harry was about two when Diana met James Hewitt. They look nothing alike. Harry actually looks a lot like the young Prince Philip. There's red hair in the Spencer family and this isn't surprising given they are descended from Mary Boleyn, who was mistress to the famous redhead Henry VIII while married to William Carey so there is a good chance he fathered one or both of her children.

The real story is honestly salacious enough.

The real “rubbish” is the media promulgating the view that Harry was 2 when they met. I wonder why. Diane and Hewitt were staying together at his mother’s way before Harry was born. The people who lived and worked nearby knew.If you look at Devon newspapers from the times you read it for yourself.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.