Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Royal row between King Charles and Earl Spencer

1000 replies

Viviennemary · 16/09/2026 23:07

Buckingham Palace said they don't usually comment but they can't stay silent. Apparently Prince Charles said at the time of Diana's death rest assured we'll forget her soon enough. Which is pretty horrendous. Charles has more or less said grief had clouded Earl Spencer's judgement and memory.

I don't know why he has waited nearly 30 years to come out with this.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
Viviennemary · 17/09/2026 12:38

OneLilacHedgehog · 17/09/2026 12:33

@milveycrohn it was Diana's sister who said it was too late for her to back out. Not her mother.

One of Diana's sisters said it's too late to back out. Your face is on the teatowels.

OP posts:
OneLilacHedgehog · 17/09/2026 12:39

ThreadGuardDog · 17/09/2026 12:33

Diana died on 31st August, there was an autopsy and her body had to be flown back from France. In those circumstances six days between death and funeral is extremely short, especially given the logistics involved.

There were five 24 hour days between Diana's body landing at the airport and her funeral.

By the way, on the Sunday the boys went to church with the family. The sermon was one of the few in the land that Sunday that did not mention Diana's death. Diana's death was not mentioned once during the service.

Ohdearnotthisagain · 17/09/2026 12:40

Someone has a new book about his sister to spruik…..

OneLilacHedgehog · 17/09/2026 12:41

F63C · 17/09/2026 12:37

Not really. There is a pre defined plan for the death of all the RF and public figures with all involved knowing well ahead of time what their role is. This would have started from that first phone call.

The royal family were clear Diana was not a royal and would be having a private family funeral. The public outcry made them reconsider and I believe they did have to devise a funeral plan on the hop. From memory they used another royals plan with some minor changes.

NormasArse · 17/09/2026 12:42

gishgalloping · 17/09/2026 03:49

By all accounts Charles and Diana were on good terms before her death. He flew to Paris to bring her body home. He knew better than anyone how enormous her fame was. The family were forced to return to London from Balmoral because of the huge public reaction. It just doesn't seem likely to me that Charles said those words and I question why Charles Spencer would publish it knowing how painful it would be for William and (probably) Harry.

Why (probably)?

She was his mum.

persephoneee · 17/09/2026 12:42

OneLilacHedgehog · 17/09/2026 12:39

There were five 24 hour days between Diana's body landing at the airport and her funeral.

By the way, on the Sunday the boys went to church with the family. The sermon was one of the few in the land that Sunday that did not mention Diana's death. Diana's death was not mentioned once during the service.

If that's true (and it's possible), just shows what F'd up type of people they are. Why on earth would they not at least pray for her soul at a Christian service? There's stiff upper lip and there's something rotten in the State of Denmark.

NormasArse · 17/09/2026 12:43

OneLilacHedgehog · 17/09/2026 12:39

There were five 24 hour days between Diana's body landing at the airport and her funeral.

By the way, on the Sunday the boys went to church with the family. The sermon was one of the few in the land that Sunday that did not mention Diana's death. Diana's death was not mentioned once during the service.

Wow.

I remember being asked to read at church that day.

Noodledog · 17/09/2026 12:43

ThreadGuardDog · 17/09/2026 12:06

Yep. Agree. I remember speculation on various BBC programmes as to the reason the boys were walking behind the coffin and that there were concerns at the time that Charles would attract the anger of the public along the route of the cortège. I also remember very well a lot of speculation as to why her funeral was taking place only six days after her death. The consensus at the time was that the RF wanted it over and done with because of the continuing public scrutiny and hostility, so the alleged comment doesn’t seem so far fetched if he meant forgotten by the public.

Edited

There was undoubtably a lot of public anger, much of which was whipped up by the media who wanted to avoid their own behaviour being scrutinized IMO. However I'm not sure I would trust the reporting of the MSM- I'm sure I'm not the only person who remembers them frantically changing the narrative overnight that they had been pushing for years regarding Diana. And lets not forget it was the BBC who allowed Martin Bashir to deceive and manipulate Diana into giving that bombshell interview- lies which IMO significantly increased her feelings of paranoia and led to her refusing official security.

CandidLurker · 17/09/2026 12:44

I thought I’d read that the walking behind the coffin thing happened because Prince Philip spoke to William about it and William said he wanted to do it. I guess that Harry would have wanted to do the same as his elder brother at that time.

walking behind coffins is fairly traditional for every class of people is just that these days very few families have the coffin in a horse drawn carriage.

TeaAndTales · 17/09/2026 12:45

Puzzledandpissedoff · 17/09/2026 12:16

I remember seeing Prince Charles' face when he accompanied Diana's body back to England. I do not believe it was the face of someone who would have made that remark

Unless Spencer recorded the call we'll probably never know if Charles said it or not, @Hadalifeonce, but I wouldn't want to assume anything from his expression at the time. Just as it may have been some kind of grief, it could equally have been realisation that he'd be massively criticised and that his path to being with Camilla had just got a lot more difficult

As for the age old thing about the Queen being "dragged down to London by public opinion", what would have been wrong with making the broadcast she did from Balmoral?

Re Balmoral. I can recall the furore and people saying ‘she should be in London with her people’ and all the while she was in Scotland with her people.

OneLilacHedgehog · 17/09/2026 12:45

persephoneee · 17/09/2026 12:42

If that's true (and it's possible), just shows what F'd up type of people they are. Why on earth would they not at least pray for her soul at a Christian service? There's stiff upper lip and there's something rotten in the State of Denmark.

I remember that because it astounded me. At the time I went to church regularly and during any service people who died would be mentioned. We would all have been outraged if there were two bereaved boys present and their mother's death was not even mentioned.

It wouldn't have to be long. But mentioned in prayers at the very least. I always wondered if this omission was at the request of the royal family.

TeaAndTales · 17/09/2026 12:48

OneLilacHedgehog · 17/09/2026 12:39

There were five 24 hour days between Diana's body landing at the airport and her funeral.

By the way, on the Sunday the boys went to church with the family. The sermon was one of the few in the land that Sunday that did not mention Diana's death. Diana's death was not mentioned once during the service.

I’m sorry. I confused posters.

OneLilacHedgehog · 17/09/2026 12:50

Noodledog · 17/09/2026 12:43

There was undoubtably a lot of public anger, much of which was whipped up by the media who wanted to avoid their own behaviour being scrutinized IMO. However I'm not sure I would trust the reporting of the MSM- I'm sure I'm not the only person who remembers them frantically changing the narrative overnight that they had been pushing for years regarding Diana. And lets not forget it was the BBC who allowed Martin Bashir to deceive and manipulate Diana into giving that bombshell interview- lies which IMO significantly increased her feelings of paranoia and led to her refusing official security.

Sorry you are wrong. The media seemed taken aback by the public reaction and scrambling to catch up. This was not whipped up by the media.

There were a fair number of media articles trying to explain the public reaction. They seemed perplexed, but pumped out the photos and coverage to get the readers.

And no the narrative reported was not changed over night. This is another myth. Diana was never portrayed as a saint. People knew she had faults and yet admired her. The myth is that she was criticised before and after her death became a saint. Simply not true. Although it us true the palace stopped pushing crazy ex wife stories about her bulimia.

ThreadGuardDog · 17/09/2026 12:51

F63C · 17/09/2026 12:34

Diana did ask to stay in one of the houses on the estate. It would have worked well for her too as it's all so huge, she would have had privacy but CS refused to allow it.

Ironic that he then 'stood up for her memory' later on and the influx of money from the visitors posthumously has kept the rain out of the place.

Be careful what you post on SM - this specific issue was the subject of a legal case. What actually happened was that Diana specifically asked for The Garden house on the Althorp estate. CS turned down her request because not only was the cottage was already occupied by a staff member, but he (rightly) didn’t want the inevitable media circus to impact his children, who were very young at the time. He offered her alternative family properties, including Wormleighton Manor, but Diana herself decided not to use them. Court cases later established that claims he simply abandoned her or barred her from the estate entirely were untrue

WouldYouLikeAnyToast · 17/09/2026 12:51

Noodledog · 17/09/2026 12:43

There was undoubtably a lot of public anger, much of which was whipped up by the media who wanted to avoid their own behaviour being scrutinized IMO. However I'm not sure I would trust the reporting of the MSM- I'm sure I'm not the only person who remembers them frantically changing the narrative overnight that they had been pushing for years regarding Diana. And lets not forget it was the BBC who allowed Martin Bashir to deceive and manipulate Diana into giving that bombshell interview- lies which IMO significantly increased her feelings of paranoia and led to her refusing official security.

I'm sure I'm not the only person who remembers them frantically changing the narrative overnight that they had been pushing for years regarding Diana

I'm sure I didn't dream a newspaper front page headline literally changing overnight.
"We don't like you, Dodi!" it claimed.
Then when the papers came out the next morning all that had completely disappeared and it was all sympathy, mourning etc.
Just wish I could find it somewhere, to know I'm not going mad lol.

BrandiedAromatics · 17/09/2026 12:51

This whole thread reminds me of this, at Klosters, about the BBC royal correspondent:

Charles, POW "These bloody people. I can't bear that man. I mean, he's so awful, he really is."

Charles's communication secretary said the prince had not been looking forward to the photo call.
"He doesn't have contempt for the media. A few paparazzi yesterday got the holiday off to a bad start.

The BBC has emphasised that Mr Witchell was at Klosters at the invitation of Clarence House.
"He is one of our finest. His question was perfectly reasonable under the circumstances," a BBC spokesman said.

Take your pick, or pic'n'mix?

TygerBread · 17/09/2026 12:53

KC was dealing with the death of his children’s mother, who he had very mixed and complicated feelings about, his children’s grief, and intense public scrutiny including media pressure/obsession with seeing the children. I think the walk behind the coffin was for the media to get their money-shot and then the boys would be given some space, if that wasn’t done and their faces weren’t filmed at the funeral…the media would still have been in a frenzy trying to follow them an get ‘the first photo’ afterwards.

I think KC put them in that situation both to help them build confidence as it was a huge thing to to and also to teach them how to push themselves to protect themselves from the media by taking control while giving them what they want. I seem to remember stories in the past about the DoE talking to the boys and telling them they might regret not pushing themselves to do the difficult thing of walking behind the coffin, but wouldn’t regret doing it (which he may have been wrong about). But from that, it does appear the boys had a choice (however pressured).

Did KC make the comment? We will never know, he’s bad with words and was under immense pressure, plus Charles Spencer was wanting to argue with him, which probably came across as an accusation of being a bad father…so maybe he said the wrong thing in the moment, although maybe he didn’t, because Spencer is a known cheat/liar.

One thing for certain is that Spencer is trying to make money out of something that, is either false, or should have remained private. Apart from making money for himself, the only other outcome will be hurt for his 2 nephews, and especially for Harry as he may not be in direct contact with KC so may not be able to discuss with him his version of events and get peace of mind directly from his father.

This is one of the big problems with an inherited monarchy system…Charles has never had the level of patience/diplomacy/vocabulary etc of a natural King. In a lot of ways I have empathy for him, because he never chose this role in life, and he didn’t really even chose Diana. If he wasn’t a Prince he would have had the affair with the love of his life Camilla, waited for her marriage to break down and then married her…but at the time the Royal Family and the whole way the British constitution worked wouldn’t accept that…and he was getting to an age where the monarchy needed him to produce heirs, and that’s where Diana unwitting stepped in. I think Charles was always unhappy and between a rock and a hard place and under pressures that become more and more publicly visible, until he eventually was able to marry Camilla and in his own mind and heart put things right for himself.

It seems, publicly at least, that William has just accepted his father, including his faults, and decided to live and let live…but Harry less so.

OneLilacHedgehog · 17/09/2026 12:53

WouldYouLikeAnyToast · 17/09/2026 12:51

I'm sure I'm not the only person who remembers them frantically changing the narrative overnight that they had been pushing for years regarding Diana

I'm sure I didn't dream a newspaper front page headline literally changing overnight.
"We don't like you, Dodi!" it claimed.
Then when the papers came out the next morning all that had completely disappeared and it was all sympathy, mourning etc.
Just wish I could find it somewhere, to know I'm not going mad lol.

There was media racism aimed at dodi, this is true.

Noodledog · 17/09/2026 12:54

OneLilacHedgehog · 17/09/2026 12:50

Sorry you are wrong. The media seemed taken aback by the public reaction and scrambling to catch up. This was not whipped up by the media.

There were a fair number of media articles trying to explain the public reaction. They seemed perplexed, but pumped out the photos and coverage to get the readers.

And no the narrative reported was not changed over night. This is another myth. Diana was never portrayed as a saint. People knew she had faults and yet admired her. The myth is that she was criticised before and after her death became a saint. Simply not true. Although it us true the palace stopped pushing crazy ex wife stories about her bulimia.

Clearly we remember things very differently.

OneLilacHedgehog · 17/09/2026 12:54

BrandiedAromatics · 17/09/2026 12:51

This whole thread reminds me of this, at Klosters, about the BBC royal correspondent:

Charles, POW "These bloody people. I can't bear that man. I mean, he's so awful, he really is."

Charles's communication secretary said the prince had not been looking forward to the photo call.
"He doesn't have contempt for the media. A few paparazzi yesterday got the holiday off to a bad start.

The BBC has emphasised that Mr Witchell was at Klosters at the invitation of Clarence House.
"He is one of our finest. His question was perfectly reasonable under the circumstances," a BBC spokesman said.

Take your pick, or pic'n'mix?

Maybe we were all just confused and misheard what Charles really said?

Newname26 · 17/09/2026 12:55

F63C · 17/09/2026 12:37

Not really. There is a pre defined plan for the death of all the RF and public figures with all involved knowing well ahead of time what their role is. This would have started from that first phone call.

Even if they did revamp the funeral plan for the Queen Mother.

YankSplaining · 17/09/2026 12:56

I don’t believe Charles ever said this. Whatever his feelings about Diana were, he’s intelligent enough to realize that his family wasn’t going to forget his sons’ mother anytime soon, and he’s PR-conscious enough to realize that you don’t say something that incendiary to a grieving person.

OneLilacHedgehog · 17/09/2026 12:56

Newname26 · 17/09/2026 12:55

Even if they did revamp the funeral plan for the Queen Mother.

Ah it was her funeral plan they used! I knew they revamped some royals funeral plan. Diana was not a royal anymore and there was no official funeral plan for her.
Charles was not next of kin and had no right to prevent Diana's mother viewing her body.

noonames · 17/09/2026 12:57

Palomiino · 17/09/2026 10:56

Two things can be true. Charles Spencer doesn’t have to be a good man for him to be speaking the truth (and he is not a good man either imo).

Well exactly. KC3 doesn’t have to be a good man either, for his denial to be true. I just thought it was odd to take the line of - I believe he said it, he can’t be trusted, just look at how he treated his wife and children, when Charles Spencer is just as bad in that department, if not worse. If moral failings as a husband and father have any bearing in this he-said-he-said scenario, then surely they apply to both parties.

ThreadGuardDog · 17/09/2026 12:57

CandidLurker · 17/09/2026 12:44

I thought I’d read that the walking behind the coffin thing happened because Prince Philip spoke to William about it and William said he wanted to do it. I guess that Harry would have wanted to do the same as his elder brother at that time.

walking behind coffins is fairly traditional for every class of people is just that these days very few families have the coffin in a horse drawn carriage.

I think it’s necessary to read between the lines of the alleged reason and the actual reason, but I don’t think it can be denied that regardless of the intention, in the event, William and Harry walking behind the coffin would have discouraged the public from venting their anger at KC along the route.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.