Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

PR disasters thread 26

1000 replies

BigWillyLittleTodger · 26/07/2026 11:15

Let the conversation continue……

OP posts:
Thread gallery
80
Starryfifty · 03/08/2026 20:01

BigWillyLittleTodger · 03/08/2026 19:58

I definitely think the meeting went something like this! 😂

https://youtube.com/shorts/QPPeARVmcOY?is=44rFlalUgbRakHkD

That actress has her to a tee 🤣🤣

BigWillyLittleTodger · 03/08/2026 20:04

Starryfifty · 03/08/2026 20:01

That actress has her to a tee 🤣🤣

She’s fab isn’t she, on point every time! 😂

OP posts:
Starryfifty · 03/08/2026 20:04

Meg's birthday tomorrow. Cue loved up post of "her love" and the kids

AnAutumnCrow · 03/08/2026 20:09

MrsLeonFarrell · 03/08/2026 18:09

I missed that article upthread.

What on earth is "Meghan" or the source on about, if the quotes are accurate which they may not be of course.

The royal Instagram pages are there to publicise the work of senior working royals, not members of the family. We don't see Beatrice or Zara on there having tea with their Uncle Charles because it isn't the place for private family events.

No one stopped her posting photos of her trip, she couldn't post photos of a private royal family meeting, because no one posts those. Catherine, when she released the film celebrating the end of her cancer treatment didn't include private moments with the King, only her own parents.

Considering they managed an entire trip where no one took photos of them why does she need security? Why this talk of not being able to hold her head up high? They were invisible not bothered by the public; we are used to delusional security talk from Harry, this is new from Meghan.

What a very strange decision to let sources air all that.

I do wonder though, has Harry finally realised that financially they are sunk without his family. Jam isn't going to bring in the millions they need do reconciliation is really the only option at this point. (Which doesn't mean they'll be back as working royals, that's a separate issue)

What on earth is "Meghan" or the source on about, if the quotes are accurate which they may not be of course.

It’s so very revealing, I think, the way the tone and content of this piece (and its convoluted reasoning and misunderstandings) mirror those of the squaddies who pop up on this board.

Starryfifty · 03/08/2026 20:14

AnAutumnCrow · 03/08/2026 20:09

What on earth is "Meghan" or the source on about, if the quotes are accurate which they may not be of course.

It’s so very revealing, I think, the way the tone and content of this piece (and its convoluted reasoning and misunderstandings) mirror those of the squaddies who pop up on this board.

I think the security farce is both of them tbh. Nothing to do with paranoia. It's about status and gravitas. The only reason we do not see kids faces (yet) is, as dumb as HAM are, they know how hypocritical that would look (it's bad enough as it is) and they are still involved in some charity to do with children online.

They BOTH wanted a full walkabout with kids and bells and whistles with KC

HeddaGarbled · 03/08/2026 20:16

I don’t believe for one minute that they were physically searched. There is no way either of them would comply with that.

corblimeymlud · 03/08/2026 20:39

Starryfifty · 03/08/2026 20:04

Meg's birthday tomorrow. Cue loved up post of "her love" and the kids

You mean their love for her ! They love meeee so much.

HoldMyWine · 03/08/2026 20:51

corblimeymlud · 03/08/2026 20:39

You mean their love for her ! They love meeee so much.

Oh lord. Will it ever end?

Starryfifty · 03/08/2026 20:56

HoldMyWine · 03/08/2026 20:51

Oh lord. Will it ever end?

Alas, no 😅

Starryfifty · 03/08/2026 20:58

HeddaGarbled · 03/08/2026 20:16

I don’t believe for one minute that they were physically searched. There is no way either of them would comply with that.

Yeah, I'm wondering how that would work tbh but there's no way RF could risk it. Unless they met H briefly on his own and got assurance from him but he's not the most trustworthy either tbf. How absolutely shameful it's come to this

Kirys · 03/08/2026 21:21

Starryfifty · 03/08/2026 20:14

I think the security farce is both of them tbh. Nothing to do with paranoia. It's about status and gravitas. The only reason we do not see kids faces (yet) is, as dumb as HAM are, they know how hypocritical that would look (it's bad enough as it is) and they are still involved in some charity to do with children online.

They BOTH wanted a full walkabout with kids and bells and whistles with KC

That’s the Christmas Sandringham Church walkabout ambition!

Theunamedcat · 03/08/2026 21:25

corblimeymlud · 03/08/2026 20:39

You mean their love for her ! They love meeee so much.

Mama mountain

Starryfifty · 03/08/2026 21:27

Kirys · 03/08/2026 21:21

That’s the Christmas Sandringham Church walkabout ambition!

yep. It'll be a November full of "Hamlets so excited " KC can't wait to have HAM and hamlets with him etc etc etc

Kirschcherries · 03/08/2026 21:31

Starryfifty · 03/08/2026 19:25

The sibling rivalry is very, very odd. What is it ? Surely he realises this is completely out of his and William's control. H would have had a very prominent role in the WRF, especially considering how small the WRF is now.

Sibling rivalry exists in families and is not restricted to the RF. You either get it or you don’t.

PullTheBricksDown · 03/08/2026 21:38

Starryfifty · 03/08/2026 20:58

Yeah, I'm wondering how that would work tbh but there's no way RF could risk it. Unless they met H briefly on his own and got assurance from him but he's not the most trustworthy either tbf. How absolutely shameful it's come to this

As Highgrove is open to the public at certain times, do they maybe have integrated airport-style security? That might be useful for visits like this. No idea how you'd guard against recording devices but maybe you can jam them somehow. I imagine the royals have access to people who know these things.

bluegreygreen · 03/08/2026 21:42

Starryfifty · 03/08/2026 20:58

Yeah, I'm wondering how that would work tbh but there's no way RF could risk it. Unless they met H briefly on his own and got assurance from him but he's not the most trustworthy either tbf. How absolutely shameful it's come to this

All it really needs is for up-to-date airport-type security scanners to be built into the doorways of private areas (in addition to the security personnel and CCTV that you would expect).

Extra phones or other equipment would be picked up easily.

bluegreygreen · 03/08/2026 21:42

Cross-posted @PullTheBricksDown!

MrsLeonFarrell · 03/08/2026 21:43

AnAutumnCrow · 03/08/2026 20:09

What on earth is "Meghan" or the source on about, if the quotes are accurate which they may not be of course.

It’s so very revealing, I think, the way the tone and content of this piece (and its convoluted reasoning and misunderstandings) mirror those of the squaddies who pop up on this board.

It's very strange because none of it makes logical sense, even within the article. I wasn't allowed to take photos because of the royals, then I snuck in (non royal) Althorp. It reads as if it's written by someone with no idea whatsoever about how family, royalty or security work.

Puzzledandpissedoff · 03/08/2026 21:49

It's very strange because none of it makes logical sense, even within the article

That's why I could just about buy that it came straight from H&M, @MrsLeonFarrell; to give the wretched media their due, the things they make up are usually more credible than this

As for whether or not they were searched, @HeddaGarbled, if Harry wanted to see his father badly enough - probably to ask for more money - there's no knowing what he'd have agreed to

MrsLeonFarrell · 03/08/2026 21:50

Puzzledandpissedoff · 03/08/2026 21:49

It's very strange because none of it makes logical sense, even within the article

That's why I could just about buy that it came straight from H&M, @MrsLeonFarrell; to give the wretched media their due, the things they make up are usually more credible than this

As for whether or not they were searched, @HeddaGarbled, if Harry wanted to see his father badly enough - probably to ask for more money - there's no knowing what he'd have agreed to

Yes and the media have working knowledge of how things actually work.

StartupRepair · 03/08/2026 22:02

Lol, she is not prepared to grovel. She really doesn't get how much work they would have to do to ever be trusted beyond an annual cup of tea.

Starryfifty · 03/08/2026 22:02

With HAM, it will be relentless unfortunately. Once they get their foot in the door, it'll be "hamlets would love a relationship with their cousins" etc

Cismyfatarse · 03/08/2026 22:06

This is about family feuds and includes RF and the HAMs alongside a story about the Ramsay-Peaty and Peltz-Beckham feuds. Some cracking insights. Adam Ramsay-Peaty will reconcile — if his family ‘improve’. Hmm

https://www.thetimes.com/article/0b807826-3269-44d4-89c9-8ca351ed4c7e?shareToken=9a84b91328a4a586bf1af2e212d2b33e

Starryfifty · 03/08/2026 22:08

StartupRepair · 03/08/2026 22:02

Lol, she is not prepared to grovel. She really doesn't get how much work they would have to do to ever be trusted beyond an annual cup of tea.

Was that in the article? Stop digging HAM !

BasiliskStare · 03/08/2026 22:16

I wonder - they had a beautiful summer holiday with (let's say) J&e's luxurious Portugal holiday thing ( may not be true ) they came to the UK & Highgrove , Althorp , Billionaire's Island . All in privacy. We did not have to see M & the Hamlets. What more do they want FFS.

I do think if M is hinting at being constrained with photos etc and she may not come over here because of that , just my opinion - I think she's overplaying her hand. But I think they both have form for putting out what they want as if it were true. It's childish when you are a 40 ish yr old couple and you are trying to get what you want with one side of the family by "sources" etc.

I honestly think neither of them realise in the long run the RF will win. The grey rocking has been successful. It makes H&M look slightly loopy .😂

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.