Please or to access all these features

The royal family
Thread gallery
13
CathyorClaire · 12/09/2026 20:17

AnnunciataM · 12/09/2026 18:50

King of Belgium's younger brother was also approached by Epstein yet the answer he gave him was very different to Andrew's. Or so he now claims!

https://www.aa.com.tr/en/europe/belgium-s-prince-laurent-says-he-declined-invitations-from-epstein/3818362

Wonder if any further dumps of Epstein documents will corroborate.

simpsonthecat · 12/09/2026 20:26

Any royal will get away with anything. We know that.
Cover ups, smoke and mirrors, clever PR, and get the friendly media onside etc
There is no way to hold any royal person to account in any way shape or form we have to understand that, they are protected by the government and the media

There is nothing we can do. If AMW didn't see it off, nothing will. He was the catalyst as far as I'm concerned. Passing on confidential government papers, mixing for decades with a sex trafficker and paedophile, but none of this has had any effect on the royal family

No wonder some of us get angry. Hardly surprising!

OP posts:
BasiliskStare · 13/09/2026 12:17

@simpsonthecat I'm angry and I support a constitutional monarchy. I am still hoping he (AMW) can be arrested for misconduct in public office, I agree wholeheartedly with you on this . Going to face a judge in the US re Epstein , as I understand it he cannot be made to (someone tell me if I am wrong) .
But I wish he could be made to. As I understand it the Epstein thing and the misconduct are two different things , with different ways of bringing him to account (IANAL - please someone tell me if I am wrong) . But my choice would be he is brought to account for both . Let's start with one which is the one the UK could do if they have the evidence , and let's hope they get the evidence . I think the mood is to uncover the evidence and see where it leads.

ETA interested to see as @CathyorClaire says whether any other royal (belgian) ne'erdowell's evidence will support a case against AMW. It would be pretty to think so , as Hemingway once said.

simpsonthecat · 13/09/2026 13:32

Agree with all you say @BasiliskStare

I believe Thames valley police are looking into the misconduct in public office. At least that is better than the Met. Thames valley say their investigations are ongoing. I just hope they don't stretch it all out and hope we forget about it. The rest of it seems to have just folded, nothing happening. Surprise, not.

OP posts:
CathyorClaire · 13/09/2026 20:58

The MW email trail seems very clear.

I don't know about these things but I do wonder why anyone might seek to frame a then respected prince for treasonous activity and go on to bury it among millions of documents that might very well never have been expected to surface.

I'm calling get a move on, due process.

Kirschcherries · 14/09/2026 08:00

@BasiliskStare Its two separate cases.

Misconduct in public office is definitely for the UK courts. As it involves the Official Secrets Act any court case is highly likely to be held behind closed doors. This will be because the contents of briefings and emails maybe too sensitive to be disclosed to the public. We would get to know the outcome.

At the moment the police etc. are still gathering information, some I believe is being withheld by the US. I expect it to take several years for this to come to court. Note Rape victims can wait years to have their court cases heard.

I know many would object to a behind closed doors court case but national security comes first.

WRT Epstein primarily that is a US case. The US Government could apply to have AMW extradited but I think it is highly unlikely.

I know my view is not popular but I have never thought the poor women and men trafficked and abused would see justice.

I believe Epstein, and others, used the victims to gain “evidence” to blackmail and coerce primarily powerful men to obtain sensitive information for monetary gain. The bigger picture was bribery and corruption and the victims were treated as disposable - an awful thing to do.

I don’t think we will ever get the full truth.

If there is evidence AMW had sex with trafficked women in the UK there could be a court case. However, at the time of the offences the law was different and AMW will claim he had no idea the victims were trafficked so the CPS have no grounds on which to prosecute.

simpsonthecat · 14/09/2026 10:46

@Kirschcherries
I agree with you.
I am not sure the survivors of JE will ever see justice

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page