Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

PR Disasters thread 20

724 replies

OctopusFriend · 02/07/2026 20:13

More to chat about

OP posts:
Thread gallery
21
OctopusFriend · Yesterday 08:35

DJPJ · Yesterday 08:32

And the launch of NF and Spare was inconveniently rescheduled due to death of QE2 - and launch of As Ever (or was it WLM?) scuppered by LA wild fires.

True. Although everyone has set backs - think how many were impacted by COVID.
However, most people keep working, keep trying, show resilience and determination in the face of obstacles.
Rather than just blame others.

OP posts:
MrsLeonFarrell · Yesterday 09:19

OctopusFriend · Yesterday 08:35

True. Although everyone has set backs - think how many were impacted by COVID.
However, most people keep working, keep trying, show resilience and determination in the face of obstacles.
Rather than just blame others.

And strategic people who wanted to carve out a new life for themselves would have taken the chance in covid to really think about what they wanted to do. The main problem the Sussexes have is that everything feels spur of the moment and often reactive.

OctopusFriend · Yesterday 09:23

MrsLeonFarrell · Yesterday 09:19

And strategic people who wanted to carve out a new life for themselves would have taken the chance in covid to really think about what they wanted to do. The main problem the Sussexes have is that everything feels spur of the moment and often reactive.

Very true. They also had a lot of money and were very well known - two things that most people starting out don't have.
Wasted opportunities. I think it was generally a lack of ability, poor attitude and not taking the advice of others. Trashing the RF for money isn't a long term career move either.

OP posts:
Butteredtoast55 · Yesterday 09:38

HurrahforHollywood · Yesterday 08:16

I don't think RH covers herself in glory with that article at all.

She's a really talented performer but she's always given vibes that if she were chocolate, she'd eat herself!
She's certainly painted Edward in a very positive light!

sickofsixseven · Yesterday 09:42

OctopusFriend · Yesterday 09:23

Very true. They also had a lot of money and were very well known - two things that most people starting out don't have.
Wasted opportunities. I think it was generally a lack of ability, poor attitude and not taking the advice of others. Trashing the RF for money isn't a long term career move either.

That and the fact that unfortunately, they just aren't very likeable. They have zero "aura" as my dd would say. Its obvious now that harrys cheeky chappy persona was cooked up by the royal PR and it would have been better for him if no one got to look behind the curtain to see the bitter, spoilt manchild that he is. There's no putting that cat back in the bag. Also, despite the pr spin, most people had never heard of meghan before she dated harry, even in the US. She was a c-list actress at best

They had the world at their feet in the RF, with a lifestyle and opportunities most could only dream of, and threw it all away thinking they could be better than that. Utter delusion.

ShamedBySiri · Yesterday 09:47

Butteredtoast55 · Yesterday 09:38

She's a really talented performer but she's always given vibes that if she were chocolate, she'd eat herself!
She's certainly painted Edward in a very positive light!

I love the bit about all Edward's underwear having name tags in. 😂
It actually paints a picture of life in Buckingham Palace - like a cross between a posh boarding school and a 3* hotel. All their rooms with name cards. Communal laundry, hence the name tags. Sending down for some sandwiches. The operator putting phone calls through - or not, depending on the time of day.
No wonder they all, sensibly don't want to live there, and William and Catherine at least choosing something a bit less grand, manageable without live in staff, just having them come in daily.

MrsLeonFarrell · Yesterday 09:48

I do find it interesting that none of the other news channels picked up the security report story. They could see it wasn't worth the paper it was written on.

Butteredtoast55 · Yesterday 09:50

MrsLeonFarrell · Yesterday 09:48

I do find it interesting that none of the other news channels picked up the security report story. They could see it wasn't worth the paper it was written on.

I agree, but I also think that reflects any real scrutiny of the nonsense the Sussexes perpetuate (and currently, it's Harry spearheading that). They actually get off very lightly when it comes to media scrutiny. Perhaps that also reflects their increasing irrelevance.

DJPJ · Yesterday 09:55

sickofsixseven · Yesterday 09:42

That and the fact that unfortunately, they just aren't very likeable. They have zero "aura" as my dd would say. Its obvious now that harrys cheeky chappy persona was cooked up by the royal PR and it would have been better for him if no one got to look behind the curtain to see the bitter, spoilt manchild that he is. There's no putting that cat back in the bag. Also, despite the pr spin, most people had never heard of meghan before she dated harry, even in the US. She was a c-list actress at best

They had the world at their feet in the RF, with a lifestyle and opportunities most could only dream of, and threw it all away thinking they could be better than that. Utter delusion.

Edited

“Squandered” needs to be the title of their next book.

DJPJ · Yesterday 10:00

OctopusFriend · Yesterday 09:23

Very true. They also had a lot of money and were very well known - two things that most people starting out don't have.
Wasted opportunities. I think it was generally a lack of ability, poor attitude and not taking the advice of others. Trashing the RF for money isn't a long term career move either.

“Trashing the RF isnt a long term career move either”

Will reserve judgment on that. I wouldn’t be surprised of a pivot back to that (ever diminishing) revenue stream if KC3 doesn’t play ball. There will alway be some trashy outlet who will pay them.

Although IMHO MM is saving all the best bits for herself for her own post divorce extravaganza $$$$$$

OctopusFriend · Yesterday 10:04

DJPJ · Yesterday 10:00

“Trashing the RF isnt a long term career move either”

Will reserve judgment on that. I wouldn’t be surprised of a pivot back to that (ever diminishing) revenue stream if KC3 doesn’t play ball. There will alway be some trashy outlet who will pay them.

Although IMHO MM is saving all the best bits for herself for her own post divorce extravaganza $$$$$$

Could be! It wouldn't surprise me at all. That well hasn't run dry.

OP posts:
AnAutumnCrow · Yesterday 10:08

OctopusFriend · Yesterday 08:35

True. Although everyone has set backs - think how many were impacted by COVID.
However, most people keep working, keep trying, show resilience and determination in the face of obstacles.
Rather than just blame others.

If they'd any work ethic and talent, H&M could have set up a podcast in late March 2020 and started broadcasting immediately. Heck, they could have interviewed each other, their supposed 'friends' in LA, 'the guys back home', politicians and regular joes just trying to get through it. They could have built a very positive reputation as the good guys.

But no - they had bitter fish to fry.

bluegreygreen · Yesterday 10:15

AnAutumnCrow · Yesterday 01:03

The National Crime Agency has said, don’t post your kids’ images online in an age of AI and vile men’s imaginations.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cd7wj7d0jzzo

HAM need to think on.

Mind you, it’s a dilemma for the family of the heir, also; and for all monarchies with a lineage to legitimise and a social contract to maintain.

The advice is most of all, keep the corporeal details of young children to a minimum. No sun shining through clothes, no talk of smells, no commentary on bodies and hair and eyes … just be sensible and circumspect, school photo style, keep your settings on private.

That is, of course, what Harry was talking about when he advised parents not to put pictures of children online during his appearance on the Hasan Minhaj podcast.

OctopusFriend · Yesterday 10:15

AnAutumnCrow · Yesterday 10:08

If they'd any work ethic and talent, H&M could have set up a podcast in late March 2020 and started broadcasting immediately. Heck, they could have interviewed each other, their supposed 'friends' in LA, 'the guys back home', politicians and regular joes just trying to get through it. They could have built a very positive reputation as the good guys.

But no - they had bitter fish to fry.

Yes, they could have done well on that, it would have been a good opportunity. However, they obviously thought lying about the racism and the children's titles would be more lucrative.

OP posts:
noonames · Yesterday 10:31

bluegreygreen · Yesterday 10:15

That is, of course, what Harry was talking about when he advised parents not to put pictures of children online during his appearance on the Hasan Minhaj podcast.

Good advice, then and now. It’s a shame his wife can’t seem to get on board.

bluegreygreen · Yesterday 10:33

MrsLeonFarrell · Yesterday 07:09

Forgot to add the quote

"Another source with close links to the royal household told the Daily Mail this week that, contrary to suggestions by some, His Majesty, 77, is not desperate to build bridges with Harry, but as a compassionate man is more than willing to meet his son if that is what Harry really wants."

This is a new narrative I think.

The other problem the Sussexes have is that, whatever happens this week, on Sunday, at the end of their visit, Catherine is at Wimbledon in the Royal box with her children. That will take all the front pages immediately the Sussexes leave the country.

I wonder if someone somewhere has decided it's finally time to put a stop to the caricature of a weak king who will do whatever his son wants?

Re your other comment: I do find it interesting that none of the other news channels picked up the security report story. They could see it wasn't worth the paper it was written on.

I wonder how they decide which Sussex stories to run. I'm thinking specifically of the Australian lifeguard who was slapped by Harry while doing his job. Not a conspiracy theory, plenty of video evidence. What makes them run with the sunbather story, and totally ignore that one?

HurrahforHollywood · Yesterday 10:58

AnAutumnCrow · Yesterday 10:08

If they'd any work ethic and talent, H&M could have set up a podcast in late March 2020 and started broadcasting immediately. Heck, they could have interviewed each other, their supposed 'friends' in LA, 'the guys back home', politicians and regular joes just trying to get through it. They could have built a very positive reputation as the good guys.

But no - they had bitter fish to fry.

Bitter fish! So apposite .

Sophiecunninghamsfinger · Yesterday 11:08

MrsLeonFarrell · Yesterday 09:48

I do find it interesting that none of the other news channels picked up the security report story. They could see it wasn't worth the paper it was written on.

It was the same with the " they are coming to the Uk" story as announced by People. No one ran with that initially . The media for the most part see Harry as the manipulator he tries to be.

IcedPurple · Yesterday 11:14

sickofsixseven · Yesterday 09:42

That and the fact that unfortunately, they just aren't very likeable. They have zero "aura" as my dd would say. Its obvious now that harrys cheeky chappy persona was cooked up by the royal PR and it would have been better for him if no one got to look behind the curtain to see the bitter, spoilt manchild that he is. There's no putting that cat back in the bag. Also, despite the pr spin, most people had never heard of meghan before she dated harry, even in the US. She was a c-list actress at best

They had the world at their feet in the RF, with a lifestyle and opportunities most could only dream of, and threw it all away thinking they could be better than that. Utter delusion.

Edited

Yes, totally agree with that.

The reality is that neither is very interesting or has any special talent. Their USP was being royal, and what a USP that was! Take away the mystique of royalty and you've got two shallow, self absorbed individuals with nothing much to offer in the overcrowded celeb world.

Could they have played their cards better? Absolutely. If they'd listened to the advice of skilled experts rather than publicly venting their anger at Harry's family and the 'British media' they could perhaps have built up some sort of 'brand'. But they were never going to be billionaires or A listers outside the royal family. They simply don't have what it takes.

StartupRepair · Yesterday 11:38

If Covid hadn't happened, the HAM lack of actual talent would have emerged even sooner. I think the global disruption actually served them by obscuring how little they had to offer.

Miranda65 · Yesterday 11:51

Lunde · 03/07/2026 20:29

It is really disrespectful to Charles and also discourteous to the staff who have likely had to prepare the apartment anyway without knowing if it will even be used- just like a sulky, rude teenage student who expects his bed made-up and his favourite food in the fridge, even if he hasn't bothered to let his parents know he is coming home for the weekend.

Absolutely this. Not only is Charles elderly and still being treated for cancer, but he's the actual Head of State, the monarch. He has work to do, engagements to attend, and he can't just drop everything at the last minute to indulge his Idiot Son. It is a tricky time too, as the poor King is about to have yet another new Prime Minister.

Does Harry honestly think the King is just hanging about doing a bit of gardening, whilst waiting for the Sussexes to design to grace him with their presence?

thenightsky · Yesterday 12:02

DJPJ · Yesterday 08:29

RF never declare publicly any personal friendships with celebs - it’s too risky to risk their reputation if anything goes wrong for the celeb in the future.

Oh yes, remember all the pics of Diana and Charles with Jimmy Saville! Shock

Puzzledandpissedoff · Yesterday 12:06

AnAutumnCrow · Yesterday 10:08

If they'd any work ethic and talent, H&M could have set up a podcast in late March 2020 and started broadcasting immediately. Heck, they could have interviewed each other, their supposed 'friends' in LA, 'the guys back home', politicians and regular joes just trying to get through it. They could have built a very positive reputation as the good guys.

But no - they had bitter fish to fry.

Can't work out if that "bitter" fish is a typo or not, AnAutumnCrow Grin but either way you're right that the above really could have worked if only they hadn't thought themselves fitted for better things

As for the ever changing bilge from the media about Charles's latest thoughts, can't they just give it a rest and report on what actually happens this week? I realise the need for clicks, but it really is getting a bit silly now

Starryfifty · Yesterday 12:39

What an absolute shit show. I really hope Tuesday doesn't go his way or we'll have some deranged, word salad speech about slaying dragons.

They have both hit rock bottom. There'll be instagram updates on tea with the king etc then an interview about how wonderful it was blah blah. There's now low they won't go to

DJPJ · Yesterday 12:43

thenightsky · Yesterday 12:02

Oh yes, remember all the pics of Diana and Charles with Jimmy Saville! Shock

Absolutely and any other dodgy sleb whos illegal behaviours have come out of the woodwork since - many of them.