Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

The royal family
Thread gallery
19
straighttola · 29/06/2026 08:04

She and her family could easily set up and finance a holistic care centre if they felt that deeply about it.

straighttola · 29/06/2026 08:05

APlateOfMixedFanciesAndANicePotOfTea · 29/06/2026 08:04

while we get the bare minimum or have to break our own backs to go private, she is handed the best care imaginable

That is a gross insult to the NHS and the amazing care they, and supportive cancer charities, provide.

Not an insult, just a fact.

The NHS is struggling, the care it provides often falls below the expected standard, and doesn’t encompass a lot of extra things.

The fact so much of this extra support is provided by charities is only testament to that.

FancyBiscuitsLevel · 29/06/2026 08:05

ThatAvidViewer · 29/06/2026 07:20

What is it with people refusing to understand that William and Catherine have repeatedly said they are not going to do royal duties the old way? They don't want hundreds of patronages with endless ribbon-cutting and brief appearances. They've said time and again they want fewer patronages with greater involvement and long-term impact.
That approach also makes sense with a much smaller working Royal Family in the future. Every generation adapts and does things differently. Judging them by a model they've already said they won't follow misses the point entirely.

Why do you think I don’t understand they’ve decided not to do the job? They’ve said it in a nice flowery way, but it boils down to they don’t want to do the meet and greets with ordinary people, they don’t want to be part of local stories, opening new schools and hospitals etc unless it gives publicity to their big projects. I think that’s wrong.

Just because they’ve given advance warning they plan to be a bit shit doesn’t make it ok. Particularly because the big projects they’ve picked so far as so laughably political they have little chance of actually achieving anything.

Possiblyfamous · 29/06/2026 08:09

straighttola · 29/06/2026 08:05

Not an insult, just a fact.

The NHS is struggling, the care it provides often falls below the expected standard, and doesn’t encompass a lot of extra things.

The fact so much of this extra support is provided by charities is only testament to that.

It’s not actually a fact apart from the in the Daily Mail who love to denigrate everything. We actually have access to amazing care and treatment just delivered on plastic chairs!

I hope you haven’t had experience or ever will but if you do you’ll realise that your perception is not reality thankfully.

Recklessismymiddlename · 29/06/2026 08:12

straighttola · 29/06/2026 08:05

Not an insult, just a fact.

The NHS is struggling, the care it provides often falls below the expected standard, and doesn’t encompass a lot of extra things.

The fact so much of this extra support is provided by charities is only testament to that.

I had pneumonia 4 years ago. I ended up in hospital. The care I received was second to none. They found scarring on my lung. I’ve had 2 scans for first year then annual since to check it hasn’t grown, my last one hopefully this year. I can’t fault it. Are they stretched, yes.

But I haven’t had to pay for a single one of my scans or monitoring appointments or the fact that I’ve been left with chronic bronchitis following the pneumonia, and are now under respiratory team at the local hospital and get repeated chest infections and need frequent antibiotics due to the fact I’m on immunosuppressants for RA.

I don’t whinge others have it better than me, I just get on with it. Others have it better, others have it worse. That’s life.

straighttola · 29/06/2026 08:12

Possiblyfamous · 29/06/2026 08:09

It’s not actually a fact apart from the in the Daily Mail who love to denigrate everything. We actually have access to amazing care and treatment just delivered on plastic chairs!

I hope you haven’t had experience or ever will but if you do you’ll realise that your perception is not reality thankfully.

I work in the NHS. I know how much it’s struggling and how care is starting to fall short.

jeffgoldblum · 29/06/2026 08:14

straighttola · 29/06/2026 08:12

I work in the NHS. I know how much it’s struggling and how care is starting to fall short.

While I sincerely hope you are not patient facing with your attitude and lack of empathy!

straighttola · 29/06/2026 08:15

Recklessismymiddlename · 29/06/2026 08:12

I had pneumonia 4 years ago. I ended up in hospital. The care I received was second to none. They found scarring on my lung. I’ve had 2 scans for first year then annual since to check it hasn’t grown, my last one hopefully this year. I can’t fault it. Are they stretched, yes.

But I haven’t had to pay for a single one of my scans or monitoring appointments or the fact that I’ve been left with chronic bronchitis following the pneumonia, and are now under respiratory team at the local hospital and get repeated chest infections and need frequent antibiotics due to the fact I’m on immunosuppressants for RA.

I don’t whinge others have it better than me, I just get on with it. Others have it better, others have it worse. That’s life.

Emergency care is sometimes decent.

Meanwhile I’ve been on a specialist physio waiting list for a year now, every month my appointment gets cancelled and I’m told it’ll be rebooked, just for it to be cancelled again. I’ve had to go private as I’m no longer insured for travel.

sittingonabeach · 29/06/2026 08:18

@FancyBiscuitsLevel they do still do meets and greets but as I said above this Three Peaks challenge is doing more for Royal Marsden than turning up at the opening to cut the ribbon, and also to highlight the need for more holistic care and not just for those who can pay for it. There does seem to be that care available (from googling) but I am guessing the service is patchy and stretched like all NHS services

ThatAvidViewer · 29/06/2026 08:20

FancyBiscuitsLevel · 29/06/2026 08:05

Why do you think I don’t understand they’ve decided not to do the job? They’ve said it in a nice flowery way, but it boils down to they don’t want to do the meet and greets with ordinary people, they don’t want to be part of local stories, opening new schools and hospitals etc unless it gives publicity to their big projects. I think that’s wrong.

Just because they’ve given advance warning they plan to be a bit shit doesn’t make it ok. Particularly because the big projects they’ve picked so far as so laughably political they have little chance of actually achieving anything.

They've never said they don't want to do the job. They've said they don't want to do it the way it has always been done. Every generation adapts the role. Queen Elizabeth II did things differently from her mother, just as her mother did differently from Queen Mary.

They have also never said they don't want to do meet-and-greets. They still do them regularly. What they've said is that they want fewer patronages with deeper, long-term involvement instead of hundreds of ribbon-cutting visits.

And how can you claim they haven't achieved anything?

Catherine's Business Taskforce for Early Childhood brought together major companies that have invested millions in early childhood, expanded parental leave, funded training for the early years workforce, and created hundreds of apprenticeships.

Separately, Catherine convened 19 British brands to support baby banks across the UK. Together they donated more than 10,000 essential items—including cots, prams, nappies, clothing, bedding, toiletries, and toys—to over 40 baby banks.

She has also championed Denmark's infant mental health approach to understanding baby distress, elements of which have since been adopted in parts of the NHS.

William launched Earthshot, which has funded and scaled environmental solutions around the world, and Homewards, which is bringing together local authorities, charities, businesses, and housing providers to develop long-term plans to end homelessness.

On top of that, the Royal Foundation invested around £12 million in charitable programmes and projects last year alone. You may not like their approach, but it's simply wrong to claim they aren't doing the job or achieving anything.

Possiblyfamous · 29/06/2026 08:23

straighttola · 29/06/2026 08:12

I work in the NHS. I know how much it’s struggling and how care is starting to fall short.

Me too…

sittingonabeach · 29/06/2026 08:24

straighttola · 29/06/2026 08:04

She and her family could easily set up and finance a holistic care centre if they felt that deeply about it.

And if they did that the same posters who are moaning they don’t do that will then be moaning that they obviously have far too much money to be able to afford to do that. Or moaning that they only chose to do something in respect of cancer treatment because they are selfish as they suffered cancer, why didn’t they set up a centre for dementia sufferers, Parkinson’s, victims of DV etc etc

straighttola · 29/06/2026 08:25

ThatAvidViewer · 29/06/2026 08:20

They've never said they don't want to do the job. They've said they don't want to do it the way it has always been done. Every generation adapts the role. Queen Elizabeth II did things differently from her mother, just as her mother did differently from Queen Mary.

They have also never said they don't want to do meet-and-greets. They still do them regularly. What they've said is that they want fewer patronages with deeper, long-term involvement instead of hundreds of ribbon-cutting visits.

And how can you claim they haven't achieved anything?

Catherine's Business Taskforce for Early Childhood brought together major companies that have invested millions in early childhood, expanded parental leave, funded training for the early years workforce, and created hundreds of apprenticeships.

Separately, Catherine convened 19 British brands to support baby banks across the UK. Together they donated more than 10,000 essential items—including cots, prams, nappies, clothing, bedding, toiletries, and toys—to over 40 baby banks.

She has also championed Denmark's infant mental health approach to understanding baby distress, elements of which have since been adopted in parts of the NHS.

William launched Earthshot, which has funded and scaled environmental solutions around the world, and Homewards, which is bringing together local authorities, charities, businesses, and housing providers to develop long-term plans to end homelessness.

On top of that, the Royal Foundation invested around £12 million in charitable programmes and projects last year alone. You may not like their approach, but it's simply wrong to claim they aren't doing the job or achieving anything.

£12 million sounds a lot until you realise he’s the first billionaire king. So it’s a bit like us giving a tenner.

Possiblyfamous · 29/06/2026 08:27

Physio care etc cannot be compared to cancer care or any other acute situation. I agree that many services have been cut sadly but again from experience, my 88 yr old father had a physio assessment two weeks after seeing GP and has a six week follow up apt so perhaps is more to do with how your trust is managed rather than the NHS?

Serenster · 29/06/2026 08:42

This reply has been hidden

This reply has been hidden until the MNHQ team can have a look at it.

Lifestooshort71 · 29/06/2026 08:45

It is perfectly reasonable to point out it’s pretty crass that a couple who earn £20-24m a year are asking other people to donate money to a cause they care about, but haven’t announced a donation themselves. Particularly when our economy is in the state it is at the moment.
Yeah, I feel like this when I buy something at a corporate chain store and I'm asked if I want to round the amount up by 57p to go to charity - no ta, CEO, you donate your own billions to your cause of the week and I'll hang on to my 57p to go towards tomorrow's milk. Now that I do feel strongly about but Catherine? No, I applaud her - well done you! There sure are some nasty spiteful people on this thread (not this particular poster).

ThatAvidViewer · 29/06/2026 08:54

straighttola · 29/06/2026 08:25

£12 million sounds a lot until you realise he’s the first billionaire king. So it’s a bit like us giving a tenner.

Except he isn't a billionaire, and he isn't King yet. You're confusing the value of the Duchy of Cornwall with William's personal wealth. The Duchy may be worth around £1 billion, but William doesn't own it personally and can't sell it or treat it as his own asset.

Serenster · 29/06/2026 09:00

No idea why my post was hidden. I was just pointing out, as that AvidViwer just has, that William isn’t the King.

And that Kate was involved in all the behind the scenes preparation for this challenge while certain people were loudly shouting that she does nothing - thus demonstrating we really don’t have the faintest idea what they are up to when they are not out in public.

Mamalasira · 29/06/2026 09:01

Great work! The Three Peaks in 24 hours, it's a tough one. Good to see that she's challenging herself mentally and physically. All done without pomp and circumstance, an entourage or film crew. 👍
I've donated.

sittingonabeach · 29/06/2026 09:02

Their wealth isn’t all sitting in a bank waiting to be spent. If William sold all the Duchy estate (if he could) to another billionaire so he could build a couple of hospitals I’m sure posters would have something to say about that!

And even if they fund a new building you still need to staff it and run it for years to come

Toblerowner · 29/06/2026 09:07

I have no issue with anyone doing these challenges and doing them for charity.

BUT these type of things are definitely more about the person doing it and for the benefit of them, rather than for a charity.

I climbed Kilimanjaro in my 30s and everyone doing the climb was similar to me (back then!) - middle class fitness enthusiasts who wanted a physical challenge and something they could maybe boast about.

But these celeb challenges (sara cox etc) seem to raise huge amounts of money

straighttola · 29/06/2026 09:09

ThatAvidViewer · 29/06/2026 08:54

Except he isn't a billionaire, and he isn't King yet. You're confusing the value of the Duchy of Cornwall with William's personal wealth. The Duchy may be worth around £1 billion, but William doesn't own it personally and can't sell it or treat it as his own asset.

It still provides him with income and I suspect if it were you or I, it would be considered as an asset. Convenient it’s not for him, given he wants to sell some of it on.

derxa · 29/06/2026 09:11

CurlewKate · 29/06/2026 07:24

Easily done!🤣

Goodness what a nasty post

Housebashing · 29/06/2026 09:12

Lunde · 28/06/2026 22:28

You must be blind
-Trooping the Colour
-Garter Day
-Ascot (not the most fun day out for someone allergic to horses)
-essay on Early Childhood Education
-Visit to the Battle of Britain Memorial
plus climbing 3 mountains in 24 hours to raise money for a cancer charity

.... and that is just the past fortnight.

I would have to book off time from work to do those things as do most people.

That is not Work.

sittingonabeach · 29/06/2026 09:13

@Toblerowner but did you make the press, have people talking about it on social media? More people know about Royal Marsden trust because of her doing it than a group of work colleagues doing it.