Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Harry and Meghan offered royal accommodation

201 replies

SparklingXmas · 20/06/2026 08:47

Will they stay at Royal Lodge? I really hope it all works out for KC and to see his grandchildren would be lovely.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5yzlmkl7zzo

Harry is wearing a baby blue linen shirt and a black 'Invictus Australia' baseball cap. Meghan is wearing a darker blue and white striped shirt.

Harry and Meghan offered royal accommodation during UK visit

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are set to visit the UK with their children next month, for the first time since 2022.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5yzlmkl7zzo

OP posts:
Rhaidimiddim · Yesterday 13:10

PoppysAunt · Yesterday 12:35

I think that was when they had Netflix, Spotify, Spare, As Ever and lots of interviews.
Now, none of the above.
Meghan's Trad Wife show hasn't been renewed, As Ever isn't doing well, just like the other stuff.
So the well of plenty is drying up.

And the ANL verdict due anytime soon.

abigailll · Yesterday 13:54

Mylovelygreendress · Yesterday 13:07

According to Meghan , being in the RF was almost unsurvivable .
According to Harry , it wasn’t safe to bring his wife and DC to the U.K. That BP wasn’t secure enough (!). Also , that the RF had to apologise to Meghan.
So @LipglossAndLies that’s why people are speculating about the reason for staying in Royal accommodation.
KC and QC will be in Scotland . The Wales family will keep their distance .
It is possible that B and E will meet them but I would imagine they want to keep William onside so might be busy that week !

So unsurvivable and unsafe that they rocked up with their two young DC for Jubilee - and splashed Lili face across global media and hosted her 1st Bday in Windsor? That bad?

Mylovelygreendress · Yesterday 14:17

abigailll · Yesterday 13:54

So unsurvivable and unsafe that they rocked up with their two young DC for Jubilee - and splashed Lili face across global media and hosted her 1st Bday in Windsor? That bad?

You are letting pesky facts get in the way of the Sussex truth !!

Allseeingallknowing · Yesterday 15:02

PoppysAunt · Yesterday 08:04

They can't afford a hotel anymore. They're like those awful relatives turning up to stay and you can't say no.

Harry is worth millions . He’ll never be without money. When his father dies he will get a huge inheritance.

jeffgoldblum · Yesterday 15:21

Allseeingallknowing · Yesterday 15:02

Harry is worth millions . He’ll never be without money. When his father dies he will get a huge inheritance.

No he won’t , the monarch leaves it to the next monarch, it’s why they don’t pay inheritance tax.

NotTalkinBoutTheLinen · Yesterday 15:24

Allseeingallknowing · Yesterday 15:02

Harry is worth millions . He’ll never be without money. When his father dies he will get a huge inheritance.

I think their outgoings could easily outpace their income. Between security and property maintenance they can easily be into $4M annually.

Allseeingallknowing · Yesterday 15:28

NotTalkinBoutTheLinen · Yesterday 15:24

I think their outgoings could easily outpace their income. Between security and property maintenance they can easily be into $4M annually.

There are two of them! Diana left him millions , some of which was probably invested.

Allseeingallknowing · Yesterday 15:30

jeffgoldblum · Yesterday 15:21

No he won’t , the monarch leaves it to the next monarch, it’s why they don’t pay inheritance tax.

I heard this morning Charles will will include his children, it’s already made, as did the late Queen’s

Allseeingallknowing · Yesterday 15:34

It’s at the Kings discretion whether he leaves anything to Harry, apparently he has. Even without any inheritance from the King, Harry was left secure with money from Diana and the Queen Mother. If it’s been squandered, tough!

NotTalkinBoutTheLinen · Yesterday 15:35

Allseeingallknowing · Yesterday 15:28

There are two of them! Diana left him millions , some of which was probably invested.

Two people?

If he has $30M invested he can depend on 4% a year but that’s not even close to enough.

I don’t think Meghan had more than$5M when they met.

They have to earn in order to live the lifestyle they've chosen. It’s a joke to say they can’t afford a hotel but they do need to be cautious.

Tontostitis · Yesterday 15:41

Dollymylove · 20/06/2026 09:53

An utterly sleazeball Andrew may be but there is no evidence of him being a paedophil

This is very true and I'm always surprised that Mumsnet allows the false pedo accusation to keep being repeated secondly why do Harry and Meghan fans always feel the need to bring Andrew into it? is that their real only defense of Harry and Meghan that they're not as bad as Andrew? I find it incredibly suspicious that neither Harry nor Meghan have ever said anything at any point about the Andrew situation it just low level confirms to me that she did know him and was probably connected to him previously. It is the only explanation for the deafening silence when they constantly weigh in on anything they possibly can and slate the royals for anything they possibly can.

BigWillyLittleTodger · Yesterday 15:47

LipglossAndLies · Yesterday 12:32

You sre when you say they can't afford a hotel yet offer no proof of this just making it up...but if you aren't show it then

Oh stop with your constant silly demands of proof every time someone says something you don’t like, just so you know this is a chat forum, where you know, people chat, it’s not a court of law and you ain’t no barrister.

PoppysAunt · Yesterday 15:51

abigailll · Yesterday 13:54

So unsurvivable and unsafe that they rocked up with their two young DC for Jubilee - and splashed Lili face across global media and hosted her 1st Bday in Windsor? That bad?

Yes, that bad!

PoppysAunt · Yesterday 15:51

BigWillyLittleTodger · Yesterday 15:47

Oh stop with your constant silly demands of proof every time someone says something you don’t like, just so you know this is a chat forum, where you know, people chat, it’s not a court of law and you ain’t no barrister.

🤣🤣

PoppysAunt · Yesterday 15:52

Allseeingallknowing · Yesterday 15:34

It’s at the Kings discretion whether he leaves anything to Harry, apparently he has. Even without any inheritance from the King, Harry was left secure with money from Diana and the Queen Mother. If it’s been squandered, tough!

I'm amazed he'll be left anything at all the way he's carried on.

jeffgoldblum · Yesterday 15:54

Allseeingallknowing · Yesterday 15:30

I heard this morning Charles will will include his children, it’s already made, as did the late Queen’s

Well you heard wrong! The queen left it to Charles and he will leave it to William!

PoppysAunt · Yesterday 15:55

Allseeingallknowing · Yesterday 15:02

Harry is worth millions . He’ll never be without money. When his father dies he will get a huge inheritance.

Sorry, it was a joke about hotel, but I'm just making a point about all their projects ending or being unsuccessful! Harry always stayed in a hotel before, but apparently not this time.

BigWillyLittleTodger · Yesterday 15:55

Allseeingallknowing · Yesterday 15:02

Harry is worth millions . He’ll never be without money. When his father dies he will get a huge inheritance.

You will upset @LipglossAndLies with this post, you have to provide proof, bank statements preferably and a copy of King Charles’s will.

Allseeingallknowing · Yesterday 15:56

jeffgoldblum · Yesterday 15:54

Well you heard wrong! The queen left it to Charles and he will leave it to William!

If you do your research, you’ll see it’s up the sovereign’s discretion. Yes, the bulk does go to the next monarch but they can also make provision for other children

jeffgoldblum · Yesterday 15:58

BigWillyLittleTodger · Yesterday 15:55

You will upset @LipglossAndLies with this post, you have to provide proof, bank statements preferably and a copy of King Charles’s will.

They can’t! The wills are sealed, nobody knows what is in them , so any claims made are just speculation with no foundation of truth.

jeffgoldblum · Yesterday 16:01

Allseeingallknowing · Yesterday 15:56

If you do your research, you’ll see it’s up the sovereign’s discretion. Yes, the bulk does go to the next monarch but they can also make provision for other children

Trusts can be made before they pass , but absolutely nobody in this country apart from those concerned and the lawyers will have that information!
so whoever you have been listening to has absolutely no credible information and is merely speculating and if the source was the lawyer then they are about to be in serious legal trouble themselves for breaking the law!

so do please reveal who told you this information.

Gonnagetgoingreturnsagain · Yesterday 16:06

Tontostitis · Yesterday 15:41

This is very true and I'm always surprised that Mumsnet allows the false pedo accusation to keep being repeated secondly why do Harry and Meghan fans always feel the need to bring Andrew into it? is that their real only defense of Harry and Meghan that they're not as bad as Andrew? I find it incredibly suspicious that neither Harry nor Meghan have ever said anything at any point about the Andrew situation it just low level confirms to me that she did know him and was probably connected to him previously. It is the only explanation for the deafening silence when they constantly weigh in on anything they possibly can and slate the royals for anything they possibly can.

Yes you’d think they’d say something about beloved uncle Andy so their silence speaks volumes. We all know Meg was a yacht girl too.

jeffgoldblum · Yesterday 16:09

Gonnagetgoingreturnsagain · Yesterday 16:06

Yes you’d think they’d say something about beloved uncle Andy so their silence speaks volumes. We all know Meg was a yacht girl too.

There is no evidence to support that rumour about Meghan .

BigWillyLittleTodger · Yesterday 16:10

Allseeingallknowing · Yesterday 15:28

There are two of them! Diana left him millions , some of which was probably invested.

No one is saying they are on the bones of their arse, clearly they are wealthy but wealthy people still live beyond their means, you see it on here all the time posters on 200k a year saying they are struggling, that’s because the lifestyle they have chosen, large house, private schooling is crippling them, same for Harry and Meghan they just don’t have the amount of money for the lifestyle they want to live, their house is small in comparison to A listers who also have multiple homes across the globe, they are the poor relations in Montecito. The house is a massive clue, it’s dated, old fashioned and looks as though it was last decorated in the 90’s, the kitchen is a prime example. Normally that house would have been knocked down and been rebuilt if someone with real money had bought the plot, that’s what the seriously wealthy do, Adele knocked down Sylvester Stallone’s house that she purchased and rebuilt for example. Harry and Meghan’s running costs just to stand still have been estimated at between four to six million dollars a year before they even get up for breakfast, the money pool is running dry, hence hot footing it home to Daddy Warbucks.

IcedPurple · Yesterday 16:15

PoppysAunt · Yesterday 12:36

Yes, it's hardly a peer reviewed journal, is it! 😂

I know! It cracks me up when people demand 'proof' and 'evidence'!

This is basically gossip, not a PhD dissertation. Of course it's speculation!