Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Footage of Charlotte

469 replies

Aspecialkindofhell · 02/05/2026 17:14

Does anyone else feel really uncomfortable about the photos the RF have put out of Charlotte today? Likewise the photo of them all lying in the sand. I feel those photos should be personal . She’s only 11, on holiday and those moments should be private.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
Crispynoodle · 02/05/2026 22:51

PrincessofWells · 02/05/2026 17:47

Charlotte was at our local leisure centre taking part in a trampoline competition recently and it was all very normal, even though Catherine was there. They are having a pretty well adjusted upbringing in comparison to Charles.

That’s lovely to hear

Calliopespa · 02/05/2026 22:53

Noodledog · 02/05/2026 22:47

I agree, it's getting a bit "girls must cover up to avoid exciting men/ peadophiles". Bloody hell, she's dressed perfectly normally for a girl in summer. Can we please not curtail girls' freedom to be children because some men are disgusting perverts?

And Louis had a video the other day, yet OP seems at ease with that. The whole thread premise is weird.

The children could not look more like normal children in everyday attire for children their age, doing normal things.

Decacaffeinatednow · 02/05/2026 22:55

Is it ever going to happen that a thread about the RF can not have a post about Meghan? She is shoehorned into everything 😖

sunflowersintheday · 02/05/2026 22:58

Calliopespa · 02/05/2026 22:53

And Louis had a video the other day, yet OP seems at ease with that. The whole thread premise is weird.

The children could not look more like normal children in everyday attire for children their age, doing normal things.

Exactly. All the children looked happy and relaxed, enjoying the fresh air, no formal clothes, just having fun in the outdoors.
yes, even in shorts!

HelenaWilson · 02/05/2026 22:59

Absolutely, compare it to andrew and Sarah’s,

A very quick Google shows that that's from a Victorian themed party for Beatrice's 18th birthday. Not comparable with an 11yo on a family beach holiday.

BigWillyLittleTodger · 02/05/2026 23:07

FancyBiscuitsLevel · 02/05/2026 19:59

I know what you mean OP- we’ve moved on a lot in the last 20 years with exposing children to press attention and this does seem a little wrong. We shouldn’t really know what the kids look like. There’s no need for them to do official engagements or photo shoots.

I wonder if when George is a parent, his children will be kept away from the public eye.

If William and Catherine did as you suggest then that would be incredibly terrible parenting, not preparing a child who will be King and Head of State of the UK and its realms for public life, not being seen until he was an adult is a preposterous suggestion, same for his brother and sister who wether they are working royals when they become adults or not will still have a public profile, all of the European royals prepare their children in a similar way, in fact in some cases I would say they are introduced to public life more frequently than the Wales children. William and Catherine seem to be doing an excellent job of preparing their children for their future roles, yet protect them at the same time, well done them.

BigWillyLittleTodger · 02/05/2026 23:13

Decacaffeinatednow · 02/05/2026 22:55

Is it ever going to happen that a thread about the RF can not have a post about Meghan? She is shoehorned into everything 😖

Well considering Meghan shoehorns her children into her Instagram posts at every available opportunity to sell her tat, it is perfectly acceptable for posters to talk about it in relation to royal children’s pictures.

HelenaWilson · 02/05/2026 23:21

We shouldn’t really know what the kids look like. There’s no need for them to do official engagements or photo shoots.

But it's not possible to hide them from public view. There are all sorts of occasions when they might be photographed or in the public eye. Normal events or outings such as weddings when Charlotte might be a bridesmaid or the boys might be pageboys or Charlotte going to Wimbledon with Catherine or George to the football with William. And big occasions such as the Coronation, which it would have been wrong to exclude them from, if they wanted to be there.

wordler · 03/05/2026 01:53

Aspecialkindofhell · 02/05/2026 17:22

A photo shoot where she is performing for the camera only and not just a family holiday? I wouldn’t say it was a photo shoot for PR purposes only and if it is that’s even worse really.

I don’t know if you remember William and Harry’s childhood - in return for privacy in general they used to invite the press for photo shoots a few times a year - holidays big life events etc.

So they had to face these huge press banks of photographers - dozens of them at a time.

William and Kate shook up that whole model by either taking the photos themselves or inviting one photographer to come and do a day with them - they take all the photos for the year in one go - kids birthdays, Father’s Day, anniversaries, sometimes even Christmas.

So the kids get one day with one friendly photographer a year and their parents get total editorial control over the pics release.

They’ve used Matt Porteus - who did these recent ones many times which is why the pics seem so relaxed they all know him well.

His specialty is acting ocean and underwater images not Royal portraits - ha regular shots are amazing.

Jellybelly80 · 03/05/2026 02:09

sunflowersintheday · 02/05/2026 22:43

Oh dear god. That's an embarrassment.

It was taken at a fancy dress themed birthday party.

PollyBell · 03/05/2026 02:21

I would say at 11 she is able to have more say than the public on what happens to her footage?

Isitvintage · 03/05/2026 02:26

Don’t the royal family belong to the public in some way? Isn’t that what prince Harry has been complaining about for the past couple of years?

sunflowersintheday · 03/05/2026 06:03

Isitvintage · 03/05/2026 02:26

Don’t the royal family belong to the public in some way? Isn’t that what prince Harry has been complaining about for the past couple of years?

No they don't. They have human rights like everyone else.
Harry says a lot of things, I wouldn't credit him as a reliable source.

sunflowersintheday · 03/05/2026 06:05

wordler · 03/05/2026 01:53

I don’t know if you remember William and Harry’s childhood - in return for privacy in general they used to invite the press for photo shoots a few times a year - holidays big life events etc.

So they had to face these huge press banks of photographers - dozens of them at a time.

William and Kate shook up that whole model by either taking the photos themselves or inviting one photographer to come and do a day with them - they take all the photos for the year in one go - kids birthdays, Father’s Day, anniversaries, sometimes even Christmas.

So the kids get one day with one friendly photographer a year and their parents get total editorial control over the pics release.

They’ve used Matt Porteus - who did these recent ones many times which is why the pics seem so relaxed they all know him well.

His specialty is acting ocean and underwater images not Royal portraits - ha regular shots are amazing.

That's a sensible approach. When you see the birthday/anniversary pictures you can tell they're from the same shoot
George's birthday is next.

Charlenedickens · 03/05/2026 06:40

We don’t know. But it does look like those kids are having a happy well adjusted childhood , as much as it possible, away from the limelight. I like the fact their parents prepare them for what’s ahead by taking them to royal events, doing sporadic images etc that they control. and that the media respect the deal and don’t publish any candid images of them.

I recall years ago someone published images of the nanny in the park with them, the parents were away and they just showed her, saying she was with them and named the park, and that’s never been repeated either, it was right on the line in terms of the agreement and was an invasion. As people could them have went and waited see if they turn up again.

I also like the fact Charlotte is wearing nail polish, all of them dressed like normal kids their age. They all appear to interact normally and lovingly with their parents when you see them at events, I recall one event, where Louis ran over and sat on Charles knee.

ive no idea why the op seems to have taken issue with a female in shorts. But I think many of us hoped it wasn’t a concerning girls must be covered up thing. The world has moved on and females should be supported to wear as they please.

sunflowersintheday · 03/05/2026 06:45

I like the fact that Charlotte goes with her Mum to swimming and trampolining events, and enjoys privacy to do so.

CurlewKate · 03/05/2026 07:19

sunflowersintheday · 03/05/2026 06:45

I like the fact that Charlotte goes with her Mum to swimming and trampolining events, and enjoys privacy to do so.

I wonder what Catherine does during the looooooong waits between Charlotte's routines at trampoline competitions. Presumably she doesn’t just hang around with the other mums…

Charlenedickens · 03/05/2026 07:42

CurlewKate · 03/05/2026 07:19

I wonder what Catherine does during the looooooong waits between Charlotte's routines at trampoline competitions. Presumably she doesn’t just hang around with the other mums…

Why not?

Roads · 03/05/2026 07:44

CurlewKate · 03/05/2026 07:19

I wonder what Catherine does during the looooooong waits between Charlotte's routines at trampoline competitions. Presumably she doesn’t just hang around with the other mums…

Why wouldn't she? She's just another mum taking her kid to a sporting event at the weekend. I imagine she does exactly the same as what all the other mums do at these events. Confused

FancyBiscuitsLevel · 03/05/2026 07:53

IcedPurple · 02/05/2026 22:13

We shouldn’t really know what the kids look like. There’s no need for them to do official engagements or photo shoots.

George is going to be King one day, assuming the Monarchy survives that long. His siblings, even if not working royals, will frequently be in attendance at public events.

Yet you're suggesting they be completely hidden from public view until reaching adulthood? That they never attend fun events such as Wimbledon or Trooping until they're 18? That would be very weird, not least for George, Charlotte and Louis themselves.

Yes - they aren’t working royals now, it’s not a given that Charlotte and Louis will be working royals and the history of both Andrew and Harry should make the royal family reject the idea that the “spares” should be working royals. It’s very clear having anyone other than the heir as a working royal only is a good idea until the heir is married with children.

When the royal children are over 18, if they want to become working royals then they should be introduced to the public. There is no need other than nosiness for us to know what they look like now. The should not be doing public engagements now.

All of the children should get a choice.

myrtleWilson · 03/05/2026 07:53

CurlewKate · 03/05/2026 07:19

I wonder what Catherine does during the looooooong waits between Charlotte's routines at trampoline competitions. Presumably she doesn’t just hang around with the other mums…

What an odd presumption. Why wouldn’t she? She’s reportedly to be on the parents WhatsApp group, hosted play dates etc. What makes you think she wouldn’t be chatting to the other parents at trampolining?

sunflowersintheday · 03/05/2026 07:53

CurlewKate · 03/05/2026 07:19

I wonder what Catherine does during the looooooong waits between Charlotte's routines at trampoline competitions. Presumably she doesn’t just hang around with the other mums…

Why not? She probably chats to them, they'll be the mums of her daughter's friends. She doesn't seem arrogant or stand offish to me.

sunflowersintheday · 03/05/2026 07:54

myrtleWilson · 03/05/2026 07:53

What an odd presumption. Why wouldn’t she? She’s reportedly to be on the parents WhatsApp group, hosted play dates etc. What makes you think she wouldn’t be chatting to the other parents at trampolining?

I agree! It's a very odd assumption. I think both her and William are very hands on parents.

FancyBiscuitsLevel · 03/05/2026 08:00

BigWillyLittleTodger · 02/05/2026 23:07

If William and Catherine did as you suggest then that would be incredibly terrible parenting, not preparing a child who will be King and Head of State of the UK and its realms for public life, not being seen until he was an adult is a preposterous suggestion, same for his brother and sister who wether they are working royals when they become adults or not will still have a public profile, all of the European royals prepare their children in a similar way, in fact in some cases I would say they are introduced to public life more frequently than the Wales children. William and Catherine seem to be doing an excellent job of preparing their children for their future roles, yet protect them at the same time, well done them.

Sorry you appear to be suggesting William is likely to die in the next 5-6 years. Realistically, George will most likely have decades as an adult to learn how to carry out public events as an adult.

Harry and Andrew should be cautionary tales for the assumption that Charlotte and Louis will be working royals and that won’t cause new problems.

Aspecialkindofhell · 03/05/2026 08:04

Just to be clear. They are lovely photos and videos. I think W and K seem to be doing a fantastic job. I think all the kids seem incredibly well adjusted and happy . I suppose I just wonder if some of those photos of a beautiful pre pubescent girl might be viewed in the wrong way by the wrong sort of person. Maybe I’m just being really paranoid. That’s what the shorts comment was about.
I didnt realise that the family had used an official photographer. Kate has taken a lot of photos herself of family holidays in the past , but obviously the shot of them lying down was taken by someone else.

OP posts: