Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Is ANDREW really Prince Phillips son.

354 replies

roadtowhoknowswhere · 19/02/2026 19:27

I have thought of this for a while.
Charles, Anne and Edward have longer faces while Andrew has more of a roundish face.
Pity an DNA test can't be done.
Rumours used to go round that one of the queen's race horse trainers might be his father.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
VK456 · 20/02/2026 22:12

TheBroonOneAndTheWhiteOne · 19/02/2026 19:34

That isn't helpful unless they've also taken Philip's DNA...........

As an aside, Philip donated his DNA to help identify the bodies of the Romanovs

Bitteralmond · 20/02/2026 22:14

TheBroonOneAndTheWhiteOne · 19/02/2026 19:34

That isn't helpful unless they've also taken Philip's DNA...........

I believe his DNA was used to disprove the claims of a Polish peasant woman who claimed her whole life that she was the Russian Princess Anastasia. Presumably his DNA is still around somewhere.

DuchessofReality · 20/02/2026 22:18

Changedname9999 · 20/02/2026 21:52

If Charles isn’t Philip’s son then he is not king. That’s protocol!!

Nonsense.

Firstly, he is crowned. So he is the king.

Secondly, he is the son of the monarch, born while she was married.

And he is Philip’s son. As I explained. Legally, the father of a child is the husband of the mother. Unless that husband wants to dispute that. Which, since Philip is dead, won’t happen.

And, the chance that the Queen, knowing she was next in line to the throne, cheating on her husband before she had a child, is zero.

DuchessofReality · 20/02/2026 22:20

MeTooOverHere · 20/02/2026 22:05

So does that explains how Henry Tudor became King? Not of royal blood but the legitimate child of the second marriage of the widowed Queen.

Pre Act of Settlement so not relevant these days.

likelysuspect · 20/02/2026 22:20

MeTooOverHere · 20/02/2026 22:05

So does that explains how Henry Tudor became King? Not of royal blood but the legitimate child of the second marriage of the widowed Queen.

Henry Tudor who was Henry VII?

He was the son of Margaret Beaufort who technically had royal blood. But he became king because he beat Richard III.

Changedname9999 · 20/02/2026 22:21

Ducksbehindthesofa · 20/02/2026 19:16

My Mum was mixed-race, and my Dad was Irish with fair skin and jet-black hair. Both were tall and if they turned sideways, you might not see them.

My brother is 6'6 with the blackest hair and olive skin, brown eyes, resembles a beanpole. My sister is 5'8 with dark brown hair, brown eyes and a decent gust of wind has her off her feet. Me? I'm short, fat and blonde (with definite ginger tendencies) and a tornado couldn't knock me off my trotters.

I know I came from them. A childhood disease meant all of us were genetically tested for a hopeful match (there was).

Genes are funny old things, and definitely prone to throwing a spanner out of the pool from time to time.

Completely irrelevant

Changedname9999 · 20/02/2026 22:24

i think queen was very unhappy in early marriage. There is a very big possibility that Charles and Andrew were not conceived in that marriage. Constitutionally that means a lot.

Changedname9999 · 20/02/2026 22:25

Them not being legitimate means what really constitutionally? Goodness knows

Changedname9999 · 20/02/2026 22:26

I would say test them both.

Changedname9999 · 20/02/2026 22:57

Is their links to Savile the reason saville was so protected?

RainbowBagels · 20/02/2026 23:10

Changedname9999 · 20/02/2026 22:24

i think queen was very unhappy in early marriage. There is a very big possibility that Charles and Andrew were not conceived in that marriage. Constitutionally that means a lot.

Charles was born less than a year after the marriage and she was heir to the Throne. No way would Phil have tolerated his son not being the one on the throne, not to mention Harry looks like Phil. There are rumours they were more or less separated from the late 60's but TLQ and Phil were living together in Malta without their children in be early marriage, not to mention she had married him against the wishes of her family. A couple of months in, I doubt she was shagging someone else. I doubt either of them were illegitimate but Charles- no way.

Changedname9999 · 20/02/2026 23:14

Whatever lol….

Changedname9999 · 20/02/2026 23:18

I am sure you’re right. He’s such a dick that i am sure they both parented him!! Not Andrew though. He’s also a dick but he’s got different father. And no real emotional connection to Charles.

jeffgoldblum · 20/02/2026 23:29

Allthatwegotisthispalebluedot · 20/02/2026 20:22

where was the expectation that her behaviour was ‘beyond reproach’ when she paid £12million to make the sexual assault allegations ‘go away’?

Keep up ! The new narrative is that it was Charles and others now!!! 🙄

MsDitsy · 20/02/2026 23:31

Nope, don't see it.

Is ANDREW really Prince Phillips son.
Changedname9999 · 20/02/2026 23:31

The Epstein files are too horrible. What they did is horrendous. I am switching off from this. Bye

beadystar · 20/02/2026 23:53

I looked at some younger pictures of Lord Porchester and if you compare them with a young Andrew, I think it’s possible. Either way, he’s favoured his mother so much as he’s aged it’s hard to really guess. It’s also funny that he’s the only one of the brothers who has retained a full head of hair. TLQ was in her 30s having him, no longer the starry-eyed young bride.. PP was away for long chunks of time. As rumoured, maybe their marriage was rocky for a while.

Atsocta · 21/02/2026 00:01

I’ve never doubted Andrew being Philips , but Their a very secretive tight nit bunch … lot of goings on, my uncle ex army used to drive Diana, said many went in and out in the boot of a cars, Diana was a sweetheart too good to be stuck with them, seemed Our now queen chose Diana to marry Charlie as she was a shy and put up with anything her downfall was she started to speak out and the rest is history.. Bless her .

MeTooOverHere · 21/02/2026 00:02

Changedname9999 · 20/02/2026 22:24

i think queen was very unhappy in early marriage. There is a very big possibility that Charles and Andrew were not conceived in that marriage. Constitutionally that means a lot.

Have you not looked at their dates of birth?

Calliopespa · 21/02/2026 00:35

cerealmover · 20/02/2026 19:30

Harry looks more and more like Charles and Philip as he gets older and has the close set eyes. William looks nothing like Charles yet no-one questions his parentage. William looks more a mix of Edward/Andrew, and Diana. George looks more like Charles Spencer

I always thought Anne and Andrew took after the Queen, while Charles and Edward more like Philip. Looking at that photo of Lord Porchy, it looks just like Peter Phillips, not Andrew.

And have a look at Andrew's little grandson August: spitting image of Harry at that age.

Atsocta · 21/02/2026 00:36

ginasevern · 20/02/2026 18:19

Harry was born on 15 September 1984. Diana did not begin her affair (or even meet) James Hewitt until late in 1987. Those are facts.

Who mentioned James Hewitt ?

JustAnotherWhinger · 21/02/2026 00:37

MsDitsy · 20/02/2026 23:31

Nope, don't see it.

I think in that one Porchester is actually the double of Mark Phillips!

jeffgoldblum · 21/02/2026 00:38

JustAnotherWhinger · 21/02/2026 00:37

I think in that one Porchester is actually the double of Mark Phillips!

I think he looks like an elderly balding Hugh grant!

Atsocta · 21/02/2026 00:40

There’s only one Royal I quite like now and that’s Anne
Now beginning to think we’d be better off as a country without them.

Atsocta · 21/02/2026 00:53

Buck house was a knocking shop and we’re paying for it ..all very wrong when the counties people are struggling, homeless, and Jobless, while they take the P and play with money, and mansions like it’s a monopoly game.

Swipe left for the next trending thread