What is likely to happen to the Sussexes?

[fairmaidofutopia]

When the money stops flowing in? They are finished as a brand, MM has nothing original to offer and is tainted with the toxicity that has surrounded them. She personally has ‘bullying’ allegations and high staff turnover as well as her blatant dishonesty. There is evidence that they are no good at making podcasts / documentaries etc so no big income there. There is increasing ‘interest’ from US authorities into their financial dealings … what next? Surely KC3 won’t fund them, so how will they keep going?

@Benjithedog i think there are deflection practices going on here by you. The post in question has been deleted and it seems rightly so but you seem to think it is @simpsonthecat job to defend you. Maybe continuing to talk about this is deflecting away from the shitshow that is the oh so great RF.

I’m sorry you find it puzzling Curlew but thank you for your other comment

Ok. I've got it. I am not blindly supporting you, so you attack me as being 'transport' (I presume you mean transparent) and 'flinging out unsubstantiated comments'.
Move on from me please, this is getting boring!

I wasn't there, I didn't see it. Seriously, do contact mnhq about the poster who wrote it as you are obviously upset about it.
(Page 6 is irrelevant, it depends on a person's settings as to how many posts per page is set)

Again read my comment properly. They asked for an example and I gave it to them. I’ve made it clear I didn't want them defending me I’m not 12. I asked a broad question

I presume Harry will now not want any member of the Royal Family, including the King to attend Invictus In Birmingham considering they are apparently all culpable in covering up for Andrew.

Are you having problems with comprehension today Simpson? Pretty sure I said I don’t expect you to defend me but nice to see you ignored that part. Your just proving my point.

Correct - he just wants the benefits .

why attack Simpson for something another poster did. very strange.

Have you spoken to H and he has told you this or are these just further deflection practices going on by the royalist fans.

So many threads about the Sussexes since the AMW scandal!

This is as reasonable thing to say as much of what I read on here about Harry and Meghan being billionaires etc.

How can anyone read it or AI search it (whatever that means) if it has been deleted?

Well, yes.... apparently I am too transparent, I fling out unsubstantiated comments and now I'm having problems with comprehension.

This is when it's best to just ignore and move on from these attacks for no reason, which is what I will do.

Onward and upward!

How extremely arrogant of you to think you know about what goes on between KC and Harry. They are not just king and prince, they are father and son, and have a history that you know nothing about.

For you to even suggest that a reconciliation between KC and Harry is silly is utterly, utterly bizarre.

Exactly. the original heir to the throne before George VI was Edward VIII and Harry's great uncle, and he had fascist sympathies and was cosy with Oswald Mosley.

Situational racism ? Really?

It’s a perfectly valid question to ask considering this thread is about the Sussexes, posters on this very thread have stated that they left due to the cover up of Andrew by the whole royal family, so why would Harry want any members, including the King remotely associated with him, his family or any of his work. I am not the one deflecting, you just find it an uncomfortable question and would rather it wasn’t discussed.

Harry used the terms ”ragheads” and “paki” about his fellow soldiers not the enemy.

There certainly seems to be a great deal of frothing going on at the momentv@BigWillyLittleTodger

Harry’s blatant racism as an adult excused and of course it’s the Royal Family’s fault anyway 😂

I think what may bite the Sussexes on the bum, whether fairly or unfairly, is what knowledge they had of the York clan’s behaviour(s) between 2016 (when they met) and 2020 (when they left the UK but not the royal family) and in subsequent years when they maintained contact with Eugenie and possibly others.

Whatever emerges, this will be set against a backdrop of (a) their stated support for various causes, issues and political goals; (b) people, policies and practices that they have previously criticised.

As titled members of the royal family, there may well be a justifiable interest in their financial interests, connections and relationships. There will be an investigative appetite now to find examples of potential wrong-doing, hypocrisy and venality where such appetite may not have existed before. (They have become quite boring other than being titled royals.)

And I don’t think there’s much the Sussexes can do about it while they reman a titled branch of the royal family, with the prince H so close to the king and so high up the line of succession.

Yes. Harry was reflecting his environment and how he was brought up, and the values of his grandfather, and the same among his army mates, when he was being racist as a young man.

Once he was older and mingled with a wider variety of people from different races and married someone with a white father and black mother, he realised how wrong he had been, acknowledged it publically and apologised.

I don’t see the rest of the RF acknowledging their past mistakes?

Can you AI search for a deleted comment on Mumsnet?

It would be so easy for you to clarify your position. Why won’t you?