Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family
OP posts:
Thread gallery
54
ThePoshUns · 19/02/2026 13:15

ascenda · 19/02/2026 13:05

I thought police couldn't encroach Royal land without the King's permission. Is this true, and if so how did they arrest AMW on land owned by the King in Norfolk, or indeed Royal Lodge either?

Maybe I'm getting confused and there's something I'm missing or misinterpreting. Not hard with all the threads on this!

It wouldn’t surprise me if Charles was approached about it beforehand. Someone certainly tipped off the press.

ThePoshUns · 19/02/2026 13:17

I just hope he is in a general custody unit, with doors banging, the smell of feet, drinks shouting and swearing.

binkie163 · 19/02/2026 13:18

Ukisgaslit · 19/02/2026 12:39

Oh @binkie163
are you thinking that the contents of royal lodge are elsewhere ?
I hadn’t thought of that .

I still feel a lot of this is for show. What else do the Windsors know but superficiality and cover up ?

Edited

AMW is staying at one Sandringham property while they tart up the one he will be living at. It was sort of sold to us as the king had enough and decided enough brother you are out tonight, very handy timing. This was few weeks ago? Nowhere to put it all, so it's somewhere 🤷 and I would wager it has been gone through with a tooth comb by friendlies because if I was the king none of that shit would be seeing the light of day. Police searching 2 empty properties saying they will want to go through his phone and gadgets...I'm betting they have been wiped or destroyed. I can't help feeling this is for show.
What they should be searching are the sealed trade envoy files.

PumpkinPieAlibi · 19/02/2026 13:27

bluegreygreen · 19/02/2026 12:57

The only people who have said that this is anything to do with Republic is Republic, and even they have only said this is "likely influenced by Republic's pursuit of a private prosecution".

While that is true, it's a moot point either way. It doesn't matter if it's Republic or Joe Public who demanded this - the point I was trying to make was that it was NOT the RF who handed Andrew over.

Quite frankly, I am cynical enough to think this plays perfectly into the RF's hands. Andrew is arrested on, relatively speaking, the less offensive charges, it gives the impression that the RF are not above the law, it also forces the media to quiet speculation so as not to influence current ongoing legal proceedings and eventually, it all dies down and the RF can say 'see? we did what we were supposed to.'

It's obvious they knew of all this before the news came to light. William's hiring of a crisis manager was very likely in anticipation of this.

bluegreygreen · 19/02/2026 13:36

Andrew is arrested on, relatively speaking, the less offensive charges

Perhaps less offensive charges.

More importantly, charges that are more likely to result in a successful prosecution, given that they are more likely to come with solid evidence, and don't involve changes in statute over time (like the trafficking law).

Lalgarh · 19/02/2026 13:43

ThePoshUns · 19/02/2026 13:17

I just hope he is in a general custody unit, with doors banging, the smell of feet, drinks shouting and swearing.

Looking out for a future episode of 24 hours in police custody

PumpkinPieAlibi · 19/02/2026 13:44

bluegreygreen · 19/02/2026 13:36

Andrew is arrested on, relatively speaking, the less offensive charges

Perhaps less offensive charges.

More importantly, charges that are more likely to result in a successful prosecution, given that they are more likely to come with solid evidence, and don't involve changes in statute over time (like the trafficking law).

Again, I don't disagree with any of that. That is all true and I do hope, what with tangible evidence, that any prosecution is successful.

The point I continue to make is that all this is happening DESPITE the RF's best efforts, not BECAUSE of them.

CathyorClaire · 19/02/2026 14:11

Just seen this on the BBC world news which appears to be melting down

He's had months to prepare for this possibility.

I wonder if they'll manage to find anything relevant

BemusedAmerican · 19/02/2026 14:13

Search the teddy bears. 😁

RainbowBagels · 19/02/2026 14:25

simpsonthecat · 19/02/2026 13:04

Indeed

And the Andrew apologists have slunk away

Ironically I think its the Royalists and the apologists who will see the end of the RF. Because the only way they survive is by being forced to look at their own behaviour and completely reforming the number of people on the Royal payroll, their secrecy around their activities and finances and the lackeys and sycophants surrounding them. If they try and get away with saying 'nothing to do with us' and carrying on with business as usual, I think it will be the end of them.

binkie163 · 19/02/2026 14:44

Ukisgaslit · 19/02/2026 12:42

I have not read the thread but I am worried that the investigation will focus on Andrew’s trade envoy activities and not on sex trafficking and other rumoured perversions .
The latter is much worse in my opinion .

And will Andrew be focussed on while any other links between Epstein and the Windsors will be brushed under the carpet ?

Sky news saying Gordon brown has submitted new documents today to all police ref the trafficking and girls.

NoDrums · 19/02/2026 16:30

bluegreygreen · 19/02/2026 13:36

Andrew is arrested on, relatively speaking, the less offensive charges

Perhaps less offensive charges.

More importantly, charges that are more likely to result in a successful prosecution, given that they are more likely to come with solid evidence, and don't involve changes in statute over time (like the trafficking law).

Andrew had destroyed documents over Christmas. That was known. But given that he’s not the brightest, and documents would have been kept at the palace level, aside from the Epstein emails, I’m holding out hope that there’s plenty of evidence available.

Edit: meant to quote a diff. post

But agree with you, there will be a chain of evidence that does not rely on Andrew’s documents.

RainbowBagels · 19/02/2026 16:35

ThePoshUns · 19/02/2026 13:15

It wouldn’t surprise me if Charles was approached about it beforehand. Someone certainly tipped off the press.

Apparently he didnt know. The press have been camped out there since he moved, and its his birthday today. I suspect he was arrested on his birthday so the press couldcsee that hed been arrested. The police are on the hook for this too not only because of their previoys inaction but because of the hundreds of police and RPO's over the years it would have needed to turn a blind eye.

Puzzledandpissedoff · 19/02/2026 16:53

AreYouSureAskedNaomi · 19/02/2026 12:51

My expectation was that all the allegations would peter out with zero action from the RF or our overly deferential political class. The fact that the brother of the king can be arrested is huge in the UK.

Hopefully this will lead to a proper and transparent investigation. I remain cynical in that respect.

They could still easily peter out, but with this refusing to go away the RF had to do something and an arrest is in indeed significant no matter how choreographed it might have been

Trouble is, if sufficient evidence to charge and convict either can't be found, or has been destroyed or "lost", we'll be right back with Andrew insisting he's never been convicted of anything and expecting to go on appearing with the rest

Rhaidimiddim · 19/02/2026 17:00

RainbowBagels · 19/02/2026 16:35

Apparently he didnt know. The press have been camped out there since he moved, and its his birthday today. I suspect he was arrested on his birthday so the press couldcsee that hed been arrested. The police are on the hook for this too not only because of their previoys inaction but because of the hundreds of police and RPO's over the years it would have needed to turn a blind eye.

The fact that i dividual plods turned a blind eye could be a very big problem for the individual plods and thus for the prosecution.

The officers who bunked at Epstein's NY house while AWM was there ( or anywherevelse, for that matter). If they saw anything illegal going on - shouldn't they have reported it at the time?

TheAutumnCrow · 19/02/2026 17:19

Ukisgaslit · 19/02/2026 12:39

Oh @binkie163
are you thinking that the contents of royal lodge are elsewhere ?
I hadn’t thought of that .

I still feel a lot of this is for show. What else do the Windsors know but superficiality and cover up ?

Edited

I think it’s all in storage and the Police have access.

That what was in the ?Guardian earlier but I’ll try and check.

wordler · 19/02/2026 17:56

Rhaidimiddim · 19/02/2026 17:00

The fact that i dividual plods turned a blind eye could be a very big problem for the individual plods and thus for the prosecution.

The officers who bunked at Epstein's NY house while AWM was there ( or anywherevelse, for that matter). If they saw anything illegal going on - shouldn't they have reported it at the time?

i wonder if Epstein kept the worst of the activities connected to the very young girls hidden when they had UK police officers on site at his various properties because I can’t understand how they could have witnessed that and kept working for Andrew or not reported it, or not whistleblown to the press etc.

Was Andrew considered ‘safe’ once inside the property so the protection officers would go and sit in their rooms, close the door and pretend it wasn’t happening?

BasiliskStare · 19/02/2026 17:56

bluegreygreen · 19/02/2026 13:36

Andrew is arrested on, relatively speaking, the less offensive charges

Perhaps less offensive charges.

More importantly, charges that are more likely to result in a successful prosecution, given that they are more likely to come with solid evidence, and don't involve changes in statute over time (like the trafficking law).

I think Andrew is fighting on two fronts here

  1. Involvement in trafficking etc.
  2. Wrongdoing as a Trade Envoy

I think 1 is the more serious and repulsive , but that is no reason not to investigate him for 2 separately. If appropriate I would like him to be investigated for both, but investigating him for 2 doesn't preclude him being investigated for 1 as a different thing. I don't think the police are doing an either / or here at the moment.

ETA So as I think @bluegreygreen said - prosecute him for what there is evidence for because I think he could potentially be facing more than one charge in the fulness of time.

Serenster · 19/02/2026 18:02

No - the police can charge him with whatever offences they think they can prove at whatever stage they think fit. It’s not a “one and done” situation.

I also wouldn’t expect Andrew to be charged with anything tomorrow. Proper investigations take time and Thames Valley Police will not want to make a silly error that means their case falters. That would not be a sign that he won’t be charged in due course, though.

ascenda · 19/02/2026 18:09

wordler · 19/02/2026 17:56

i wonder if Epstein kept the worst of the activities connected to the very young girls hidden when they had UK police officers on site at his various properties because I can’t understand how they could have witnessed that and kept working for Andrew or not reported it, or not whistleblown to the press etc.

Was Andrew considered ‘safe’ once inside the property so the protection officers would go and sit in their rooms, close the door and pretend it wasn’t happening?

An awful thought crossed my mind. What if any of the POs had access to the same as Andrew and others, in order to keep them quiet. Joint guilt. I'm only speculating, but I can't be the first person to think this surely?

Daygloboo · 19/02/2026 18:10

wordler · 19/02/2026 17:56

i wonder if Epstein kept the worst of the activities connected to the very young girls hidden when they had UK police officers on site at his various properties because I can’t understand how they could have witnessed that and kept working for Andrew or not reported it, or not whistleblown to the press etc.

Was Andrew considered ‘safe’ once inside the property so the protection officers would go and sit in their rooms, close the door and pretend it wasn’t happening?

What power would an in dividual officer have against that machine. They'd just be dismissed if they tried to go up sgainst the RF. Who'd listen to them.

wordler · 19/02/2026 18:12

Daygloboo · 19/02/2026 18:10

What power would an in dividual officer have against that machine. They'd just be dismissed if they tried to go up sgainst the RF. Who'd listen to them.

What person would witness young girls being abused and not try to do something or ask to be reassigned?

I believe Andrew had a regular team who continued working with him over several years.

DancingFerret · 19/02/2026 18:12

I've wouldn't like to guess why Thames Valley Police decided to arrest AMW on his birthday, but if not for tactical reasons it can probably be assumed whoever authorised the arrest thought it would be an appropriate birthday present for him.

My2cents1975 · 19/02/2026 18:17

Given that Andrew is being accused of financial crimes, if the materials he sent included information on currency dealings in US dollars the US can potentially claim jurisdiction on the basis of the currency of the crime.

See the 2015 FIFA scandal where non-US citizens engaged in financial crimes outside US territory but since the bribe was in US dollars, the Department of Justice (DOJ) claimed jurisdiction and eventually took down several high-ranking FIFA individuals.

Andrew might find himself extradited and facing Pam Bondi's DOJ prosecution team. And they will quite happily rip Andrew to shreds...without breaking a sweat.

simpsonthecat · 19/02/2026 18:22

Rhaidimiddim · 19/02/2026 17:00

The fact that i dividual plods turned a blind eye could be a very big problem for the individual plods and thus for the prosecution.

The officers who bunked at Epstein's NY house while AWM was there ( or anywherevelse, for that matter). If they saw anything illegal going on - shouldn't they have reported it at the time?

I read in the past that they tried. When AMW stayed in NY, he was advised to stay at the Consulate. I read ages ago they took it further. But he refused and said he would stay where he wanted. And that he was only answerable to his mother.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.