Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family
OP posts:
Thread gallery
54
MidWayThruJanuary · 08/02/2026 18:02

@Zippedydodah
It would have been planned months ago, long before any of the Epstein stuff was released

Mylovelygreendress · 08/02/2026 18:06

MidWayThruJanuary · 08/02/2026 18:02

@Zippedydodah
It would have been planned months ago, long before any of the Epstein stuff was released

Edited

Exactly . Just because it was only announced a few weeks ago doesn’t mean it hasn’t been months of planning .

Rhaidimiddim · 08/02/2026 18:10

Ukisgaslit · 08/02/2026 17:57

@Rhaidimiddim

The more I think about the more I think the red boxes are a key issue

The red boxes continue to support the image that the Windsors are somehow ‘special’ and holding up the entire system of government . When truth is it benefits the Windsors not us.

Never mind the abuses Windsors have inflected on us as a result of their access to government papers .

If a signature / stamp is needed - it’s a civil service/ governmental issue , as other countries must do.
Or a Windsor can sign at the LAST stage - that would more apolitical and no first / second look and consent/ assent nonsense.

Edited

" sign at the LAST stage"

Or have a bloody good reason not to.

Ukisgaslit · 08/02/2026 18:10

Rhaidimiddim · 08/02/2026 17:46

This is a very interesting point. I wonder if other Constitutional monarchs get the same level of access to State information. And, if so, what the rationale is in those countries.

Do you want to take a wild guess about whether other ‘constitutional monarchies’ allow their monarchs red boxes ?

We don’t need to guess . Of course they don’t . It’s yet another unique Windsor ‘privilege’ - similar to the coronation we have imposed on us. European monarchs can’t do that either.
Coronations are also propaganda.

hoteltango · 08/02/2026 18:10

MidWayThruJanuary · 08/02/2026 18:02

@Zippedydodah
It would have been planned months ago, long before any of the Epstein stuff was released

Edited

That's right. From Valentine Low's book:

The programme of visits is decided by the Royal Visits Committee, which meets twice a year. It is chaired by the permanent undersecretary of the Foreign Office and includes the private secretaries from the royal households, the national security adviser, and representatives from Number 10, the Cabinet Office, and other government departments.

I don't think it's fair to describe William's visit as a "jolly" - though that word aptly describes Andrew's various trips abroad.

binkie163 · 08/02/2026 18:11

AlwaysRightISwear · 08/02/2026 15:18

But is it her family lying about Maxwells money or is it her saying it is Maxwell money when actually it is trafficking Epstein money? Ill-gotten gains either way of course but still murky.

The Times also state it is Maxwell trust fund but with this bunch of crooks its anyones guess!
No one at the time believed there was no money left, maxwell stole over £400 million. Phillip Green copied Maxwell to the tune of £571 million but he was force to pay back £363 million so still £200 million short.
It is obscene these people get away with it, destroying lives while still be able to carry on as millionaires.

Ukisgaslit · 08/02/2026 18:15

In fact in some important ways the UK is not a constitutional monarchy at all .
And references to other European constitutional monarchies is really a fig leaf hiding how we allow the Windsors to operate

The red boxes really need to stop
Why would the Windsors object ? They claim to be apolitical don’t they ?

BlueandWhitePorcelain · 08/02/2026 18:22

AnnunciataM · 08/02/2026 16:41

Lownie now saying Epstein may have been working for Moscow, this just gets worse and worse.
https://archive.ph/RqGN5

We’ve always believed Mossad funded Epstein and by extension GM, to gather incriminating evidence on the elite in the West, to blackmail them into continuing their support for Israel, and we still do.

RainbowBagels · 08/02/2026 19:44

MidWayThruJanuary · 08/02/2026 17:42

William off on a jolly to Saudi Arabia tomorrow - that bastion of free speech and women’s rights.

They love the Saudi Royals. All that cash, all that unlimited power...

keepeofthesevenkeys · 08/02/2026 19:46

BlueandWhitePorcelain · 08/02/2026 18:22

We’ve always believed Mossad funded Epstein and by extension GM, to gather incriminating evidence on the elite in the West, to blackmail them into continuing their support for Israel, and we still do.

We? Do you have any evidence for this?

TheAutumnCrow · 08/02/2026 19:53

MidWayThruJanuary · 08/02/2026 17:42

William off on a jolly to Saudi Arabia tomorrow - that bastion of free speech and women’s rights.

And a state visit from the president of Nigeria coming up.

TheAutumnCrow · 08/02/2026 20:00

hoteltango · 08/02/2026 18:10

That's right. From Valentine Low's book:

The programme of visits is decided by the Royal Visits Committee, which meets twice a year. It is chaired by the permanent undersecretary of the Foreign Office and includes the private secretaries from the royal households, the national security adviser, and representatives from Number 10, the Cabinet Office, and other government departments.

I don't think it's fair to describe William's visit as a "jolly" - though that word aptly describes Andrew's various trips abroad.

Could the royal family veto or amend a government request around a royal visit, like it can interfere with statues via the wicker and red boxes, I wonder.

mathanxiety · 08/02/2026 20:14

Ukisgaslit · 08/02/2026 10:51

@simpsonthecat

Why would Starmer need Charles’s permission ?

Is this a democracy or not?
Its not if a pm needs to ‘ask permission’.

The Windsors do as they please - democracy and accountability is for little people

Because of the constitutional position of the monarchy vision a vis parliament, as set forth in the 1688 Act of Settlement.

The PM is 'his majesty's prime minister'. The political remit of the sovereign was completely curtailed by the Act, but the assertion that parliament's authority came from the sovereign was a convenient way to avoid future civil wars over succession or the balance of power between parliament and sovereign. These were hot button issues throughout the 17th century, under the Stuarts.

Over the centuries, parliament has become even more entrenched and its powers have become more and more real and tangible while the monarchy's role has become more and more ephemeral and symbolic. Nevertheless, the polite fiction of the sovereign as the source of parliament's authority remains.

Now that AMW is no longer a prince and just a relative of the monarch, existing in a sort of limbo, the PM has decided (presumably on the advice of constitutional lawyers) that he can make public statements about how he thinks AMW should conduct himself. This would not have been considered possible before AMW was stripped of his titles - he would have to have got the nod from KCIII before making a statement.

He actually could have pushed the envelope, but that is not how things are done. The niceties have to be observed. It may well be that he had some sort of nod from KCIII to make the statement he made.Stuart's.

And no, the UK is not technically a democracy. It is a constitutional monarchy.

Ukisgaslit · 08/02/2026 20:50

@mathanxiety

I was referring to the idea that the Windsors are apolitical . They are not.

’Constitional monarchy ‘ is a wide term

The UK allows much more overreach by the monarch than other European countries do. The red boxes for example.
Other European constitutional monarchies do not allow this sort of interference.
The whole red box system only benefits the Windsors as it helps to create the impression that they are somehow ‘holding up’ our system . It is unnecessary and can and should be stopped .

ChrisMartinsKisskam · 08/02/2026 20:55

CathyorClaire · 08/02/2026 11:02

Thanks for new thread AnnunciataM.

I've just been catching up on the last thread. So much absolutely shocking stuff coming to light now and worth bearing in mind we're only hearing it from a document dump from the US while our royals with all their spokespeople still have nothing to say

Were the protection officers wearing blinkers when they stayed in Epstein's house?
Did they report back?
Were they told not to report back?

A poster on the other thread mentioned Maxwell and Cressida Dick being at the same school. Google indicates they would been at Balliol, Oxford at the same time which is a very interesting coincidence.

That was me - I can’t remember exactly where I read it it was a few years ago

CathyorClaire · 08/02/2026 20:56

I'd never heard of TerraMar until today, but it does make me wonder if there's any truth in some reports that the Sussexes' charity, Archwell (sp?) exists as a means of churning.

I was aware of TerraMar but had forgotten it.

I do think there are financial questions to answer in very many royal charities and initiatives C3's, H's and now after WildAid, W's too.

I hope the MW spotlight swings on the lot of them.

SomeoneCalled · 08/02/2026 21:04

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

ChrisMartinsKisskam · 08/02/2026 21:07

I think that eventually the palace will blame the Queen 😂
no one could override her decisions

Andrew was well known to be her favourite

she paid £12 million to protect her favourite son

shes dead so can’t refute anything 😂

CathyorClaire · 08/02/2026 21:11

Just as a matter of interest, how many posters in this forum would want all their e-mails going back twenty years or more making public? I know I wouldn’t, even if it’s just indiscretions or moans about friends or family members.

I can't imagine anyone might be interested in my shopping history or co-ordinating visits with bro.

What's in yours?!

TheAutumnCrow · 08/02/2026 21:13

ChrisMartinsKisskam · 08/02/2026 21:07

I think that eventually the palace will blame the Queen 😂
no one could override her decisions

Andrew was well known to be her favourite

she paid £12 million to protect her favourite son

shes dead so can’t refute anything 😂

The late Queen as the fall guy?

Maybe Andrew could hint that he works for MI6? ‘Spy Family York: The International Years’.

CathyorClaire · 08/02/2026 21:22

I’m sure Amanda Thirsk would be able to provide quite an insight into a lot of AMW’s exploits if and when she is asked to.

Her name comes up time and time again.

How she's escaped detailed examination is beyond me.

CathyorClaire · 08/02/2026 21:29

MidWayThruJanuary · 08/02/2026 17:42

William off on a jolly to Saudi Arabia tomorrow - that bastion of free speech and women’s rights.

Don't worry.

Half term next week.

Time to recover from the nasty awfulness with another hands-on Daddy jaunt

CathyorClaire · 08/02/2026 21:41

I think that eventually the palace will blame the Queen

I wonder how they'll square that with the proposed £46m statue we're apparently coughing for?

Guerlainade · 08/02/2026 21:45

The government needs to step up & see that Andrew gets fully investigated & taken to court.
No ifs & buts, as he's an ordinary citizen now.

I was an ardent royal family supporter but now I'm becoming to think we need to get rid of the monarchy. It's a gilded cage which can allow monsters to flourish in plain sight.
It's also cruel to the people born it, as The Crown matters more than the individual & makes Dynasty/Dallas etc look like Playschool/In The Night Garden.

After KC3 passes it should stop. Maybe to pacify the masses William (or Kate) could be offered first dibs as ceremonial head of state President (like they do in Ireland & other countries) but as Mr William Wales & the tenure should be no longer than 10yrs then a new president elected.

If it works in other countries where the Prime Minister is the person in charge & the President just the ceremonial figurehead then it should work here too.

TheAutumnCrow · 08/02/2026 21:51

CathyorClaire · 08/02/2026 21:41

I think that eventually the palace will blame the Queen

I wonder how they'll square that with the proposed £46m statue we're apparently coughing for?

It’s now including the money for ‘replacement of the bridge’, conveniently.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.