The Sussex Family Christmas Card

[GreyPlayer]

Shared by Meghan on Instagram.

Meghan Shares the Sweetest Christmas Photo with Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet

In what way ?

She probably thinks she thinks she is, but Royals and celebs seem to have a skewed view on things because they don’t live in the world as the rest of us do. They’re all clueless and removed from so much of it.

Well he’s cautious - we don’t see their faces.

Btw, what is this screenshot of? Who published this in its original form?

No. It’s a definite no.

And a GBNews ‘journalist’ just had to apologise on air for saying this very thing.

With that I’m done with this thread. It’s become very nasty.

Yes of course, this is exactly what he meant - there’s no problem posting photos of children online as long as you do it cautiously. All those issues and dangers, the risk the photos could be harvested and manipulated by rogue AI - easily defeated as long as you don’t click on that post button too boldly. If there’s one thing that AI respects, it’s a parent exploiting their children cautiously 🤦‍♀️

Loads of them out there.

https://www.hellomagazine.com/royalty/864523/prince-harry-difficult-conversations-meghan-children-social-media/?viewas=amp

You think I made it up?

These hidden faces pics are just naff. There’s zero need for them. They created an issue for themselves by making a big deal about wanting their children to have this private childhood buy also being desperate to show them/use them for their ‘brand’.
And the whole floral dress/long socks is clearly a very RF way to dress your children, look at how Charlotte was dressed for a long time. It’s a nod to that. I hated long socks growing up, I can’t imagine it’s a choice.

Either do the face reveal or don’t, but what is with this back-of-head nonsense?

The photo looks so contrived with them both posing with one child each, making sure that the faces are angled away from shot.

But more importantly, H’s preaching about keeping children of social media, and yet his are not being flogged on IG.

There are celebs who simply don’t post their kids. This is what influencers do.

Just👏don’t👏post👏

“So many parents don’t have that awareness”. Omg he’s so condescending.

He’s not wrong though. Lots of parents are clueless about what their kids are doing online, how certain apps work, they can’t even recognise potentially dodgy, perverted posters on here for example, yet they’re responsible for keeping their children safe online. It’s frightening.

I reckon probably the only children in the UK who can safely have their images out there are actually the Wales children. Starmer has gone the other way and been able to enforce no public images ever anywhere of his children, otherwise I think his children might fall into this bracket too for as long as he’s in office. These two families are of such importance to the nation that legacy and new media organizations can be leaned on to do as they’re told wrt images of these children and anyone caught transgressing would feel the full force of the law. Ironically, had Harry and Meghan not flounced off saying it makes them good parents for not wanting a press pen of 40 at every school drop off (in her dreams 🙄) their children would have had this protection too. Instead they’re having to indulge in this stupid back of their head rubbish and continuously sue for securidee. Literally nobody is interested in the back of a person’s head. I don’t know why they insist on doing it. What is it for? Everyone knows they have children. Why do they insist on putting images of the backs of their heads out there?

I agree @canklesmctacotits👏

Harry and Meghan's children do have a certain amount of protection as the Celebrity Children's Act passed in 2013 (SB 606)

It was passed at the urging of celebrities like Halle Berry and Jennifer Garner - it strengthened anti-paparazzi laws by increasing penalties for harassing children under 16, making it a misdemeanor to intentionally alarm, annoy, torment, or terrorize them due to their parents' public status, adding jail time (up to a year) and fines (up to $10,000), and allowing parents to sue for damages and profits, protecting kids from becoming tabloid fodder.

The law aimed to stop paparazzi from pursuing celebrity children aggressively in public, treating them as "tabloid fodder," and giving families greater protection in their daily lives, like going to school.

Under the law Harassment includes actions taken while attempting to record a child's image or voice without consent, such as: Following the child or parent. Lying in wait. Or other conduct that seriously alarms, annoys, torments, or terrorizes the child.

It also introduced the requirement for parental consent for publications to use pictures of celebrity children. So when you see paps taking pictures of celebrity kids - such as Archie a Lilibet photographed trick-or-treating at Halloween you know that Harry and/or Meghan has consented.

Any time the children are pictured in a US publication (print? Online?) Harry and/or Meghan will have consented? That’s sordid, grubby, hypocritical behaviour. What are these two doing?? Why are they involving their children at all? Preaching about the harms of social media, suing for taxpayer funded armed police protection, putting the children’s body parts on their own Insta, allowing tabloids to print photos of their kids because, what, it promotes a specific image ? What tacky, grubby, gutter behaviour from unserious and inconsequential people. It could have been so different, but they gave it all up…for this?! Smh.

To generate interest in them and get people guessing what they look like. Which is incredibly exploitative.

What is sad is how far Harry seems willing to compromise himself to keep Meghan happy. I don’t believe he would have done this, left to his own devices. He says he fears for his own children’s safety and yet he lets her do this stuff.

Their fans have been generating tons of AI images of the kids based on all the photos H&M are releasing of their kids.

It's easy enough to generate 'age progression' images based on earlier photos, police do it all the time for missing children, now with AI it is even more realistic.

They are just the most two faced couple in public life at the moment, if that divorce ever happens, it will be carnage.

There’s something strange going on, for sure. Either he’s not really all that bothered about security after all, or his wife is happy to completely ignore what seems to be a very deep-seated worry for Harry and just crack on posting completely unnecessary pictures of their children on line. I’ve said before it’s almost like she’s trolling him - he makes a speech or whatever about how children should be kept out of the public eye and she just whacks a pic up there for the whole world to see.

I wonder what it’s like in their house, day to day.

Not letting you flounce off and get away with this attempt at disinformation. You can see clearly from the link you provided that THE NEW HOME of The Parents Network is redirecting from AF to Parents Together https://archewell.org/theparentsnetwork/

Funnily enough I just saw one - they seem to have abducted Prince William when he was young 😂🤷‍♀️

LOL, that’s too funny!1 they really want that association with William, don’t they!

Hilarious!

That dress megs is wearing is completely see through! What a bizarre choice of outfit and pose to wear for a family photo. And no pants! Seriously? In white see through frock? Who is megs trying to impress? Persil?

Very deliberate and no doubt many takes to get the pose wanted. Not impressed her dd is being used to pose mum.

There are some very disturbing elements to that picture, not the least of which is whose very blond children’s faces were being used to represent A and L.