Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family
Thread gallery
24
AtIusvue · 07/11/2025 15:25

jeffgoldblum · 07/11/2025 14:49

This can’t be true surely?
it would be very foolish if it is!

She has no chance.

The titles are easy to remove and William will be quick to remove them.

OP posts:
Wellthatsacharlingknot · 07/11/2025 15:26

BigWillyLittleTodger · 07/11/2025 15:05

My question is, what has rattled these fans?

🙋🏻‍♀️ I know I know! what’s rattled the faux republican super fans on here to the point of hysteria is the one and only Andrew! Not what he has done, but the fact he has been stripped of all titles and booted out his house all on the say so of the Monarch, no need to go through Parliament and once William becomes King they all know it’s game over, William forever more will have the power over Harry, Meghan and their children and they can’t stand it, all the born Prince nonsense and claims of it’s their birthright has been blown out the water, plus now Andrew has been dealt with they can’t use the but but Andrew card, desperate times are calling for desperate measures hence the trying and failing miserably to shut posters down.

Speaking of hysteria 😂

William was always going to have power over Harry being heir and then eventually monarch. Everyone knows that. It’s always been the case, no matter Andrew’s antics. No matter what title Harry does or does not retain, William can’t deny their fraternal relationship.

And William voluntarily mentioned Harry’s name quite amiably in his recent Apple interview BigWillyLittleTodger but I bow to your superior knowledge of what goes on in William’s mind as you obviously have a clearer idea than he does!

Personally, I think it’s equally likely that William, who dislikes press intrusion and controversy, can see the value in having a non-controversial relationship with his brother, so the press can’t continue to set the brothers against one another. It’s equally likely he will opt for some sort of aimable settlement of their issues given time. Or he would be wise to do so.

But let’s be honest, neither of us know for sure what is going to happen in future. You are just guessing BigWillyLittleTodger and so am I!

As for the question of shutting posters down; republicans have been facing that issue for years. Funny how posters are only now protesting about it now, when the shoe is on the other foot.

bubzie · 07/11/2025 15:26

AtIusvue · 07/11/2025 14:45

My question is, what has rattled these fans?

Its clear As ever sales ain’t great, but they never were. It was all smoke and
mirrors. A million jars ordered aeh Meg?
Highlighting that the Godmothers inventory stock were in single digits for some items and there was one sale of what I had seen over a couple of hours…...sent them off into the stratosphere. It is, what it is….why get upset about it.

The cameo role, while it stinks of desperation and money problems, I suspect will be an easy pay day for Megs. She has bills to pay and Harry ain’t paying them.

Edited

It's a slow fade with Meghan and Harry .....project after another, showing up here and there, nothing really sticking and meanwhile things move on in the UK. Charles is taking more of a back seat and William is successfully carrying on on the wider world stage. The years are passing - tick tock!

jumpingthehighjump · 07/11/2025 15:26

BigWillyLittleTodger · 07/11/2025 15:05

My question is, what has rattled these fans?

🙋🏻‍♀️ I know I know! what’s rattled the faux republican super fans on here to the point of hysteria is the one and only Andrew! Not what he has done, but the fact he has been stripped of all titles and booted out his house all on the say so of the Monarch, no need to go through Parliament and once William becomes King they all know it’s game over, William forever more will have the power over Harry, Meghan and their children and they can’t stand it, all the born Prince nonsense and claims of it’s their birthright has been blown out the water, plus now Andrew has been dealt with they can’t use the but but Andrew card, desperate times are calling for desperate measures hence the trying and failing miserably to shut posters down.

Goodness, you could not be more wrong
I, for one, am delighted that Andrew has been dealt with. It has taken long enough and I fear/feel it is because there is a lot more to come out. When, not if, the Epstein files are released I think there will be so much more to come to light and this action of stripping him of everything is so no one can say anything when more shit hits the fan.

There is nothing harry and Meghan have done that is even remotely akin to the Yorks. There are many people, historians and such like who are on record saying that this York debacle is the biggest crisis to hit the Monarchy since the Duke of Windsor. It has been called the single greatest threat to the Monarchy, no pair of royals in modern times have caused more sustained reputational damage to the monarchy than the Duke and Duchess of York.

I think Royalists are completely rattled because this has shown such weakness over decades from QE2 and only now has action been taken. If William wants to take some sort of action against Harry & Meghan, so be it, they will survive as they are not beholden to handouts from the King.

To add, I will bring up Andrew when it is appropriate for the reasons above - the damage he has done.

I am also politely asking the OP to not post saying I am derailing by mentioning Andrew. I am answering the poster I quoted which is only fair.

I am not trying to shut anyone down, I have found this thread an eye opener and hope to catch Meghan's cameo!

BigWillyLittleTodger · 07/11/2025 15:28

AtIusvue · 07/11/2025 15:25

She has no chance.

The titles are easy to remove and William will be quick to remove them.

Plus she may have been able to get away with bullying her staff on both sides of the Atlantic, she can’t bully William he holds every bit of power over her.

bubzie · 07/11/2025 15:29

Petitchat · 07/11/2025 15:19

Admit it, there's no shame in liking her....

Keyboard Axolotl GIF

.

Spectre8 · 07/11/2025 15:35

AtIusvue · 07/11/2025 15:21

Don’t pretend not to understand the subject matter. I stated you never started threads. You are on a Meg thread, obviously we are talking about that subject and not another. why on earth would I be talking about you starting a thread on a completely different topic?

You were very upset at the Meg threads and constantly try to police them, so I’ve told you to start your own. Which you haven’t done. Because you don’t start threads- you just jump on and derail.

You could have started a Christmas thread for all I know- but we weren’t talking about that. We were talking about the Meg threads.

Stop acting.

Edited

Again you should of been specific 🙄 and clear but you weren't and so what you stated is a lie. Its not for me or anyone else to read inbetween the lines and say oh she meant this or that. Unlike you I don't make assumptions or.

Upset? You don't know me you can't state for a fact I was upset. You can only assume I was and if I tell you I wasn't you choose to not believe me because you want your narrative about me out there as a fact. Seems to be a running theme here where you state assumptions as facts...Im upset...Stop acting....

I am never upset over threads or comments on here, nor am I acting.

bubzie · 07/11/2025 15:39

Should HAVE !

chunkyBoo · 07/11/2025 15:42

Petitchat · 07/11/2025 15:09

The poster doth protest too much, methinks...

Admit it, you like and admire them 😁

Edited

You just like pushing buttons, you should change your name to petty-provocateur

BigWillyLittleTodger · 07/11/2025 15:44

Goodness, you could not be more wrong I think I’m on the money actually.

There is nothing harry and Meghan have done that is even remotely akin to the Yorks. There are many people, historians and such like who are on record saying that this York debacle is the biggest crisis to hit the Monarchy since the Duke of Windsor. It has been called the single greatest threat to the Monarchy, no pair of royals in modern times have caused more sustained reputational damage to the monarchy than the Duke and Duchess of York.

At this point what they have or haven’t done is irrelevant, William is going to streamline the monarchy, there won’t be random Prince and Princesses using royal titles for their own gain, as a so called republican I presume you will support this when it happens.

I think Royalists are completely rattled because this has shown such weakness over decades from QE2 I was always annoyed that TLQ didn’t deal with the dross in her family effectively, it doesn’t bother me if it slightest if the striping of titles has “shown weakness” from TLQ, we’ve all moaned about it on here for years, it’s hardly a revelation.

I am not trying to shut anyone down then quit with the why do you cares in your posts and your faux bafflement and why anyone could possibly be interested it what Meghan does.

Mylovelygreendress · 07/11/2025 15:45

AtIusvue · 07/11/2025 14:45

My question is, what has rattled these fans?

Its clear As ever sales ain’t great, but they never were. It was all smoke and
mirrors. A million jars ordered aeh Meg?
Highlighting that the Godmothers inventory stock were in single digits for some items and there was one sale of what I had seen over a couple of hours…...sent them off into the stratosphere. It is, what it is….why get upset about it.

The cameo role, while it stinks of desperation and money problems, I suspect will be an easy pay day for Megs. She has bills to pay and Harry ain’t paying them.

Edited

I read on X ( so must be true!) that Meghan is only receiving expenses and the cameo is blink and you miss it . Also that the filmmaker/ producer wants her credited as Meghan Markle but M is insisting on Meghan , Duchess of Sussex .

AtIusvue · 07/11/2025 15:46

Spectre8 · 07/11/2025 15:35

Again you should of been specific 🙄 and clear but you weren't and so what you stated is a lie. Its not for me or anyone else to read inbetween the lines and say oh she meant this or that. Unlike you I don't make assumptions or.

Upset? You don't know me you can't state for a fact I was upset. You can only assume I was and if I tell you I wasn't you choose to not believe me because you want your narrative about me out there as a fact. Seems to be a running theme here where you state assumptions as facts...Im upset...Stop acting....

I am never upset over threads or comments on here, nor am I acting.

That’s not how the English language works. When you are on a fixed topic, there’s no need to highlight constantly, the exact subject matter. If you start talking about a subject, unless specifically stated otherwise, then you remain on that topic.

Don’t act the fool and pretend you don’t understand. You got caught! Having said that I’m the liar. What a joke..

You didn’t start a thread: end of. You have never started a thread. Understand what that means. Stop pretending.

Go and start a thread elsewhere and stop patrolling and looking for arguments. It’s attention seeking.

OP posts:
Indianrollerbird · 07/11/2025 15:47

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

AtIusvue · 07/11/2025 15:48

Mylovelygreendress · 07/11/2025 15:45

I read on X ( so must be true!) that Meghan is only receiving expenses and the cameo is blink and you miss it . Also that the filmmaker/ producer wants her credited as Meghan Markle but M is insisting on Meghan , Duchess of Sussex .

I seen that too- that it could be connected to her getting her title on the credits….so that she isn’t using it ‘commercially’, because she isn’t paid.

OP posts:
jumpingthehighjump · 07/11/2025 15:51

William is going to streamline the monarchy, there won’t be random Prince and Princesses using royal titles for their own gain, as a so called republican I presume you will support this when it happens
Interesting you know exactly what William is going to do when he is king.
In answer to your question absolutely fine by me. Totally support that if it gets rid of some of the wider family and their titles, go for it William!

then quit with the why do you cares in your posts and your faux bafflement and why anyone could possibly be interested it what Meghan does.

I will post what I like all within talk guidelines of course. I know 1000% without doubt some posters are incredibly interested in every tiny thing Meghan does, that's obvious! It's the level of detail that has surprised me! Not faux bafflement.....bafflement!

jeffgoldblum · 07/11/2025 15:52

Without wishing to sound like I’m telling people what to do ….
it would be much better to simply ignore the arguments and derailment.
this thread will be filled up before any relevant or actual discussion takes place.

Indianrollerbird · 07/11/2025 15:55

jumpingthehighjump · 07/11/2025 15:51

William is going to streamline the monarchy, there won’t be random Prince and Princesses using royal titles for their own gain, as a so called republican I presume you will support this when it happens
Interesting you know exactly what William is going to do when he is king.
In answer to your question absolutely fine by me. Totally support that if it gets rid of some of the wider family and their titles, go for it William!

then quit with the why do you cares in your posts and your faux bafflement and why anyone could possibly be interested it what Meghan does.

I will post what I like all within talk guidelines of course. I know 1000% without doubt some posters are incredibly interested in every tiny thing Meghan does, that's obvious! It's the level of detail that has surprised me! Not faux bafflement.....bafflement!

Edited

Well given your deep interest in Andrew Windsor, and the amount of time you have spent reading about him and posting about him, you must be in love with him, going by the logic of Petitchat. Yuk!

jumpingthehighjump · 07/11/2025 15:57

Maybe read my posts on the subject of Andrew. All will be clear if you do! 👍🙂

BigWillyLittleTodger · 07/11/2025 15:58

Interesting you know exactly what William is going to do when he is king.
In answer to your question absolutely fine by me. Totally support that if it gets rid of some of the wider family and their titles, go for it William!
Glad we will both be rejoicing when the titles go, at last something we agree on.

I will post what I like all within talk guidelines of course. I know 1000% without doubt some posters are incredibly interested in every tiny thing Meghan does, that's obvious! It's the level of detail that has surprised me! Not faux bafflement.....bafflement! As will I despite your robust attempts to shut posters down. How can you be baffled? You have been on here for years this can’t be news to you.

Indianrollerbird · 07/11/2025 15:58

jumpingthehighjump · 07/11/2025 15:57

Maybe read my posts on the subject of Andrew. All will be clear if you do! 👍🙂

Back at you with our posts about Meghan that seem to baffle you so much.

AtIusvue · 07/11/2025 15:59

I’m a predicting a spate of cameos before she returns to acting more seriously.

She can’t make any money selling the white label crap: the overheads must be huge for all the staff she has.

I cannot see anyway that they can continue this lifestyle, unless she pulls a Fergie and starts begging those around her for money.

OP posts:
jumpingthehighjump · 07/11/2025 15:59

BigWillyLittleTodger · 07/11/2025 15:58

Interesting you know exactly what William is going to do when he is king.
In answer to your question absolutely fine by me. Totally support that if it gets rid of some of the wider family and their titles, go for it William!
Glad we will both be rejoicing when the titles go, at last something we agree on.

I will post what I like all within talk guidelines of course. I know 1000% without doubt some posters are incredibly interested in every tiny thing Meghan does, that's obvious! It's the level of detail that has surprised me! Not faux bafflement.....bafflement! As will I despite your robust attempts to shut posters down. How can you be baffled? You have been on here for years this can’t be news to you.

To repeat again, I am not shutting anyone down, and I am allowed to be baffled however long I've been here

Viviennemary · 07/11/2025 16:04

Indianrollerbird · 07/11/2025 10:48

And us talking about it doesn't affect you and you can choose to ignore it. And yet here you are, once again.

You can ignore it all too if you like. But here you are choosing not to.

Viviennemary · 07/11/2025 16:05

jumpingthehighjump · 07/11/2025 15:57

Maybe read my posts on the subject of Andrew. All will be clear if you do! 👍🙂

Not in the least bit interested in your posts about Andrew. This is a Meghan thread.

Indianrollerbird · 07/11/2025 16:07

Viviennemary · 07/11/2025 16:04

You can ignore it all too if you like. But here you are choosing not to.

You are of course correct. We should all ignore the derailers and the perennially baffled with their pointless, goady posts.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.