Why is Meghan hated?

[YourBrickTiger]

I have very strong views about the Royals especially Camilla, however I am genuinely interested and want to find out more as to why Meghan Markle seems to be so hated. I'm asking in case there is something I have missed. I do read up as much as I can and watch shows from 'both sides' of the argument, but there is nothing that I have seen so far that warrants the level of sheer hatred geared towards her - I don't mean on here necessarily, but on social media in general. She cannot do ANYTHING without a swarm of people descending on her like vampires to tear her apart.

She isn't an adulteress, she's not a paedophile or sex offender, she isn't lazy, she seems to genuinely care about people in need.....and from what has been shown, she genuinely loves Harry and is just trying to make a life with him. He left the UK to start a life away from a nest of some awful people, his mother died when he was 12, his uncle is a sex offender, there is racism and a rigid set of rules within that family where he won't be king anyway so what is wrong with him leaving?

I'm not starting this to start an argument I am genuninely interested in why she is so rabidly disliked and why? Maybe I will start to feel differently if there is more of a reason but at the moment I cannot see one?

I think the UK.public want a constitutional monarchy that turns up, shows an interest in the people they meet, and is directed by the elected government.

Host Trump or Ceausescu? Yes, if the government of the day tell them to.

There is very much a limit to the opinions any if them should express in public.

Thinking of the spouses of other powerful men like the PM, do you see their wives spouting off in public giving their own opinions? No, they are there to support their husbands (or wives). Dennis Thatcher didn’t say a word on his own views. That’s the way it works.

In my opinion, I don't think that we need managers or bosses at all.

In my last job, when our manager went on holiday for two weeks, my team worked better than we ever did.

As we were not so stressed.

In my current job, my manager adds nothing of value, she just complicates everything. A lot of managers abuse their position and bully people "under" them.

I know so many people who have left a job because of the terrible manager.

That is because a hierarchal structure goes against normality.

The only time that i had a manager that really worked well , was because that particular manager saw himself as equal to everyone else. He didnt see himself as higher. That workplace was great, we all worked really well.

Anytime that i have worked under a hierarchal manager who thinks they are higher than everyone else, it never works well

So is the Princess of Wales not a royal personage in her own right? Just the wife of a powerful man?

Michelle Obama said a lot!

Yes, this.
It’s a supporting role, not the starring role.

It could well be a different dynamic and a role reversal in private.

That’s true but being First Lady is quite an active role and she was a lawyer as was her husband.

I have no wish to argue over work rotas with my colleagues. It would be incredibly stressful, because some would be very self centred. Others would be very co-operative and want to achieve consensus, but ultimately with no decision maker the selfish people would dominate.

Who ensures H&S? Equal rights? When no-one has the authority to.make a decision, even a decision to comply with the law.

Who.is held accountable for any failures in delivery?

It's not about being 'higher'. It's about responsibility and accountability.

Yes, but all too often, managers start to see themselves as higher and better than those working under them, and they abuse the people working under them.

We have all heard about terrible managers.

I dont work in our finance department.

The manager in my finance department is a notorious bully. She bullys everyone that works under her. One of the women that worked under her had a mental breakdown. Another one went off on stress leave.

Princess of Wales is a similiarly active role really

What are you doing about it then? Why aren't you asking for a "black" person to take your job for the good of society?

Do you have a "black" spouse?

Do other ethnic minorities get any of your sympathy, to just "black" people? Or are you lumping us all together as "black"? Is that the term your work training told you to use?

Have you travelled around the world as a person of colour? If you had, you would know that the UK is a comparative cake walk. Especially compared to the US.

No, you just wrote a pile of deranged drivel.

Its very strange that you are angry at me. S

If you had ASKED me I would have told you.

After we had anti racism training and diversity training. I DID raise issues to managers About what i see as racism in our workplace. They did listen to me and they implemented some changes.

Given that we've just had the longest reigning female monarch, who was also very popular, I don't think that's entirely accurate.

Did that include replacing yourself? You are part of the problem, yes? Employed at the expense of a "black" person.

Can you answer the rest of my post?

I like her and hope they come back to the UK and take up their royal duties.

Michelle Obama only spoke within the parameters she was permitted: soft subjects deemed suitable for her role as womanly support person.

I don't really understand why the non-elected spouse should have a voice/platform. We don't give the spouses of PMs that sort of platform, so why do the spouses of elected presidents get them? The US is supposed to have 3 equal branches of government, but I don't see the spouses of the heads of Congress and the Senate having a platform, let alone a faux castle to live in. The US presidency increasingly looks like electoral king making to me, complete with "queenly" spouse, and expectations of generational succession.

In reality, all the roles apart from the Monarch are support roles.

With an older monarch, the next in line gets to contribute a bit more and I'm sure gets more of a say behind the scenes for issues which will potentially affect their own role. But the head of state is the job, and the monarch is the one to decide the level of involvement of every other member of the team.

Tom Bowyers book.

Is that unusual where you are? I can walk into nearly every store in my local town and will only see white staff not through racism but because 99% of people that live in the town are white.
Some people just love to scream racism without seeing facts because it makes them feel superior. We had OFSTED in our pre school setting, in their report we were absolutely slated because we only had white children in our setting, they refused to acknowledge that we were on a military establishment and the pre school was for military personnel's children and none of the airmen/women posted there that had children were black. What the hell we were supposed to do i don't know and neither did they but slated us anyway.

Last census showed 82% of the UK population identified as white. So there will be predominantly white areas. But where the systemic racism comes into play is that non-white workers are paid less and hired less to managerial roles than white workers. So it's important to not just think in terms of numbers but in terms of equality across the whole working spectrum.

🤣🤣🤣

That is very funny!

“Royal duties”

What the hell would they be? 😂