Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Why is Meghan hated?

1000 replies

YourBrickTiger · 07/10/2025 13:26

I have very strong views about the Royals especially Camilla, however I am genuinely interested and want to find out more as to why Meghan Markle seems to be so hated. I'm asking in case there is something I have missed. I do read up as much as I can and watch shows from 'both sides' of the argument, but there is nothing that I have seen so far that warrants the level of sheer hatred geared towards her - I don't mean on here necessarily, but on social media in general. She cannot do ANYTHING without a swarm of people descending on her like vampires to tear her apart.

She isn't an adulteress, she's not a paedophile or sex offender, she isn't lazy, she seems to genuinely care about people in need.....and from what has been shown, she genuinely loves Harry and is just trying to make a life with him. He left the UK to start a life away from a nest of some awful people, his mother died when he was 12, his uncle is a sex offender, there is racism and a rigid set of rules within that family where he won't be king anyway so what is wrong with him leaving?

I'm not starting this to start an argument I am genuninely interested in why she is so rabidly disliked and why? Maybe I will start to feel differently if there is more of a reason but at the moment I cannot see one?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
19
ozarina · 16/10/2025 18:19

jonthebatiste · 16/10/2025 17:20

Wtf?

This thread has descended into some sort of weird parallel universe. Sex offender apologists left and right.

There was a civil court case which ended in a pay out. He wasn't convicted was he ? I dislike Andrew as much as anyone but I don't like lies.

ozarina · 16/10/2025 18:23

jumpingthehighjump · 16/10/2025 15:50

Yes it is. A civil case but a judge found him guilty of sexual abuse of E Jean Carroll and thereafter defamation. A jury verdict in 2023 found Trump liable for sexually abusing and defaming her.
Just because it is a civil case doesn't mean it isn't true

I thought the post was made about Andrew.

ozarina · 16/10/2025 18:24

Kimura · 16/10/2025 14:32

I don't 'consider' him a sex pest. He has been found liable for sexual abuse by a court of law. It is a fact.

Sorry - wrong person .

Mylovelygreendress · 16/10/2025 18:31

CurlewKate · 16/10/2025 17:37

This thread is…something else. No wonder Andrew is still appearing in public with no apparent shame when so many people seem to be prepared to defend him…..

Who is defending him ???

Cloud9isnowclosed · 16/10/2025 20:35

There seem to be some crossed wires on this thread. Posts referring to Trump and proven sexual misconduct, including rape have been picked up by others who thought the proven sex assualts (via court but not criminal court charges) were thoughts by some posters to be referring to PA (the original posts named Trump but obvioiusly sumbsequent posts used 'he' - hence confusion and some misplaced outrage amongst posters.
To sum up; Trump legally found to be sex pest (other posters defintion not mine)but still President of US (why does America ignore/devalue women). PA not legally found to have to been sex pest (keeping same definition)but clearly enamoured and in all sorts of debt to extreme predator JE, which may well/probably include sexual misconducdcut at very least

CathyorClaire · 16/10/2025 20:50

jonthebatiste · 16/10/2025 17:18

A young girl appears in your life when you're in your 40s. You don't know who she is, where she's from, anything about her life. She's pretty, she's blonde, she's available to you. She's a year older than your own daughter. You have sex with her in circumstances that you know are sordid, underhand, cannot possibly be fully consensual because you have a child her age (give or take) and you know how mature they are or aren't. You absolutely know to the core of your being that you'd never allow your own such girl to do what this girl is doing. You know that this girl has been provided to you by someone you know to be a sexual predator with a predilection for underage girls. You are associating with him because of who he opens doors to for you, because he gives you money, because he provides you with girls, because he takes you to a Caribbean island on his private jet to party with girls the exact same age as your own daughter - and you have sex with them, many of them, repeatedly. Then you go home to your life.

Time goes on. This girl grows to be a woman, and eventually you learn she came from a broken home, abused as a child, poor, American "trailer trash". She starts to advocate for herself, she goes after her pimp and she comes after you. You denigrate her publicly, you deny all knowledge, you lie, you diminish her, you accuse her of misremembering and lying and making stuff up. You get your mum to pay her 10million quid just to make her go away.

She's still only a year older than one of your own daughters. She has a family of her own now.

She ultimately unravels, publicly and privately, all of which you have intimate details of. And you think Andrew IS NOT AT LEAST PARTLY TO BLAME for her taking her own life?

Are you out of your fucking mind? Have you no shame?

Excellent post.

And now we have testimony from beyond the grave that a 'blood prince' of our realm both knew and commented on her age before getting his kicks.

Revolting.

wordler · 16/10/2025 21:00

I think I'm getting jaded and cynical - I've lost any surprise or shock for how many men - even the regular ordinary guys miles apart from the Andrews and the Epsteins of the world - really devalue women and see them only in relation for how they can serve men. How many men don't see why they aren't entitled to much much younger women as some kind of due.

Truetoself · 16/10/2025 21:01

Because she hasn’t embraced the royal family? She knew she was marrying a prince of england bur didn’t bother to learn the national anthem , courtesy etiquette and thought she was more important than she was

BigAnne · 16/10/2025 21:14

Truetoself · 16/10/2025 21:01

Because she hasn’t embraced the royal family? She knew she was marrying a prince of england bur didn’t bother to learn the national anthem , courtesy etiquette and thought she was more important than she was

England doesn't have princess. So M isn't the only one ignorant of the royal family.

lollypop42 · 16/10/2025 21:36

she’s a proven liar and drama queen. Have you seen those podcasts !

BigAnne · 16/10/2025 21:48

BigAnne · 16/10/2025 21:14

England doesn't have princess. So M isn't the only one ignorant of the royal family.

  • princes.
Letmeoutodhere · 16/10/2025 22:23

Truetoself · 16/10/2025 21:01

Because she hasn’t embraced the royal family? She knew she was marrying a prince of england bur didn’t bother to learn the national anthem , courtesy etiquette and thought she was more important than she was

No such thing as a Prince of England.

Truetoself · 17/10/2025 13:59

So Harry was not a Prince? And not from England? @Letmeoutodhere @BigAnne? And it doesn’t matter if I am ignorant if British royalty- I did not marry into it!

Baital · 17/10/2025 14:45

Truetoself · 17/10/2025 13:59

So Harry was not a Prince? And not from England? @Letmeoutodhere @BigAnne? And it doesn’t matter if I am ignorant if British royalty- I did not marry into it!

He is a Prince of the United Kingdom of Grat Britain and Northern Ireland.

England and Scotland united their crowns in 1707 (? around then) so the title of King/Prince of England hasn't existed for over 300 years.

Letmeoutodhere · 17/10/2025 14:46

Truetoself · 17/10/2025 13:59

So Harry was not a Prince? And not from England? @Letmeoutodhere @BigAnne? And it doesn’t matter if I am ignorant if British royalty- I did not marry into it!

Why are you posting on a RF thread if you’re ignorant about the RF?

ozarina · 17/10/2025 16:17

Truetoself · 17/10/2025 13:59

So Harry was not a Prince? And not from England? @Letmeoutodhere @BigAnne? And it doesn’t matter if I am ignorant if British royalty- I did not marry into it!

s reactions series GIF

.

deeahgwitch · 17/10/2025 18:54

You ask in the title of the thread - Why is Meghan hated ? @YourBrickTiger
I don’t think she is hated.
I think she is disliked by many as her actions appear hypocritical and she ( and Harry ) upset the much loved QE2 in her last years - Remember “Recollections may vary…”
I don’t hate her.
I dislike some of the things she does.
I think she is very pretty/ beautiful.
She hit lucky but wants more.

Kimura · 18/10/2025 00:14

sammylady37 · 16/10/2025 16:42

And you know this because of what you’ve seen on tv, in papers, online etc. Reporting of the case. And in the case of the Sussexes, we’ve seen reports from their various court cases, as well as words from their very own mouths in their various interviews, documentaries and Harry’s book. So lots of valid sources on which to base an opinion. So it’s a bit hypocritical and nonsensical to dismiss people who don’t know them as being sad and pathetic for forming opinions based on what they’ve seen online and on tv. Not all sources are the same, or equally reliable, obviously, but plenty are reliable.

It doesn't matter where I saw it. It's not my opinion that he was found liable for sexual assault, is it? It's a fact.

I'm not sat pouring over his social media and every media appearance he makes, gossiping about him with strangers on the internet like some sad old fishwife, as people do with Megan, Harry and the rest of the royal family.

You asked me if I had an opinion on Donald Trump. The answer was 'no'. So what was your point?

sammylady37 · 18/10/2025 06:05

Kimura · 18/10/2025 00:14

It doesn't matter where I saw it. It's not my opinion that he was found liable for sexual assault, is it? It's a fact.

I'm not sat pouring over his social media and every media appearance he makes, gossiping about him with strangers on the internet like some sad old fishwife, as people do with Megan, Harry and the rest of the royal family.

You asked me if I had an opinion on Donald Trump. The answer was 'no'. So what was your point?

Sigh. Ok, I’ll walk you through my point, step by step.

You criticised posters for forming opinions on Meghan and Harry, whom they didn’t know personally, based on what they’d read in papers, seen online or on tv. From what I recall (and I’m not going back to check, so this may be paraphrasing) you called them sad and pathetic, or similar.

I found it hard to believe that you think people shouldn’t be forming opinions on people they don’t know personally. So I chose someone who is a fairly devisive character leading to polarising opinions, and asked if you had an opinion on him, as the vast vast majority do, despite not knowing him personally. You claim not to have an opinion on him per se, merely his politics, and to generally dislike sex pests.

So, next, I asked how you came to be of the opinion he is a sex pest. And your response was that this was fact as proven in court. Which it is. But you only know that because of what you’ve seen on tv, newspapers or online. So your dislike of Trump based on him being a sex pest, is based on what you’ve seen online and in media.

Now, obviously, the quality of what is reported and published can vary greatly with some being objective fact (nothing ‘so called’ about them) and some being individual surmising and opinion. Court findings are facts. In the case of Meghan and Harry, there are lots of court cases on which to base opinion and draw conclusions. There are also the various interviews they’ve given and the documentaries they’ve made, as well as ‘Spare’. They are pretty reliable sources of info on the couple. Unless you think they’re lying. (Though, wasn’t Meghan found to have lied, or ehh, misled the court?) So nobody needs to be forming an opinion based on the nonsensical ramblings of various TikTokers when there is plenty from the horses mouths, as it were.

But it all comes back to all of this and all our opinions being based on what we’ve seen online and in media, seeing as we don’t know M&H or Trump personally. All opinions on them are based on those sources. Some sources are more objective and thus more valid than others. And we have plenty valid sources relating to M&H, so opinions based on those are quite valid. So to criticise someone for using those sources while doing so yourself is hypocritical and disingenuous.

Baital · 18/10/2025 07:47

And while I hesitate to say 'what about Andrew' - he hasn't been convicted of being a 'sex pest', so unless you know him personally I assume you have no opinion of him.or his behaviour? All any of us know about him has come through the media.

prelovedusername · 18/10/2025 08:57

Meghan isn’t hated. She comes in for a lot of criticism but I don’t see evidence of hatred. If there was then she would be a lot less inclined to put herself out so publicly where she might be in physical danger.

She is heartily disliked, but most of that is not from the early days when the media reported on her, but since Megxit when she found her voice and started speaking her truth. If people dislike her, it’s the version of her she wants us to see.

cheezy · 18/10/2025 10:28

I think she is deeply hated by some. There’s a dank corner of Reddit that regularly tear her apart in a most hateful way.

MrsFinkelstein · 18/10/2025 10:34

cheezy · 18/10/2025 10:28

I think she is deeply hated by some. There’s a dank corner of Reddit that regularly tear her apart in a most hateful way.

Same is true for dark corners of all SM regarding Catherine.

Criticism is not hatred. Public figures deliberately putting themselves out publicly do so knowing it will be commented on. Meghan also gets a lot of adulation.

prelovedusername · 18/10/2025 12:29

The people on Reddit don’t hate Meghan. It’s sport to them. Could be anybody.

SumUp · 18/10/2025 16:47

Aethelredtheunsteady · 08/10/2025 07:38

The press was ripping her apart right from the start, including the wedding. If you look at the comparisons between the coverage she got vs Kate (https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ellievhall/meghan-markle-kate-middleton-double-standards-royal) then it goes way back - right down to the flowers she picked for her bouquet.

I think people hate her because the papers (especially the mail) got more clicks with articles slagging her off. As to why she was an easy target to slag off, I know people will deny this till they’re blue in the face, but her race plays a massive part. Let’s face it, the mail isn’t exactly a beacon of tolerance, it knows what its readership wants (hence the straight outta Compton headline where they said the quiet part out loud).

Again, people will deny it but the palace definitely leaks things to the press (Piers Morgan is friends with Camilla for example). She’s an incredibly successful woman in her own right (unlike many women who have married in to the royal family) who is naturally very good at public speaking, meeting people etc. She couldn’t be allowed to overshadow those higher up the line of succession (same as they didn’t want Diana to overshadow Charles).

Throwing Meghan under the bus (and to a lesser extent Harry) has been become and easy distraction for any sort of negative press (Uncle Andy pays off the woman accusing him of sexual assault? Meghan sends emails early in the morning! William and Charles are revealed to be slum landlords? Meghan didn’t actually make her jam at home! Etc etc). One day the smear campaign against Meghan will be used as an example of the effectiveness of propaganda.

There’s a thread here based on a Mail article slagging her off for a video she posted in Paris as she apparently had her feet up near where Diana died. Except if you look at where she was she was over a mile away and basically just posted the type of video loads of people do on holiday (plus she’s there for fashion week, it’s potentially a Devil Wears Prada nod). But if you go on that thread/online you’ll find people who genuinely believe that Meghan made her driver go past the tunnel where Diana died so she could specifically be disrespectful.

Spot on

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread