Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

William's non attendance to important events

1000 replies

Spectre8 · 20/08/2025 07:33

Since there is a flurry of discussion on another thread its probably best to create a thread for it to take place here and not derail another one.

So William is not attending a number of important events the recent one being the VJ day..lots of you think he should have after all he is the future King and if he can't make time for these things then it begs the question what is the point of them?

So discuss away...what should he turning up to, what is his actual role if he starts to not do these types of things...

OP posts:
stillavid · 20/08/2025 11:44

It is interesting the comparison to the number of engagements the late Queen and Charles did/do.

Looking at the massive issues with their children - Andrew and Harry specifically, maybe a few less opening of community centres and a little more parenting wouldn't have been a bad thing.

I mean the whole concept of a royal family is quite insane and I do not think any of them work hard in the traditional sense. I mean what exactly were all those boxes of documents the Queen was reviewing back in the day - it always reminded me of the post office set I had a a child ;)

2dogsandabudgie · 20/08/2025 11:44

jeffgoldblum · 20/08/2025 11:38

Maybe she attended Wimbledon because as you say it was less tiring and because of the absolute bizarre hysterical reaction to her previous absence.

Is that where some people on social media thought that she had died and the Royal family had covered it up, or she'd had a face-lift or that her and William had separated.

Even on this thread you have people claiming to know every aspect of their lives. It's madness!

LifeOfAShowGirl · 20/08/2025 11:47

stillavid · 20/08/2025 11:44

It is interesting the comparison to the number of engagements the late Queen and Charles did/do.

Looking at the massive issues with their children - Andrew and Harry specifically, maybe a few less opening of community centres and a little more parenting wouldn't have been a bad thing.

I mean the whole concept of a royal family is quite insane and I do not think any of them work hard in the traditional sense. I mean what exactly were all those boxes of documents the Queen was reviewing back in the day - it always reminded me of the post office set I had a a child ;)

Andrew’s issues are not down to the fact his mother worked hard. Neither are Harry’s.

the fact of it is, the next generation of the royal family enjoys the celebrity aspect too much and the work aspect too little.

dottiedodah · 20/08/2025 11:50

Mylovelygreendress I had Cancer at similar time to you. I still feel exhausted a year off chemo! People who have not been ill like this don't understand the long term effects. Every one expects I'm "over it" but as you say it changes you .the Cancer nurse says everyone is different. Still have 3 months checks and feel worried before hand .difficult to relax kate is younger with a young family. PW wants to be there for his wife .KC went so I don't see an issue really
K

mamagogo1 · 20/08/2025 11:50

I think he had a crap childhood and doesn’t want this for his kids. He does want he has to and no more. He didn’t ask to be royal and gas even spoken out about how his life is dictated by others and he slipped his police escort many a time. Nobody knows his thoughts on the future but i could envision him on becoming king putting the crown estates into full government controls d refusing the civil list instead just taking expenses when doing tasks asked by the government to undertake. He seems pretty uncomfortable being in the limelight and prefers charity focused work that doesn’t appear on the court circular (so not official engagements but perhaps more helpful to society). Buck house etc are essentially ceremonial they can be managed by the government.

OffTheHookAtLast · 20/08/2025 11:50

Serenster · 20/08/2025 11:40

Your employer owes you a duty of care though.I presume in their scenario the public owes them that? It’s not very evident in threads like this!

What does that even mean? William working is nothing to do with our duty of care. No one else in the country would be allowed to work as little as William because his wife was ill. I have to go to work, as does my husband. The duty of care from my employer doesn’t extend to not me or my husband doing our jobs.

The levels of excuse making for the Waleses is astounding.

Thedom · 20/08/2025 11:52

I do think he should have attended one of the events, it is a bad look, he has the luxury of being able to fly in and out even if his attendance if only for a half day event.

2dogsandabudgie · 20/08/2025 11:53

LifeOfAShowGirl · 20/08/2025 11:44

There are multiple other engagements she could have done. The point is, it looks fucking awful - they pick and choose what they want to do and it doesn’t work that way.

That's just your opinion though. I wouldn't judge anyone who's been through chemotherapy on what they should or should not be capable of doing.

jeffgoldblum · 20/08/2025 11:53

2dogsandabudgie · 20/08/2025 11:44

Is that where some people on social media thought that she had died and the Royal family had covered it up, or she'd had a face-lift or that her and William had separated.

Even on this thread you have people claiming to know every aspect of their lives. It's madness!

Yes , that was exactly it!

LifeOfAShowGirl · 20/08/2025 11:54

mamagogo1 · 20/08/2025 11:50

I think he had a crap childhood and doesn’t want this for his kids. He does want he has to and no more. He didn’t ask to be royal and gas even spoken out about how his life is dictated by others and he slipped his police escort many a time. Nobody knows his thoughts on the future but i could envision him on becoming king putting the crown estates into full government controls d refusing the civil list instead just taking expenses when doing tasks asked by the government to undertake. He seems pretty uncomfortable being in the limelight and prefers charity focused work that doesn’t appear on the court circular (so not official engagements but perhaps more helpful to society). Buck house etc are essentially ceremonial they can be managed by the government.

Oh the heart bleeds. He could easily step away and live life privately if he so wishes.

LifeOfAShowGirl · 20/08/2025 11:56

2dogsandabudgie · 20/08/2025 11:53

That's just your opinion though. I wouldn't judge anyone who's been through chemotherapy on what they should or should not be capable of doing.

It’s my opinion and I stand by it. They both come across as lazy and entitled.

Spectre8 · 20/08/2025 11:59

MrsLeonFarrell · 20/08/2025 10:53

I don't think William shouldn't turn up at events. I do however believe that he doesn't have to duplicate what previous generations have done, we live in very different times.

I don't think the optics of William attending the VE Day and not the VJ Day events are good. They tend to reinforce the narrative that what happened in the East is forgotten. Having said that I don't think calling him names is appropriate or indeed useful.

As I said upthread it will be interesting going forward to see how William chooses to priorise once he is King. I believe there is a debate to be had about the place of the monarchy in the modern age, about expectations spoken and unspoken. What I find pointless is name calling a rich family because they live like every other rich family. Let's discuss the place of the royals in the 21st Century, what we expect and if those expectations are appropriate. Personally I think one thing that needs to go is expecting them to behave as if they are like ordinary working people. They aren't. I notice that the "normal family" comes from the press not the royals and it's a useful stick to use in the praise/ condemn clickbait cycle.

I don't have a problem with multiple holidays or arranging their work round the children. But I do think that sometimes they get the balance wrong and this is one of those times.

Yet you are okay to call other rich people names like grifters etc. Your okay to criticise other rich families living a rich life...

OP posts:
Cynic17 · 20/08/2025 11:59

hangerup · 20/08/2025 10:03

Respectfully the Gloucesters are irrelevant.

I never heard of them till now!

The Gloucesters have been working hard to support the Monarchy for over 50 years! The Duke even had to give up his career as an architect to do this, after the death of his elder brother, Prince William. He just got on with it, and his wife supported him.

2dogsandabudgie · 20/08/2025 11:59

LifeOfAShowGirl · 20/08/2025 11:56

It’s my opinion and I stand by it. They both come across as lazy and entitled.

You come across as someone with very little empathy.

MrsLeonFarrell · 20/08/2025 12:00

Spectre8 · 20/08/2025 11:59

Yet you are okay to call other rich people names like grifters etc. Your okay to criticise other rich families living a rich life...

I'm not sure what you are referring to.

cumbriaisbest · 20/08/2025 12:00

They are idle, dim, posh and entitled.

Give anybody else the job for a week, we could actually make a diffference.

I brought up 2 kids and worked, absolutely zero extended family. Now that was tough.

LifeOfAShowGirl · 20/08/2025 12:01

2dogsandabudgie · 20/08/2025 11:59

You come across as someone with very little empathy.

I have work colleagues who are working well into their seventies, while their partners are in care homes, just to make ends meet. I have colleagues who have been through awful health struggles and have to work, relying on food banks because they can’t work full time. I have colleagues whose lives have been ruined over much, much less than some of the accusations the royal family faces.

So excuse me if I don’t feel sorry for them, sitting in their castles, so out of touch with reality that they call going to the tennis and the football “work”.

Spectre8 · 20/08/2025 12:06

Serenster · 20/08/2025 11:15

My opinion is that William should have attended one of the commemorations for VJ day. As future head of the armed forces, former serving officer and senior royal family member, I thought his absence was notable, and not in a good way.

However, unlike many posters on this thread, I regard members of the royal family as human beings fulfilling a constitutional role first and foremost, not performing monkeys who have to dance for us. I also remember there were threads like this last year, accusing William of being lazy and workshy when he didn’t attend the memorial service for his godfather King Constantine of Greece. We only later discovered that he and Kate had very recently found out that unexpectedly her surgery earlier that year had revealed she had cancer.

Just a reminder: we don’t know their lives. Sometimes, judging other people so harshly rebounds on you.

Except we know they were on holiday...its not like this is their first holiday of the year that could be used to justify it...

OP posts:
stillavid · 20/08/2025 12:06

LifeOfAShowGirl · 20/08/2025 11:47

Andrew’s issues are not down to the fact his mother worked hard. Neither are Harry’s.

the fact of it is, the next generation of the royal family enjoys the celebrity aspect too much and the work aspect too little.

So the Queen and Charles were just very poor parents? And in my opinion part of both of their jobs was to manage their children and their roles within their business and they have both failed at that.

OffTheHookAtLast · 20/08/2025 12:07

2dogsandabudgie · 20/08/2025 11:59

You come across as someone with very little empathy.

@LifeOfAShowGirl you don’t, you’re fine. You just come across as someone who hasn’t drunk the Kool Aid.

IAmATorturedPoet · 20/08/2025 12:07

hangerup · 20/08/2025 11:41

On no the hardcore crew have arrived!

🙄

LBFseBrom · 20/08/2025 12:09

LifeOfAShowGirl · 20/08/2025 12:01

I have work colleagues who are working well into their seventies, while their partners are in care homes, just to make ends meet. I have colleagues who have been through awful health struggles and have to work, relying on food banks because they can’t work full time. I have colleagues whose lives have been ruined over much, much less than some of the accusations the royal family faces.

So excuse me if I don’t feel sorry for them, sitting in their castles, so out of touch with reality that they call going to the tennis and the football “work”.

You have three lots of colleagues! Well done.

I don't think anyone is asking for sympathy for 'them'.

LifeOfAShowGirl · 20/08/2025 12:09

stillavid · 20/08/2025 12:06

So the Queen and Charles were just very poor parents? And in my opinion part of both of their jobs was to manage their children and their roles within their business and they have both failed at that.

Potentially, or the entire concept of royalty which puts people on a pedestal for the sake of their birth is one that creates unsavoury characters. I guess we’ll never know.

(I also don’t think Harry is anywhere near as bad as Andrew. Harry has had missteps, but he’s never been accused of the things Andrew has)

LifeOfAShowGirl · 20/08/2025 12:09

LBFseBrom · 20/08/2025 12:09

You have three lots of colleagues! Well done.

I don't think anyone is asking for sympathy for 'them'.

Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit 😉

PumpkinPieAlibi · 20/08/2025 12:12

JeremiahBullfrog · 20/08/2025 10:06

"Man with sick wife and three kids has holiday in August" shocker.

He doesn't have to go to every single bloody thing. You don't go to work every day of the year do you? The King was there, it's not as if the royal family just shrugged their collective shoulders and decided they couldn't be bothered.

A president's son wouldn't attend anything, would he?

Royalists' arguments are truly baffling sometimes.

Of course a President's son wouldn't attend anything. He's not going to be the next President is he? He didn't become the automatic next-in-line when his father was inaugurated and he has no constitutional role does he?

And obviously William doesn't have to go to 'every single bloody thing'. But he's currently at absolutely no risk of that is he? The problem is he hardly does anything.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread