Talks for reconciliation

[LadyJaneGrey18]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-14899657/King-Charles-Prince-Harry-aides-meet-London-secret-peace-summit.html

What to make of this??

I think it’s fair to say it’s not something that’s easily historically evidenced….

But as I posted below, circumstances change and my personal view is that their situation may potentially quite tenuous in terms of H’s wellbeing and their finances.

Options may be quite limited and as much as posters are suggesting “Arm Candy” men of such wealth have a plethora of women to pick their dating pool from and I can’t see (as beautiful as she is) anyone wanting the baggage and propensity for self publicity.

Yes - I certainly can’t see why a mega-wealthy man would marry her. Her record of indiscretion, publicity-seeking and her complicated baggage would be off-putting and (in that shallow world) she’ll be late forties soon - a crime in Hollywood, I’m sure!

'No, we played no part in the writing of 'Finding Freedeom'.'

She has a degree in international relations.

I am also interested in the point that the monarch has some jurisdiction over their grandchildren. Will have to look that up unless other posters know more with regards to this. Recall some of the issues when the Yorks divorced and the Queen could intervene on mqtters with B&E. It would also be interseting as Archie is a British citizen having been born here whilst Lilli is American though dual citizenship would apply.

Anyhow, back to the the thread. I would have misgivings of their return simply from the cost to taxpayers, which i think is the main motivation.

@Foolsgold74 there are supermarkets in skegness which have vacancies for shelf stockers too!! they could both work minimum wage and unsocial hours!!!

The very point they're thinking it needs to be denied really implicates them. And shows that they're watching the press/internet to see how the meeting was taken.

"No, your honour, I'm definitely a rabbit..."

For me, two things have cooked their goose: insulting the entire population of the UK by M telling Oprah Winfrey that their £32m wedding wasn't actually a wedding but just for show, and H saying nothing when Mmocked QEII with her shameful curtsey for Netflix. In the end, the institution wins out over family. On that basis, they will not be returning.

So much good will thrown away. Hey, H, about 'Spaff' as the title for your second volume?

No way would Meghan want to lose her title by remarrying .

The fact the Sussex camp is denying they leaked makes it more likely that they did, imo.

Yes the bloody wedding that we paid for the entitlement really did it for me. They surely could have insisted on a private low key wedding as Beatrice had during Covid. The money it cost that could have been spent to benefit so many people who need it.

Absolute peak narcissism- insisting on a massive fuss being made of you, then pretending you never wanted any of it (cfAmanda in Motherland)!

According to the telegraph, Sussex team saying they didn’t leak the info

Well I suppose the NY based photographer could just have been passing the building and just happened to look up and see 3 people on a balcony . He then could have thought hmm I recognise these people even from a distance . I wonder what’s going on here ?
What a stroke of luck !

They would say that, wouldn't they?

.

In a nutshell!!!

I will join the queue to apologise to Giveme[GreekproductIcan'trememberthenameof]. I greatly enjoy her posts but thought, for the first time, that she'd got this one very wrong.

The wedding not of the Oprah interview really did it for me too. She didn’t have to have that many bridesmaids. She didn’t have to invite all those celebs. She didn’t have to have such an expensive dress. If she really hated it all then it could have been done much more cheaply and simply.

But she didn’t hate it all. She loved it. It was her Princess Kate moment and she wanted it. To pretend otherwise is childish. She must believe we are all idiots.

Thanks for the replies and opinions.

I can't find the post now but someone sa

Oops sorry - went off too soon!

Soneone said they'd feel let down by Charles if he allowed H back, and daft as it sounds, this is how I'd feel too.

My late Dh was a staunch republican for most of his adult life. Then it came to a point where he had to work on a project in which Charles was heavily involved. After their first meeting, he begrudgingly admitted to having liked him but felt maybe that was because Charles had been on a charm offensive.

As the weeks went on, he admitted to liking him more. And then to respecting him and his opinion. And finally, to looking forward to their meetings.

I would sort of somehow, stupidly, feel that I would be letting dh down, if Charles did accept H and M back into the fold, and I was ok with it! That probably only makes sense in my own head though!

No-one will remember or care about Harry 40 years from now. They’ll know about KC because he was the king. Harry has made himself irrelevant and is hugely unpopular nowadays.

Harry rejected his royal heritage and sold his family for dollars. He’s panicking now, but I see no way back for the dim ex-prince.

So you think William and Katr should also have a toned down wedding?

10 or even 5 years from now, many will be only vaguely aware that Charles has another son and William has a brother.

Being the 'spare' is really such a great gig. Nearly all the perks of royalty with few of the responsibilities. He gave up all that for a walk on role in his wife's twerking video?

The only way your comment would make sense is if William and Kate had publicly stated they hadn't wanted the state level wedding and were already married anyway.

They didn’t ungratefully and ungraciously rubbish their wedding afterwards, sneering at it by calling it a spectacle for the public.

They are just a way classier act than the Montecito Moaners.