Natasha Archer’s Instagram Following

[tataler]

I’m somewhat fascinated by the instagram following of Kate’s former stylist and personal assistant of 15 years.

Understandable to monitor fashion blogs like whatmeghanwore but what’s the interest in Heather Dorak or Daniel Martin?

She even followed Meghan and asever before hastily unfollowing - why hide now?

Perhaps part of her new luxury fashion consultancy is keeping tabs on in-laws friends and associates.

I understand you’re new here, but generally when people acknowledge a mistake and apologise for it, it’s good manners to say thank you and move on.

This new charm offensive’s going swimmingly isn’t it?

Why is it simplistic and crude because I’m not agreeing with what you are saying?

Hahaha you see i tell you why they are not tidy and no you can't accept that, you have to decide that you know better an now its because its full of bile.

Why do you think I wrote that post to explain why its untidy. Next time.im not going to explain myself because people like you think you know best and the truth well you can't read my.mind, you dont know me you are making it up through your own personal filter.

Honestly @Spectre8 you do sound very cross, and I’m not sure why. Post away, but I don’t think we have anything to say in terms of an exchange of views.

@Spectre8

I can always manage to read your posts fine, it's a way of bullying you because you have a different viewpoint to the regulars on here

I’m putting my hand up and admitting to introducing that phrase, just so @itcontinuesforever doesn't feel unfairly blamed for it. Still stand by it though!

I can usually understand the posts, but there are times when a whole bunch of random letters have been strung together. It isn’t difficult to proof read a post, on a train or otherwise. It seems a shame not to
make sure that your point has come across clearly. If there are numerous typos of this sort in one post, as happened yesterday for example, then I do not believe it is possible for anyone to understand them. As for bullying because views differ, that is nonsense when the poster rarely makes a
point about the thread subject, but rather chooses to attack other posters 🤷‍♀️

No worries, preloved! I have a book called Teach Yerself Lanky (my husband’s from Lancs) and it’s in there - and I do like it really- just not when used in the context that it was.
Another book in the series, Learn Yerself Scouse, is another source of these gems.

And me! eh Jeff! 😉

Actually I think Kate would! She wouldn’t let someone burn to death, Meghan however……..

Sigh. You’ve combined 2 unconnected things to make yourself sound like the victim.

The illogicality of your statement makes it hard to respond. There are 2 separate issues:

1. I think your view of the subject is simplistic.

2. You don’t agree with my view of the subject.

I don’t think we’re going to get much further than that, tbh.

I’ll be honest, it’s not my usual vernacular, but it seemed right for the moment!

I’m sorry, I don’t understand what you mean here?

We should form a support group! 🤣

Only because the camera crew was late...

Some of the supporters of the Sussexes who left after the where Kate had the ability to be objective, even if just to prove non bias. It gives weight to your point of view. There is no member of the royal family that I wouldn't criticise and no member I wouldn't support if I felt the criticism was unjust. There are quite a few areas that both Meghan and Catherine bear the brunt simply because they are women. On a thread where a most despicable viewpoint was aired that effects many women and most would be appalled at whoever was the victim, it was glossed over by some as it wasn't worth their time as it wasnt their team and others called mean girls for having an opinion that is far less degrading to women and based on a viewpoint. Some people are playing a team sport with others really not in the competition. It just removes credibility

It’s the old trick of claiming victim status. Tiresome…

Fine don't read those ones then like I said I dont give that much of a fuck since I come on here to kill some time. What isn't ok is then to denigrate me by saying I have poor literacy and when I explain why some of my posts have mistakes to then not even apologise for persoanlly attacking me.

I dont personally attack other people im asking them why, like why does the fact their wedding which cost you approx £1 bother you that much after all this time that you feel the need to come and keep going on about it .. genuinely why? I dont understand why anyone is... when people rant about how much the rf costs us they say the same...its very little individually who cares.

How many posts do we see of people say id love to understand why a supporter likes them...so its okay for them what to ask questions to understand ut not if I do because if I do im attacking a poster.

Yet im labelled a Sussex squad member, someone who lacks intelligence and has poor literacy and so on. And you say I attack people lol

OK then

Oh give over @Spectre8 . Questions like the wedding one have been answered ad nauseam by a plethora of posters over a plethora of threads, which you know because you are on them. You just ignore the people answering you in good faith and then ask the same questions again the next time.

I’m finding it very strange when posters claim never to attack other posters when there is ample evidence all over the forum!

@Spectre8 honestly and kindly you sound as if you would be better killing some time in another way as this seems to be affecting you way too much judging by your recent posts.

Fine don't read those ones then like I said I dont give that much of a fuck since I come on here to kill some time. What isn't ok is then to denigrate me by saying I have poor literacy and when I explain why some of my posts have mistakes to then not even apologise for persoanlly attacking me.

Spectre - I have no problem with typos, spelling and grammar mistakes. But when it's actually impossible to either read or understand what's being said, it does become a problem. There are degrees!

And I could say (I wouldn't have, but since you've gone on the attack here) it's disrespectful to just bung any old stuff on the net. Check it through, at least. It's as if you don't respect your audience enough to do that. I make mistakes - we all do - that's not the issue. You have openly admitted that you don't give a fuck about how your posts come across, and that sounds rude.

And also - you do attack individuals - I've seen it often, and you've attacked me. I do have strong feelings (as I'm sure you do) on this subject, but I try to keep it to the post rather than the poster. It' s always creepy when a poster shows that they are keeping tabs on you from thread to thread - not saying you do this, but some do. I've read things about myself such as 'I notice you always have a lot to say defending the royals'. That is creepy!

Your posts are always quite angry, though, and on the whole, recently, these threads have been mainly good-humoured. My message is: lighten up - it doesn't have to be personal.

It doesnt affect me but God forbid i stand up for myself. Maybe people should go find something else entertaining then two people overseas who clearly affect them alot they need to be here constantly bitching about them...goes both ways dont you think

You say lighten up then lighten up its a forum so what if there are mistakes in posts lighten up its not that serious ...take your own advice before dishing it out. And ill only get personal if you do it first...cos ill treat people back the way they treat me. So maybe check your own behaviour first not that you ever apologise for it but expect it to apologise for mine