Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Megs gift shop wine

1000 replies

AtIusvue · 29/06/2025 09:02

As per the DM, we are told Meg is using Fairwinds Estate winery for her rose. Sounds nice.
But a Reddit user has discovered, that Fairwinds winery is just a brand under the umbrella of Wine gift shop. They do corporate gifts and print on demand. Oh Meg, as ever

https://winegiftshop.com

Megs gift shop wine
OP posts:
Thread gallery
25
Serenster · 30/06/2025 13:29

When you are using your royal title to promote your commercial business? Quite a lot. Not to mention using the HRH which you expressly agreed not to use…

AtIusvue · 30/06/2025 13:30

Eh….Duchess of Sussex is slap bang all over As ever.

What is this person on? I think they’ve been snorting the flower sprinkles!

Megs gift shop wine
OP posts:
smilesy · 30/06/2025 13:30

AtIusvue · 30/06/2025 12:49

Anybody read this yet!!!

Was way worse than we thought. Harry ruined his relationship with the Queen and was rude to her.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14859895/Harry-Meghan-Queen-upset-royal-wedding-rows.html

The bit that rings true is where it says “Harry thought the Queen could do anything” in relation to having the AOfC to preside over the service. Reminds me of Harry seeming to think that the King can now overrule the decisions of RAVEC with relation to his security. He really doesn’t understand anything about how the monarchy works 🙄

AtIusvue · 30/06/2025 13:31

smilesy · 30/06/2025 13:30

The bit that rings true is where it says “Harry thought the Queen could do anything” in relation to having the AOfC to preside over the service. Reminds me of Harry seeming to think that the King can now overrule the decisions of RAVEC with relation to his security. He really doesn’t understand anything about how the monarchy works 🙄

That’s a good point. You can see the parallels

OP posts:
Serenster · 30/06/2025 13:32

Where is the Sussex name included anywhere?
It only states by Meghan. Please show me any mention of Sussex as ever instagram or the site.
what a strange lie to tell

When you have directly accused another poster of lying, only to have to concede you were mistaken just a handful of posts later, I think more than “Fairs” is appropriate as an apology…

tataler · 30/06/2025 13:32

As far as I’m concerned she doesn’t use the titles enough for all the noise.

Not enough for William running to Sykes of the DB talking about how he’s going to strip the titles once be comes King 🤣🤣

tataler · 30/06/2025 13:33

Serenster · 30/06/2025 13:32

Where is the Sussex name included anywhere?
It only states by Meghan. Please show me any mention of Sussex as ever instagram or the site.
what a strange lie to tell

When you have directly accused another poster of lying, only to have to concede you were mistaken just a handful of posts later, I think more than “Fairs” is appropriate as an apology…

Shall I grovel 🤣🤣

AtIusvue · 30/06/2025 13:34

Someone is not liking these recent headlines! must be an upsetting day. The jam scam and more wedding story woes.

OP posts:
JSMill · 30/06/2025 13:35

AtIusvue · 30/06/2025 12:49

Anybody read this yet!!!

Was way worse than we thought. Harry ruined his relationship with the Queen and was rude to her.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14859895/Harry-Meghan-Queen-upset-royal-wedding-rows.html

It’s really sad to think of a grandmother thinking their dgs is marrying someone who has engineered and isn’t right. It’s also interesting that the Archbishop of Canterbury wasn’t the automatic choice for the ceremony but H apparently wanted the top man, in keeping with his perceived status. Lots of people have said the Queen didn’t look happy at the wedding and now I believe that was true.

tataler · 30/06/2025 13:36

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Mylovelygreendress · 30/06/2025 13:37

tataler · 30/06/2025 13:27

Fairs, the webpage does mention Sussex.

whats wrong with sending a gift with a title card?

They were told not to use HRH .

ranthanbore · 30/06/2025 13:37

tataler · 30/06/2025 13:02

On aseverofficial? Never saw hive stuff on there.

like I said blinded by the hate.

Interesting you got my comment deleted..touched a nerve?

MrsLeonFarrell · 30/06/2025 13:37

tataler · 30/06/2025 13:32

As far as I’m concerned she doesn’t use the titles enough for all the noise.

Not enough for William running to Sykes of the DB talking about how he’s going to strip the titles once be comes King 🤣🤣

I hear the screeching of goalposts being wrenched into a new position.

AtIusvue · 30/06/2025 13:37

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I thought that was As ever?…..food for the deranged.

OP posts:
tataler · 30/06/2025 13:37

Mylovelygreendress · 30/06/2025 13:37

They were told not to use HRH .

I thought it was commercially?

tataler · 30/06/2025 13:38

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Serenster · 30/06/2025 13:39

tataler · 30/06/2025 13:37

I thought it was commercially?

It was being used commercially. Meghan, jam entrepreneur, talking about her gift of jam to Jamie Kern Lima, on a podcast to promote Meghan’s jam business is about as clearly commercial as you can get.

tataler · 30/06/2025 13:40

ranthanbore · 30/06/2025 13:37

Interesting you got my comment deleted..touched a nerve?

Who are you again?

tataler · 30/06/2025 13:40

Serenster · 30/06/2025 13:39

It was being used commercially. Meghan, jam entrepreneur, talking about her gift of jam to Jamie Kern Lima, on a podcast to promote Meghan’s jam business is about as clearly commercial as you can get.

Sorry I don’t class that as commercial. That’s a massive reach.

Serenster · 30/06/2025 13:41

tataler · 30/06/2025 13:40

Sorry I don’t class that as commercial. That’s a massive reach.

Sorry, I don’t class your opinion as determinative of the issue.

AtIusvue · 30/06/2025 13:41

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Run along for your next bottle of As ever wine…can’t wait to see what you will post when you’ve downed that

OP posts:
Nagginthenag · 30/06/2025 13:41

It's all smoke and mirrors. The website may not say Meghan is making the jam from raspberries grown in her garden, but her homemade jam was so loved by friends she decided to produce it commercially - the commercial drop shipped factory made jam is a very different beast to the small batch homemade.

There is an Instagram picture of her filling silk tea bags with flowers and leaves - a suggestion that this is what you're buying if you purchase As Ever tea off the website - not generic drop shipped herbal teas with a huge mark up.

From the As Ever website:
'Created by Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, As ever welcomes you to a collection of products, each inspired by her long-lasting love of cooking, entertaining, and hostessing with ease.'
If that doesn't suggest that the products have been created especially for As Ever I don't know what does.

' With a dedication to timeless design and curated craftsmanship...... ' referring to the packaging perhaps? So that's OK - the jars, packets and labels were created specifically for As Ever - doesn't matter what mass produced cheap product is in those jars, at least the labels are authentic.

' Meghan’s titles are nowhere near aseverofficial.'

Well, they obviously are - the para above clearly states 'Meghan, Duchess of Sussex '....

It's all guff - no-one would pay the prices she's charging for the generic product being sold. People are buying it because they think it's some kind of bespoke artisanal product, more fool them, but they think that way because of how the product is being inauthentically, dishonestly presented.

Meghan may not be saying 'I made this jam with raspberries gathered in the dewy dawn light in my ethereal garden, and I sourced the flower sprinkles in a sunny California meadow, loading them into the panniers carried by my favourite unicorn'(slight exaggeration but you know what I mean), but that's the implication from the insta and website

Profhilodisaster · 30/06/2025 13:41

tataler · 30/06/2025 13:37

I thought it was commercially?

They are not allowed to use them publicly or commercially.

ranthanbore · 30/06/2025 13:42

tataler · 30/06/2025 13:40

Sorry I don’t class that as commercial. That’s a massive reach.

😂 you are hilarious!

tataler · 30/06/2025 13:42

Serenster · 30/06/2025 13:41

Sorry, I don’t class your opinion as determinative of the issue.

Fairs

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.