How can Harry be so deluded?

[HiRen]

The paranoia deepens

I don't really know what to conclude from this other than that Harry must feel the victim of a deep state conspiracy. Being a spoilt brat, and not understanding that he's there to serve his country rather than the country being there to serve him, can't help. Even if he did fear strategic delays, why would he jump to the conclusion that specific individuals have it in for him, rather than that there's a bigger picture to consider?

I just can't fathom the depths of misery and confusion he must experience on a daily basis. He must think his whole life was a lie until he met Meghan. I really do think things with Harry are much worse than they seem. Which puts an entirely different, and much darker, gloss on all of Meghan's utterings of her era of joy.

I honestly wouldn't want to be in their orbit. And I wonder whether those who remain in their orbit are desperate, whether as friends or employees. They're too much.

No I’ve no idea. But if you’re going to bring your husbands life experiences into this in order to attack another man then you need to be taking a long hard look in the mirror at yourself.

Just leave your husband out of the conversation. Stop using him as gun to fire your bullet.

No, I pointed out that some people change their surname for very good reasons. It's not difficult. You're the one who needs to take a long hard look in the mirror. You've turned my stomach.

They did mention how the Royal family PR would fabricate stories and sell them to the press when they were trying to cover up something else. I wonder what the cover up is this time ??

The feeling is entirely mutual.

I'm sure your DH had very valid reasons for wanting to change his surname.

Did he, like Harry, go to the passport office and say, this is the name in my birth certificate but I'd rather, for personal reasons, have muy passport issued in this other name which I much prefer?

I guess it could be Harry is trying to distract from his wife shaking her arse in a 4 year old video, but I think he's on to a loser with that.

What has Charles done according to you that was deserving of the expletive you labelled him with? Do you know him and his relationship with his son? Do you have any idea that it bears any similarities to that of your unfortunate husband? Or are you merely projecting?

... while keeping all the titles and styles that go with the original name?

Did I say it’s not? Nope, have problems reading do you?

I don’t believe that he was abused but neither of us really know do we?

Barbara Barnes was William’s nanny from very early days . She was with the family for years but Diana became increasingly jealous of her strong bond with the boys .,

That deflection would work better if this story had actually originated with the palace but it didn't. It came from Harry.

Again for this post I wish there was still the laughing reaction.

*sorry quote fail!

There is no evidence that Harry was neglected or abused. Despite what he has written having one less sausage than your older brother is not abuse.

Agree he does look like Charles & strong resemblance with Charles’ Father Prince Philip when he was young man .

Agree with this, he takes after that side of the family, and William looks more like his mother. Harry has the Spencer red hair but is otherwise really like Charles.

That's not even slightly correct. Just because you have a high profile doesn't give anyone the right to invade your privacy.

i wonder who told you that

Does anyone think once the Queens cousins die,’there will be a change to have only those direct in line of succession being Prince and Princess, with title also bestowed to the spouse when married to heir or heir apparent ?

The exception being Princess Anne as she is the Princess Royal? Anne’s children don’t use titles and neither do Edward’s.

It would remove Andrew’s HRH Prince Title, his daughters, but also removing Harry’s HRH Prince title and that of his children?

Harry couldn’t claim he was being targeted if everyone else loses their HRH.

The Guardian says so on the article

Just because you have a high profile doesn't give anyone the right to invade your privacy.

Someone should have told Harry that before he wrote Spare. And it wasn't only people with a high profile whose privacy he invaded.

I’d forgotten about her. She was with them u til William was about 4. But even if there was a 3rd nanny in the mix it hardly makes a revolving door of them.

Exactly. That poor woman that he mounted behind a pub as he charmingly put it...

"Sources close to the Duke".

No, you're not a spoiled brat for not wanting to undertake any role someone else has decided for your before you are born. As I said upthread, if he'd said he wanted to emigrate and stop working for the RF, most people would have wished him and his family the best and to please come back to visit.

You ARE a spoiled brat if you want all the amazing and often unique perks of a role that you were born into, but undertake none of the accompanying duties. He was a grown man. Until he was told no earlier this year, he STILL wanted the taxpayer of a country he doesn't even live in to fund ad hoc security of the level and sort he wanted. Because he wanted it and thought he knew better than everyone else. THAT is being a spoiled brat.

Whining about the press and using it to feather your nest: THAT is being a spoiled brat.

Going on global television at the age of nearly 40, a married man with a child and another one on the way, complaining your daddy has cut of your allowance: THAT is a spoiled brat.

Sitting next to your wife describing her taxpayer-funded wedding as a "spectacle" for the little people: THAT is a spoiled brat.

Those are just the headline big ticket ones. Almost all his litigation has also been spoiled brat behaviour, except elements of the phone hacking cases.

Want me to go on? (Not that I can be bothered.)

I think it could and should happen now, but not retrospectively. So everyone who currently has HRH titles can keep them, but going forward only the direct heir and their children will be HRH Prince(ss). That is already the case in most if not all of the European monarchies.

Really the late Queen should have done it because it would have preempted a lot of this. But that wasn't her style.