Harry's new interview 2

[Viviennemary]

I just thought I would start second thread since I noticed the first one is full. It has certainly dominated media reporting. I saw a snippet on Sky news earlier. A document from Harry saying its a dereliction of duty to stop his security. Erm who just whizzed off to the USA and left all the duties behind. I havent watched the whole interview. I wonder if he'll appeal again.

Harrys legs look so out of proportion to the rest of him

I saw the picture again and immediately noticed one of his legs looking very strange and it immediately reminded me of one of the wedding pictures where he had a very strangely bent leg.

It's her saying " look - they are walking away from you" 🙄

Yes. That’s exactly what it’s supposed to say but even that made me laugh. It was just so ridiculous. And whilst the children are completely innocent in this mess I did actually think - and good bloody riddance Harry.

But most of all I want to shout, “don’t take them into the forest - the wicked witch is going to get all of you.

Why release it now? To send a message to his father that he has grandchildren he may never see again unless he helps sort out Harry’s security costs

I suspect the security costs don’t even come into it.

All these photoshopped images 🙄.
On a more superficial level, it's about the clicks. They're celebrities and need to keep the images coming. He got headlines because of that interview, so she releases yet another image of the back of the children,this time with him, for added interest.

One of his friends has spoken out. I wonder if others will follow?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-14681329/EDEN-CONFIDENTIAL-Prince-Harry-Ben-Goldsmith.html

No invite for them to the Met Gala again, that must hurt especially when bestie Serena was there accompanied by Edward Enniful. They are on the D list and slipping.

In so many contractor-client relationships it's the case that the client thinks they've hired the expert to perform tasks under their instruction, not to advise and own the brief.

I can see this in the "joy" era of Meghan.

I genuinely hope that Harry has got someone sensible to support him, none of this backlash can be doing his already fragile mental health any good.

They do love each other. It’s what they love about each other that’s telling. Harry has been ungentlemanly enough to comment on their sex life, Markle was known to be looking for a rich husband. They both found what they were looking for but let’s not pretend it’s a fairy story.

Sorry, Ida, edited to say not aimed at you but amplifying your post!

The reaction online for the photo by those who side with Harry is more of the hypocrisy. If it's good for Harry and his children to walk away but somehow Charles and William are not allowed to do the same with Harry. It must be the longest goodbye in history that's not actually a goodbye it's a look I'm still here. Maybe Harry's excuse is the same as the lawyers didn't tell me it would end up with nothing but a massive bill, no one told him if you continually speak shit about your family and break all their trust then they won't trust you again.

You would wonder what kind of relationship they have though, I can't imagine it is a very happy one.

Meghan seems almost high on their fame and at the same time comes across as insincere and fake and in a 'fake it 'till you make it' mode.

Harry, on the other hand, looks so, so unhappy, particularly when he is with his wife. He is repeatedly saying he misses his family and his country, she never wants to set foot in his home country and she wants nothing to do with his family, so they are completely at odds about something that is very fundamental and important to most people in a relationship.

There is no way that can translate into the 'in love' relationship Meghan wants to present. Even when she called her husband 'a fox' she looked like she didn't believe it herself either (who could blame her, Harry is not a looker by any means).

Agree and the fact that his unhappiness doesn’t appear to trouble her at all is very telling .She is all about image . The reality behind closed doors I suspect is very different.

(who could blame her, Harry is not a looker by any means)

That struck me especially as she prefaced her comment about his looks with "in case you hadn't noticed...".
Amal Clooney, AFAIK, has never felt it necessary to point out that George is "very, very handsome" but, then, you couldn't fail to notice George Clooney's looks.

Meghan has a "you're dead to me" personality and Harry has a "why always me" complex. Both of the ideally need people in their lives who can talk them down but in reality they have managed to remove those who probably did this for them in the past. The worse combination is that they now bounce off each other. It was evident on the Netflix documentary and both search for confirmation bias to support their conflict, sausages and lip balm

Harry has been ungentlemanly enough to comment on their sex life,

When did he do this?

It could be because they always want to be the centre of attention when they attend an event that the invites have dried up as it detracts from the point of the event.

Interesting timeline now there is more discussion around Meghan and her obsession with Diana.

Harry recounts in Spare how Meghan flew to London to meet him on the day of the anniversary of the death of his late mother, Princess Diana.

The couple were nearly two months into their relationship, having been on their romantic trip to Botswana.

He reveals in the book how she texted him that she had made it into the UK while he was laying flowers on his mother's grave at Althorp with the Prince of Wales.

Harry drove back to London with William and met Meghan later that day.

He says in the book that she had told him to take a secret way to the hotel and a freight lift, where he met a friend of hers named Vanessa who led him to her hotel door.

Meghan soon opened the door, her arms reaching for Harry, he recalled.
'She pulled me inside and thanked her friend in one fluid motion, then slammed the door quickly before anyone saw,' he writes.

The royal reveals he and Meghan spent the night at one of the Soho House branches on the day of the anniversary of Princess Diana's death, and recalls waiting 'breathlessly' outside her room until she opened the door and 'pulled me inside'.

Hinting the passionate clinch that followed their reunion, he wrote: 'I want to say we hung a "Do Not Disturb" sign on the door. But I don't think there was time.'

That's a bit weird. Seems to conflate grief and mother with hot sex.

@Thedom Megyn Kelly the other day said that she has an acquaintance in common with Trevor Engelson, MM's first husband. TE told this person that MM had a "vision board" with Prince Harry on it.

The Vintage Read has speculated in a couple of her videos that MM met Harry a lot earlier than they claim, with some interesting evidence suggesting this. And also, that the campaign against Catherine by one of the prominent SS members started a couple of years before the H&M relationship became official.

Let's not forget MM's own words in the Tig about Catherine's wedding. The idea that she had no idea who Harry was until she met him is pretty unbelievable.

Pamela Anderson, whom MM has been copying in "With Love", was there. Still with no makeup on (another copy) and looking absolutely fantastic!

Also he was reported to have said something to friends which I don’t want to repeat here because it might be untrue and as much as I dislike her it’s not MM’s fault he blabbed. But it has been mentioned before on these threads.

@Ohpleeeease I know what you’re referring to but it never struck me as being true, probably because it was an awful thing for him to say, and I don’t want to believe he said it.

https://archive.ph/K7b2X

Thanks for that. Have to say I agree with Ms Callaghan’s analysis.

"..one fluid motion.." I've never read the book. Keep putting excerpts on here.

Ooooer, Missus

Ditto, @Weepixie.

The stuff he wrote in his book is from the horse’s mouth, other stories less certain, though out there.

What I did think is that she gambled successfully on him being the sort of man who is turned on by shall we say enthusiastic behaviour without being ultimately repelled by it. Because the hotel room story could have easily gone another way.