Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Harry's new interview

1000 replies

Viviennemary · 02/05/2025 17:49

Harry has just given an interview quite a long one. I only heard a snippet and i'm totally incensed. Harry has said he doesn't know how long Charles has left. Who says that on TV for the whole nation to hear. What is the matter with the man. He is an absolute disgrace.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
Fluffyholeysocks · 03/05/2025 11:38

I understand that H has written to the Home Secretary to review the body that authorises protection for the senior Royals. I sincerely hope no more money is wasted on this. I wonder if after a period of contemplation he will regret his interview. I'm sure he was feeling very disappointed and emotional - not the best time to give an interview.

IcedPurple · 03/05/2025 11:38

Can I just ask the posters complaining about this judgement something.

What exactly do you want to happen?

3 High Court judges have upheld the court's decision that RAVEC had acted appropriately. So legally Harry has no case. Do you want the High Court judgement to be overturned? If so, by whom and on what grounds? Please be specific.

miraxxx · 03/05/2025 11:40

I do not think fair at all to expect other states to pick up the security tab for these parasites as the Canadian government did for a while. That must surely be a consideration in the Ravec assessment. How embarassing for the UK to put much poorer nations at the mercy of these leeches.

PrettyFlyforaMaiTai · 03/05/2025 11:40

IcedPurple · 03/05/2025 11:38

Can I just ask the posters complaining about this judgement something.

What exactly do you want to happen?

3 High Court judges have upheld the court's decision that RAVEC had acted appropriately. So legally Harry has no case. Do you want the High Court judgement to be overturned? If so, by whom and on what grounds? Please be specific.

Harry and his stans clearly think that he is above the law and judgement. Says it all really, doesn’t it.

Hardcrustsfromnowon654 · 03/05/2025 11:40

Bontonbonbon · 03/05/2025 09:29

I love that posters are arguing that a 1,200 year old British institution should be ended because one spoilt prince and his wife can’t have their own way.

The level of ignorance and misinformation is astounding. And the fact that Harry is adding to all the bullshit lies just goes to show why he isn’t trusted to be part of that institution any more.

The crown and the state are inexorably linked. You cannot insist on merching and self promotion while representing your country in a diplomatic capacity.

What he is asking for us Trumpian levels of self centred, reputation damaging special treatment.

He and Trump and Prince Andrew are peas in pod. Entitled, self deluded man babies.

I was interested in Harry’s comments about the security issue being used as pressure to persuade him and M to stay within the RF.

Events such as this make me wonder, why does so much secrecy surround the Royal Family? Why do they draw the circle of wagons around themselves so tightly when one of their number decides to leave? And why is it that, whoever leaves, becomes subject to global vilification? It smacks of the entitled few protecting their privilege at all costs if you ask me.

If the monarchy was a more open, slimmed down, accountable institution, presumably they would have less to protect and hide?

I’m certain that many royalists on here will say these absconders brought it upon themselves. The bolsters can’t be trusted! i wonder though …

I don’t have as much reference for the 1,200 institution as you do Bontonbonbon as I feel there is far too much soft power, wealth and privilege embedded in one family which goes unacknowledged, they are not accountable for their actions, and are exempt from various laws relating to tax, inheritance and land ownership that the rest of the country have to abide by.

The wealth they have accrued from this special, protected status, is obscene and is in no way justified by the amount of work they do, or the loss of privacy they endure imho. I think we’ve all collectively jumped the shark and can’t see how the balance is now out of whack and the country is serving the RF, just as much as the royal family is serving us?

Nor do I buy that everyone who has removed themselves from the tight royal circle of privilege is entitled, and self deluded, whereas everyone inside is benign and squeaky clean. I think they are all pretty entitled and self deluded and as everyone points out, they all fall under the umbrella of palace PR before they leave, so what else is it hiding?

DodgersJammyAndOtherwise · 03/05/2025 11:41

SisterTeatime · 03/05/2025 09:17

Watching part of the interview I was struck by how good Harry’s media training must have been.

That he’s of well below average intelligence has become increasingly obvious, but he still presents like a person with gravitas and authority. It makes me reflect on the enduring power of class, education and ‘establishment’ in the UK, although not in the way he’d like me to.

Both Harry and Meghan are starting to come across as deranged. You can’t demand reality conform to your wishes. I dread to think what will happen as the money really starts to run out. I can’t blame KC for staying out of contact - what else can he realistically do?

Harry Enfield's Tim Nicebutdim was ahead of it's time, clearly.

I went to school with Diana's cousins and a lot of other very wealthy children besides and, for the most part, from a very young age, they develop a sort of gravitas that other kids don't have. A sort of confidence that probably comes from knowing there is a stack of money flopping about so no matter how badly they do in life, they will always have a roof or roofs over their heads.

I think this is what we are seeing in Harry. Totally unaware of how he comes across because he doesn't give the smallest shit.

miraxxx · 03/05/2025 11:41

IcedPurple · 03/05/2025 11:38

Can I just ask the posters complaining about this judgement something.

What exactly do you want to happen?

3 High Court judges have upheld the court's decision that RAVEC had acted appropriately. So legally Harry has no case. Do you want the High Court judgement to be overturned? If so, by whom and on what grounds? Please be specific.

They take their cue from Harry - he expects the King and the PM to bend the knee and illegally clear the way for him. The contempt for due process is clear.

CleansUpButWouldPreferNotTo · 03/05/2025 11:42

It's all about meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee! Once again, he shows his lack of understanding, no empathy. Just go away, Haweee

SuperTrooper14 · 03/05/2025 11:44

Really interesting to see that Harry's interview is buried on the landing page of People.com, their go-to news outlet for anonymous briefings. The comments on the story are savage too. Could it be even Americans are tiring of Harry's non-stop pity party?

KatherineParr · 03/05/2025 11:44

IcedPurple · 03/05/2025 11:38

Can I just ask the posters complaining about this judgement something.

What exactly do you want to happen?

3 High Court judges have upheld the court's decision that RAVEC had acted appropriately. So legally Harry has no case. Do you want the High Court judgement to be overturned? If so, by whom and on what grounds? Please be specific.

Harry supporters: The monarchy is a corrupt institution. Harry is a dragon slayer, fighting against injustice and unearned privilege.

Also Harry supporters: The King should overrule the judiciary and RAVEC.

Make it make sense.

IcedPurple · 03/05/2025 11:44

Hardcrustsfromnowon654 · 03/05/2025 11:40

I was interested in Harry’s comments about the security issue being used as pressure to persuade him and M to stay within the RF.

Events such as this make me wonder, why does so much secrecy surround the Royal Family? Why do they draw the circle of wagons around themselves so tightly when one of their number decides to leave? And why is it that, whoever leaves, becomes subject to global vilification? It smacks of the entitled few protecting their privilege at all costs if you ask me.

If the monarchy was a more open, slimmed down, accountable institution, presumably they would have less to protect and hide?

I’m certain that many royalists on here will say these absconders brought it upon themselves. The bolsters can’t be trusted! i wonder though …

I don’t have as much reference for the 1,200 institution as you do Bontonbonbon as I feel there is far too much soft power, wealth and privilege embedded in one family which goes unacknowledged, they are not accountable for their actions, and are exempt from various laws relating to tax, inheritance and land ownership that the rest of the country have to abide by.

The wealth they have accrued from this special, protected status, is obscene and is in no way justified by the amount of work they do, or the loss of privacy they endure imho. I think we’ve all collectively jumped the shark and can’t see how the balance is now out of whack and the country is serving the RF, just as much as the royal family is serving us?

Nor do I buy that everyone who has removed themselves from the tight royal circle of privilege is entitled, and self deluded, whereas everyone inside is benign and squeaky clean. I think they are all pretty entitled and self deluded and as everyone points out, they all fall under the umbrella of palace PR before they leave, so what else is it hiding?

I was interested in Harry’s comments about the security issue being used as pressure to persuade him and M to stay within the RF.

On the contrary, the senior royals seem to have said 'Well we'd like you to stay but if you've decided to leave, we wish you the best'.

And that is what has enraged Harry for the past 5 years.

Why do they draw the circle of wagons around themselves so tightly when one of their number decides to leave? And why is it that, whoever leaves, becomes subject to global vilification?

What do you mean?

The senior royals have barely uttered the names Harry and Meghan in public over the past 5 years.

Yet from 'the other side', we've had 'documentaries', interviews, podcasts, the lot.

The reality is that the royal family has moved on and managed fine without Harry and his wife. And this is what he cannot tolerate.

PrettyFlyforaMaiTai · 03/05/2025 11:44

miraxxx · 03/05/2025 11:41

They take their cue from Harry - he expects the King and the PM to bend the knee and illegally clear the way for him. The contempt for due process is clear.

Complain Good Morning GIF by South Park

And they support him emotionally blackmailing his family and having a toddler tantrum on national tv because he didn’t get his own way. Despite the fact that three qualified and highly esteemed judges thought that he had no case.

Dont forget the fact that William got a bigger bedroom and an extra sausage at breakfast 🤣

Waaagh indeed.

drivinmecrazy · 03/05/2025 11:46

I can’t wait for the verdict of the body language experts to give their analysis of the interview.

even through my eyes I could give one observation.
whenever he said anything remotely positive or neutral about the RF he would do a little sniff. Almost as if he had a bad smell under his nose.

also his eyes were wandering at times as if trying to remember the lines he had rehearsed.

fascinating. Endlessly fascinating.

IcedPurple · 03/05/2025 11:47

KatherineParr · 03/05/2025 11:44

Harry supporters: The monarchy is a corrupt institution. Harry is a dragon slayer, fighting against injustice and unearned privilege.

Also Harry supporters: The King should overrule the judiciary and RAVEC.

Make it make sense.

Yep.

We've had all the stuff about Harry being 'entitled' to lifelong security simply because he was 'born a prince'. Now the King is supposed to act like a medieval tyrant and overrule the courts of law on behalf of his spoiled son.

Good thing these people are all republicans. Imagine their arguments if they supported a monarchy!

PrettyFlyforaMaiTai · 03/05/2025 11:47

KatherineParr · 03/05/2025 11:44

Harry supporters: The monarchy is a corrupt institution. Harry is a dragon slayer, fighting against injustice and unearned privilege.

Also Harry supporters: The King should overrule the judiciary and RAVEC.

Make it make sense.

season 7 episode 23 GIF

Sussex stans:

The monarchy is irrelevant

but also

The King needs to intervene for his son and breach constitutional conventions and legal process to do so

MovingSwiftlyOn · 03/05/2025 11:48

Kanga’s story was a lot more than a previous poster implied.
a quick read of her Wikipedia entry showed her to have numerous health problems from birth alongside addiction issues. I think it is at the very least disingenuous to imply that her death was caused by her relationship with Charles

miraxxx · 03/05/2025 11:49

IcedPurple · 03/05/2025 11:47

Yep.

We've had all the stuff about Harry being 'entitled' to lifelong security simply because he was 'born a prince'. Now the King is supposed to act like a medieval tyrant and overrule the courts of law on behalf of his spoiled son.

Good thing these people are all republicans. Imagine their arguments if they supported a monarchy!

Being born a prince is a protected characteristic - quick add it to the Equality Act! Harry's argument is that he cannot discard his princehood and hence will always be endangered by it.

PrettyFlyforaMaiTai · 03/05/2025 11:52

miraxxx · 03/05/2025 11:49

Being born a prince is a protected characteristic - quick add it to the Equality Act! Harry's argument is that he cannot discard his princehood and hence will always be endangered by it.

Don’t give him ideas 🤣

Cherrysoup · 03/05/2025 11:53

Give that man an even bigger spade! Watching a snippet on the news, all I could think was that Charles should sneak a DNA test. I know, bad me.

Hardcrustsfromnowon654 · 03/05/2025 11:55

Too late to edit!

Bolters not bolsters! 😀🫣😃

miraxxx · 03/05/2025 11:55

I have never commented on the Harkles before, I lean republican but felt driven to say something after watching that interview. For the record, I beleive Harry's character flaws were always present (even his own mother might have noted them) but deliberately hidden by the courtiers and press until his marriage.

MayaKovskaya · 03/05/2025 11:55

PrettyFlyforaMaiTai · 03/05/2025 11:52

Don’t give him ideas 🤣

I think we all know how very Special he is! 😂

Grammarnut · 03/05/2025 11:56

TasWair · 02/05/2025 17:53

It really is not a shocking thing to say about an elderly man. The context is that Charles isn't talking to him, and that Harry wants to make amends because life is short.
I can't envisage any situation where I wouldn't talk to my children tbh, even if I didn't approve of the way they live or of their spouse. It must be absolutely awful for Harry that his father won't speak to him, but seems to have forgiven the horrific transgressions of his brother, Andrew.

It's a shocking thing to say about the Head of State of the UK and NI and 14 other realms and territories. That information is for the king to allow to be published, having taken the advice of the PM and courtiers and governments of other realms. It is for not his wayward son to casually discuss in public.
As for not talking to a child, presumably none of yours have published a memoir that trashes your DP or any of their brothers and sisters, and suggests that they only exist to be a tissue donor to an older brother?

Grammarnut · 03/05/2025 11:57

Cherrysoup · 03/05/2025 11:53

Give that man an even bigger spade! Watching a snippet on the news, all I could think was that Charles should sneak a DNA test. I know, bad me.

I think one was done - didn't Princess Diana say so. Can't remember the result but the aristocracy and monarchy are so closely entwined that Harry's looks are no guide here.

Ohyure · 03/05/2025 11:58

Why doesn’t that fool just shut up and go away?

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread