Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Harry's new interview

1000 replies

Viviennemary · 02/05/2025 17:49

Harry has just given an interview quite a long one. I only heard a snippet and i'm totally incensed. Harry has said he doesn't know how long Charles has left. Who says that on TV for the whole nation to hear. What is the matter with the man. He is an absolute disgrace.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
SuperTrooper14 · 03/05/2025 09:03

Because they'd get it anyway for any Royal-related visit, I've alway thought the crux of his case implied that they want to come to the UK to NOT see the family. Given they need to earn independently now but need their Royal connection still, I suspect that, privately, Harry is being driven by a need to return to the UK to maintain and further the Sussex brand with business opportunities and they can't do that with their current set-up. He spouts about 'history repeating' and 'the establishment cover-up' because he can't say 'we want to come over to broker Meg's jams getting stocked in Fortnum & Mason'.

I'm glad King Charles is holding firm about keeping his distance. The Queen might not have been the best hands-on mother but she did prepare her son to be King and has instilled in him the same determination to protect the constitution. Harry knows that and has always known that and his utter lack of respect for his father's position, evidenced again in this interview, is appalling.

Harry must be desperate though: he knows when Charles is dead and William is King, it's game over. He HAS to reconcile before that happens and he's cast out for good. But I doubt William will even invite him to his coronation.

EleanorReally · 03/05/2025 09:04

the wife always gets the blame,
posh,
yoko ono
and megan

Viviennemary · 03/05/2025 09:04

SoNotaRealHousewife · 03/05/2025 08:20

He will have security though

They can visit if adequate notice is given. It's Harry wanting his own way as usual. And if he doesn't get it he gives an interview listing his grievances.

OP posts:
Mylovelygreendress · 03/05/2025 09:05

needmoresheep · 03/05/2025 08:41

Spare 2 is on its way! He has legal bills to pay. He has a vastly inflated opinion of himself, his importance, his version of truth and his reconciliation path.

Will anyone believe anything he writes ?

LizzieSiddal · 03/05/2025 09:05

Actually I think the only way there would be a reconciliation is if Harry signed a confidentiality agreement with his family, with severe consequences if he broke it. I expect H would want a sweetener, so Charles would have to give him many millions of pounds a year.

But who would want a relationship with a son who you do not trust.

smilesy · 03/05/2025 09:05

BobbleHatsRule · 03/05/2025 08:58

The 'Royal household' (grey suited string pullers? KC or William?) were pissed at H&M not doing as instructed and taught them a lesson by lowering their security risk. H&M didn't respond to that manipulation in the way they expected and so security pulled even more. H&M upped and left.

He obviously feels that security was used to bring him into line and has chosen not to toe the line. His family have washed their hands of him.

The RF are pretty disgusting supporting a paedophile, exhalting an adulterer and being disingenuous in claiming cancer rather than the read truth of pre cancerous...to woo public sympathy. Pre cancerous is still terrifying so why she had to inflate it is beyond me. (Perhaps her husband and her stopping any pretence at 'work' would t sit so well?) The sycophantic public lap it up and so the RF trudged on exploiting the public...let them eat cake....

How is no longer using tax payers money and the scare resource of the Met Special Protection to give security to someone who no longer resides in the UK, and who has decided to give up what is effectively a job and seek to earn money elsewhere “teaching them a lesson”? What utter shite

DeffoNeedANameChange · 03/05/2025 09:07

LizzieSiddal · 03/05/2025 09:05

Actually I think the only way there would be a reconciliation is if Harry signed a confidentiality agreement with his family, with severe consequences if he broke it. I expect H would want a sweetener, so Charles would have to give him many millions of pounds a year.

But who would want a relationship with a son who you do not trust.

Edited

I would always want a relationship with my kids, even if I felt I couldn't trust them.

MyKingdomForACat · 03/05/2025 09:07

DeffoNeedANameChange · 03/05/2025 09:02

This is such a misogynistic trope, though. Evil witch destroys Prince Charming.

Of all the bad things that have happened in Harry's life, I don't think that marrying Meghan is the worst. I think she's given him permission to drop that cheeky chappy persona that we all loved, but I think was always a mask.

His new approach hasn't won him any fans (!) but I do hope it might in some way bring him some genuine inner peace. I hope they are happy together, and that we only get to see the worst bits (ie the funerals and court cases). And I hope he has an actual qualified counsellor, not just TV interviewers.

Im saying he’s an idiot who didn’t listen to advice. If the majority of the family don’t like someone they can’t all be wrong

needmoresheep · 03/05/2025 09:08

And Harry knows when William becomes King then he becomes more irrelevant in the public eye. The public will focus on the next generation. He has no relationship with his niece and nephews.

Janiie · 03/05/2025 09:08

'His new approach hasn't won him any fans (!) but I do hope it might in some way bring him some genuine inner peace'

He is a man full of bitterness and resentment, sadly he will never find genuine inner peace until he develops some self awareness.

His latest gossipy interview continues to fuel his bile filled fire.

LizzieSiddal · 03/05/2025 09:09

DeffoNeedANameChange · 03/05/2025 09:07

I would always want a relationship with my kids, even if I felt I couldn't trust them.

But what iif you knew that when you spoke to your child, everything you said would be on the front page of every newspaper the next day?

TiredCatLady · 03/05/2025 09:09

Far from a royalist but to quote the Thick Of It:

He's so dense, light bends around him.

It should be clear by now that the loveable, cheeky, down-to-Earth Harry presented to the public was a manufactured image to cover up an arrogant, vain, entitled and frankly, monumentally thick man child. He seems to have a lot in common with his deadbeat uncle.

In the current climate, a spoiled rich boy living in a multi million dollar mansion, moaning to the BBC about not getting full time taxpayer funded security, while we have people living in tents and choosing between heating and eating is mind bogglingly ignorant.

Like others, I do wonder how much of this is driven by their financial situation. Their lifestyle, the house, staff, private jets etc besides what appears to be near constant legal spats - they must have burned through a lot of Harry’s funds. Meghan certainly had her own money but not £50k Cartier necklace levels.

Like his uncle, somehow I see him living out his days in one of the lodges, a divorced, bitter failure of a man who still thinks it’s all everyone else’s fault.

NautilusLionfish · 03/05/2025 09:09

He has reworking since he was five. The royal family and uk government have to he charged with historical child labour offences.😎 And can we add his mother posthumously. Perhaps her estate as codependent?

quietlysad · 03/05/2025 09:10

Maddy70 · 02/05/2025 18:00

Eh. Charles is an elderly man. An entirely understandable thing to say about someone of that age

It is absolutely not an okay thing to say about someone who has cancer!

BunnyLake · 03/05/2025 09:11

DeffoNeedANameChange · 03/05/2025 09:07

I would always want a relationship with my kids, even if I felt I couldn't trust them.

Once William is King there won’t be any parental guilt or parental expectations.

upinaballoon · 03/05/2025 09:11

MargaretThursday · 03/05/2025 08:47

It's not just a repugnant statement, it's also clearly rubbish to anyone who was around at the time of Diana's death.

In Diana's last few years of her life she was pretty disliked. Her face sold papers - but people were after the nasty gossip rather than because they adored her. Look at the headlines that had to be pulled on the day she died.
People had sympathy for the RF because of her behaviour and didn't want to see her back. But they loved the gossip of her latest "disgraceful actions".
Her death changed public opinion into suddenly she was a martyr, beloved by all, the People's Princess and the RF were all to blame. Stirred up by Tony Blair who saw an opportunity to place himself at the front as her knight in shining armour (never had done before) and the press who I suspect were feeling guilty and vulnerable.

If she'd lived, her face would probably still sell papers, but she wouldn't have been loved.
I was helping lead a group of teens and I remember one saying "it seems such an ordinary way for her to go." And I think that was part of it. It brought home that if she could die in an accident, so could anyone else.

So the last thing the RF would want is for her son to be martyred in the same way, because currently, in this county, judging by comments in papers, approval rating, things people say offhand, people have sympathy with the RF and think he's being a prat.
They know from Diana, that could easily be flipped on its head if he died in an accident.

What the RF would probably like more than anything is for him to go back to his home. Keep quiet except when he's doing something sensible or sending a polite, not loaded birthday greetings etc. And then, without announcing it to everyone, reach out with an apology. I suspect then they would equally quietly be prepared to start rebuilding a very careful relationship until they were sure he wasn't going note down, twist it and inform the press.
It would take years to repair the relationship, but that way they could get back to some sort of speaking terms.

I've been in the situation where two people felt able to publicly say lies about me, either twisted versions of reality or sometimes completely made up from nothing. The only way I could protect my mental health was by completely blocking them, because otherwise every interaction you are wondering what they're going to make out of that. I get a strong physical reaction to even seeing their names.
If you've not been in that situation you may not be able to understand how it can become necessary to completely block someone.

Good post. Interesting.

In my experience it's gently does it with a family rift. Let dust settle for a while and then have an occasion where both can be at same table, same room - not unlike W and H being at the unveiling of Diana's statue.

He falls for the journalists every ploy, or else he just loves the next spotlight.

I hope members of the RF, and I include Harry and Meghan in this, send private birthday and Christmas messages to one another, but I'm not sure that they do.

wrinklyoldarms · 03/05/2025 09:12

@BobbleHatsRule I'm loathe to get into this argument over what Catherine has/ had but you've got the wrong end of the stick.

She didn't have 'pre-cancer' - she had cancer. This was in her interview. 'Cancer was found'.

She had surgery and whatever was removed was found to have cancer in it.
She was given chemo to prevent something that was possibly Stage 1 or 2 (localised) becoming Stage 3 and 4 (spread to other organs.)

How you misunderstood is unclear.

SL2924 · 03/05/2025 09:12

If my life was at risk ever and my parents had any means or say in reducing that risk they would do it in a heartbeat. As would I for my children. No question and no matter of fall outs. Blows my mind that anyone could care so little about their own children. Charles is so privileged and clearly so bitter. What a family. Harry is pretty cringe and clearly lost but hardly surprising when you look at how his father treats him.

Blueskiesandrainbows · 03/05/2025 09:13

I think @LizzieSiddal hits the nail on the head there, there is no trust, and when trust is broken the relationship is broken. It’s only when trust can be renewed by both parties that a relationship can progress. Harry has proved that he cannot be trusted to keep confidential private conversations to himself therefore how can the King continue to converse with him, knowing that Harry just cannot understand that a private conversation is exactly that.

Harry needs to accept he’s made his bed in America and now he has to lie in it and work for a living by finding a useful occupation, not just thinking he can live off slagging off his family at every available opportunity, and then whining that nobody speaks to be him.

They are not royals any more they gave up that right when they left this country they are just sponging off the title, they are just an ordinary couple and it’s time they grew up and realised that.

SuperTrooper14 · 03/05/2025 09:14

quietlysad · 03/05/2025 09:10

It is absolutely not an okay thing to say about someone who has cancer!

Agree. It's really not okay, especially just one day after the King had revealed in a statement to cancer patients just how difficult he's found it living with his illness, saying it's been daunting and frightening. To have his son publicly speculate on when he might die must be so hurtful.

Serenster · 03/05/2025 09:14

If my life was at risk every and my parents had any means or say in reducing that risk they would do it in a heartbeat.

And we know that they did use the means they had. But the decision is not theirs to make, and their offer to pay was rejected. And they had faced this before in 2011 when other family members had their security removed or downgraded.

needmoresheep · 03/05/2025 09:16

Mylovelygreendress · 03/05/2025 09:05

Will anyone believe anything he writes ?

It will be in the fiction department.

A Spare’s Adventures in California

A Spare escapes from the castle

A Spare’s close shave in New York

A Spare wannabe royal tour of Colombia (this will be followed by other countries)

A Spare goes flying

A Spare learns to make jam

A Spare discovers the truth

etc bit like Enid Blyton / Mr Men cross so lots of pictures but not too many words. Whimsical delusions

sualipa · 03/05/2025 09:16

Mylovelygreendress · 03/05/2025 09:02

Agree .
And all those saying he ( eventually) offered to pay for his own armed protection, apart from the fact that Met Police cannot be bought , what are they supposed to do the rest of their time ? Sit around in case the Sussexes decide to pop over ?
Clearly he wants IPP status which he isn’t going to get!

https://archive.ph/kNprW

Liz Jones... very true - ignore this at your peril.

I think this extraordinary, history-making interview is up there with the radio broadcast by Edward, renouncing the throne for Wallis Simpson. But, this time, Harry is clearly declaring his undying love for the Crown.
I believe that his wife Meghan has, with her Netflix show, her peddling of wares, her podcasts talking about her 'busyness' as a ‘Mom’, suddenly thrown his life into sharp relief.

It’s all too shallow, too sunny for him, standing on the sidelines like a waiter, cooing over a brunch party. He wants his life to really matter, as his mother’s did.
You can see the regret etched into his features, and the sorrow. If Charles and William do not reach out to him after this, then they will seem petty and vindictive. And, I believe, the British public won’t look kindly upon them.

I feel for Harry, I really do. His attempt in court to reinstate his official security in the UK, even pay for it himself, was an olive branch. But now I feel he is done fighting. He looks broken.
If the late Queen were still alive, she would be the bigger person and embrace him, her grandson. He is blood, he is family. Charles and William: reconcile with Harry, or I fear the British people will turn against you.

BunnyLake · 03/05/2025 09:16

TiredCatLady · 03/05/2025 09:09

Far from a royalist but to quote the Thick Of It:

He's so dense, light bends around him.

It should be clear by now that the loveable, cheeky, down-to-Earth Harry presented to the public was a manufactured image to cover up an arrogant, vain, entitled and frankly, monumentally thick man child. He seems to have a lot in common with his deadbeat uncle.

In the current climate, a spoiled rich boy living in a multi million dollar mansion, moaning to the BBC about not getting full time taxpayer funded security, while we have people living in tents and choosing between heating and eating is mind bogglingly ignorant.

Like others, I do wonder how much of this is driven by their financial situation. Their lifestyle, the house, staff, private jets etc besides what appears to be near constant legal spats - they must have burned through a lot of Harry’s funds. Meghan certainly had her own money but not £50k Cartier necklace levels.

Like his uncle, somehow I see him living out his days in one of the lodges, a divorced, bitter failure of a man who still thinks it’s all everyone else’s fault.

He’ll give off Filch from Harry Potter vibes. Shuffling hunch backed and straggly haired (what’s left of it) sweeping leaves from his front path, muttering to himself about how badly done by he’s been. Meanwhile Meghan will be on marriage number five, having finally bagged her billionaire and loving life.

RingForMiddleFinger · 03/05/2025 09:16

sualipa · 03/05/2025 08:08

On the contrary we want bread and circuses and if we can't have bread then this is one hell of a circus. Send in the clowns.

Send in the clowns.

They already did

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.