Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Harry and RAVEC #2

1000 replies

Baital · 18/04/2025 15:37

To continue...

OP posts:
Thread gallery
17
MrsLeonFarrell · 02/05/2025 17:35

Serenster · 02/05/2025 17:29

(This is a good example of not talking publicly when you are angry…)

This is a great summary of the whole interview

PoppysAunt · 02/05/2025 17:36

Vespanest · 02/05/2025 17:34

Harry is generational wealth broke, he can't afford a life of security

Please tell me he'll release "Spare 2"? The last one was hilarious 🤣

RandyRedHumpback · 02/05/2025 17:36

Bloody interviewer is on now pleading his case on his behalf! No critical thinking whatsoever! Finds him moving and clearly believes everything the idiot says without questioning any of it!

IcedPurple · 02/05/2025 17:36

RandyRedHumpback · 02/05/2025 17:35

The interviewer was poor. They really needed a Brit or at least someone who understands the workings of the system.

Yes, terrible interviewer, though I guess he wouldn't sit for any real journalist.

She's on now and fawning over him again, although she's not informed as to the facts.

IdaGlossop · 02/05/2025 17:36

Serenster · 02/05/2025 17:32

“My father will tell me it is a government decision. It may well be a government decision. But how did they reach that decision. The first thing they did was go to the Royal household. What did they want for me? I’ve never been allowed to make my own submissions”

So now he wants RAVEC to change their operating procedures to allow him to make his own submission when no-one else does (I presume), at the same time as complaining that RAVEC used a bespoke process for his case and that was unfair.

Serenster · 02/05/2025 17:37

He’s also more or less saying there’s a conflict of interest in the fact that there are people from the Royal Household on the RAVEC committee.

IcedPurple · 02/05/2025 17:38

RandyRedHumpback · 02/05/2025 17:36

Bloody interviewer is on now pleading his case on his behalf! No critical thinking whatsoever! Finds him moving and clearly believes everything the idiot says without questioning any of it!

Why isn't the BBC guy challenging her? Why isn't he saying that Harry does have security when he visits Britain provided he cooperates with the authorities?

viques · 02/05/2025 17:38

SnoozingFox · 02/05/2025 17:32

Meghan better get making some more jam. Sorry, raspberry flavoured spread.

Nah! Jam doesn’t hack it. She will be negotiating monetising the childrens faces. £1.5 million for one, but £5 m for the set!

Serenster · 02/05/2025 17:38

Keir Starmer will I imagine be utterly thrilled at being drawn into the middle of this 🤣

Kinneddar · 02/05/2025 17:38

He's just a permanent victim

He's forgiven his family? Can't understand why Charles won't talk to him?

Because Harry you dimwit you're the least discrete person around. You can't help playing the victim and running to the press. No wonder his family aren't interested

MrsLeonFarrell · 02/05/2025 17:38

He genuinely seems to think that because a retired politician gets security he should too. He also hasn't grasped what IPP is. He seems to think it comes with being born royal, has he never looked around at his family?

tartyflette · 02/05/2025 17:39

I hold no brief for the Sussexes but I do recall the Met Chief Constable saying shortly after this blew up and they had left that he had seen credible threats to MM's life.
So Harry probably saw them too, it was probably very frightening for him.

It only takes one nutter... (like the one who tried to kidnap Princess Anne in the 70s. Her personal detective fought the man off and was shot and injured in the attempt.)

MrsLeonFarrell · 02/05/2025 17:39

IcedPurple · 02/05/2025 17:29

"Every single day"?

So is he saying that the British taxpayer should be funding his security in California?

It sounds like it.

I didn't think of that but yes, he wants IPP status.

PoppysAunt · 02/05/2025 17:39

Serenster · 02/05/2025 17:38

Keir Starmer will I imagine be utterly thrilled at being drawn into the middle of this 🤣

😂😂he'll certainly be upping his security.

Cynic17 · 02/05/2025 17:39

Serenster · 02/05/2025 17:24

“I believe I am still continuing to serve the public”

How, FFS?!

Serenster · 02/05/2025 17:39

MrsLeonFarrell · 02/05/2025 17:38

He genuinely seems to think that because a retired politician gets security he should too. He also hasn't grasped what IPP is. He seems to think it comes with being born royal, has he never looked around at his family?

Exactly this. And not all politicians either - just ones that have held the highest offices. So not the brother not in the direct line of succession….

IcedPurple · 02/05/2025 17:40

Why is this fool of a 'journalist' saying that the King 'doesn't want to get involved with government procedures'?

It's not a case of 'doesn't want'. It's not allowed. Does she have the first clue about Constitutional Monarchy?

JSMill · 02/05/2025 17:40

Serenster · 02/05/2025 17:24

“I believe I am still continuing to serve the public”

🤣🤣🤣

BunnyLake · 02/05/2025 17:40

IdaGlossop · 18/04/2025 16:15

Harry really ought to stop encouraging his friends to be his mouthpiece with the Daily Mail. They seem to be as dim as him. After the comments about the Chair of Sentebale being upset and not not being the most important black woman on the stage, today we have these two gems (my disproving evidence in brackets):

'He (H) hasn't got a nasty bone in his body.' (Errr....multiple attacks on his family, the Royal family and the UK since 2021, the rumours of his treatment of a polo horse and of women in Africa with whom he had 'close dealings')

'He tends to come in and out of the country under guise.' (Funny that the press were gathered outside the Court of Appeal last week to pap H when he didn't need to be in court)

Link if you can bear it: https://archive.ph/YWpgk

He doesn’t have a nasty bone in his body because he’s completely spineless and the rest of him is made up of sap.

PoppysAunt · 02/05/2025 17:40

tartyflette · 02/05/2025 17:39

I hold no brief for the Sussexes but I do recall the Met Chief Constable saying shortly after this blew up and they had left that he had seen credible threats to MM's life.
So Harry probably saw them too, it was probably very frightening for him.

It only takes one nutter... (like the one who tried to kidnap Princess Anne in the 70s. Her personal detective fought the man off and was shot and injured in the attempt.)

There are credible threats against all of them. Harry is not unique.
He gets security, paid for by the taxpayer.

RandyRedHumpback · 02/05/2025 17:40

IcedPurple · 02/05/2025 17:38

Why isn't the BBC guy challenging her? Why isn't he saying that Harry does have security when he visits Britain provided he cooperates with the authorities?

Edited

Because it's the fucking BBC! He's not going to challenge his colleague's "coup" of an interview. And they love a self declared victim of the establishment and racist, right wing tabloids!

MrsLeonFarrell · 02/05/2025 17:40

tartyflette · 02/05/2025 17:39

I hold no brief for the Sussexes but I do recall the Met Chief Constable saying shortly after this blew up and they had left that he had seen credible threats to MM's life.
So Harry probably saw them too, it was probably very frightening for him.

It only takes one nutter... (like the one who tried to kidnap Princess Anne in the 70s. Her personal detective fought the man off and was shot and injured in the attempt.)

There have definitely been credible threats. No one is saying there aren't. The threats are why he is given security when he visits. But quoting a threat from 5 years ago gives no information about the current that level, and none of us know what it is we can only trust that RAVEC know what they are doing.

drivinmecrazy · 02/05/2025 17:41

thank you Harry !
just finished my first week of radiotherapy and was feeling quite down and beaten.

Now I’m laughing my head off at the sheer comedy of it all.

Keep it coming Harry!

Puzzledandpissedoff · 02/05/2025 17:41

Well, that's any iota that might have remained of his credibility straight down the drain

Predictable, tedious and sad - god alone knows what the family will have made of it

MrsLeonFarrell · 02/05/2025 17:41

viques · 02/05/2025 17:34

I would say the duty of care belongs firmly to the two adult people who have chosen to leave a place where they were protected, where they could have stepped back from an official role, led a happy family life bringing up their kids AND have been offered excellent protection. Instead they chose to to leave, to publish inflammatory statements about their military career and statements about their family and yet still can’t see how their actions have led to this situation.

I agree but Harry doesn't

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread