Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Harry and RAVEC - claims he was trapped by RF

1000 replies

smilesy · 11/04/2025 19:04

Okay. So first of all thanks to everyone on the last thread for a really civilised discussion about Harry and his security. The Telegraph has an exclusive article where Harry claims that his security was removed to “trap” him in the RF. I’m really sorry but for some reason I am unable to archive Telegraph articles at the moment. Could anyone help?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
25
HonoriaBulstrode · 12/04/2025 22:56

So you are interested in him shining a light on how ravec works?

No, I'd rather the security services were left to get on with their job and not have to waste their time and our money on distractions like this.

She's doing a sterling job as Queen too.

Yes indeed. I have a lot of respect for Camilla.

TheNeedyKhakiPanda · 12/04/2025 22:56

wigsonthegreenandhatsforthelifting · 12/04/2025 22:52

Some people are just nuts!

Yep, they are saying that they want Prince Harry and his family to die, it was actually quite disgusting to read, I don't like Harry or Meghan, I don't want anything to happen to them, I do think the arrangements are correct so I don't think anything will, but it's scary to see so many people believing his narative.

Mylovelygreendress · 12/04/2025 22:59

@BasiliskStare ”How much more does Harry expect? “

He expects to be treated exactly the same as William . This whole situation is about his jealousy of his older brother.,

Mylovelygreendress · 12/04/2025 23:01

Galaxybisc · 12/04/2025 22:54

Camilla didn’t have it worse that’s total nonsense. She got bad press because she was actually doing something wrong.

Clearly you weren’t around in the 1990s !

wigsonthegreenandhatsforthelifting · 12/04/2025 23:05

Galaxybisc · 12/04/2025 22:54

Camilla didn’t have it worse that’s total nonsense. She got bad press because she was actually doing something wrong.

OMFG the abuse that woman got was off the scale!! She was totally villified especially by the Diana fans. She was the devil incarnate. She shouldered most of the blame, not Charles.

If Camilla was doing something wrong, so was Charles, so was Diana. Camilla was the scapegoat. I don't know how the poor woman put her head out of the door sometimes. And she hadn't done anything the other two hadn't.

Lunde · 12/04/2025 23:08

BigWillyLittleTodger · 12/04/2025 18:15

I agree with this, and I am concerned that Charles would try and influence this case to give “darling boy” what he demands, like you say, who would know? It wouldn’t surprise me if Charles felt so devastated and brow beaten by Harry that he will intervene in some way to try to give him what he wants, the Queen expressed her wishes on Harry’s security so Harry is expecting even more from Charles, hence the toddler tantrum. Hopefully even if Charles does try he will get the same answer as the Queen.

You see I don't really see that.

I think that Charles is a lot of soft "darling boy" words on the surface but pretty ruthless underneath. I would have been easy for Charles to quietly pay H&M's unpaid rent at Frogmore and let them keep a base at Windsor - but he didn't - he evicted them.

I think Charles is also probably pretty upset that H&M marred the final years of his parents' lives in their greed to make money out of selling the family. But I doubt that any of the RF will go on the record because it just gives them oxygen to play to the US

I don't doubt that there is some regret from Charles about the estrangement - but the trust is gone. The RF don't want to be in the same room as they know that whatever they say will be sold for content by the petulant pair.

BigAnne · 12/04/2025 23:08

Starseeking · 12/04/2025 22:50

He was mollycoddled firstly by his Mum, then by his whole family once she died. I think he genuinely thought none of his family would have the balls to stand back and let it all happen this time, and his rage/fightback is in response to that.

From his perspective, his mind is probably completely blown by the “change” in his family, and as a previous poster mentioned, his behaviour since indicates he is not mentally well.

He was packed off to boarding school so not mollycoddled. Both parents rarely saw their boys , which is common in aristocrat families. No wonder they're all so fucked up in the head.

Mylovelygreendress · 12/04/2025 23:11

W and C seem to be much more hands on and down to earth with their DC .

AuroraCake · 12/04/2025 23:12

Lunde · 12/04/2025 23:08

You see I don't really see that.

I think that Charles is a lot of soft "darling boy" words on the surface but pretty ruthless underneath. I would have been easy for Charles to quietly pay H&M's unpaid rent at Frogmore and let them keep a base at Windsor - but he didn't - he evicted them.

I think Charles is also probably pretty upset that H&M marred the final years of his parents' lives in their greed to make money out of selling the family. But I doubt that any of the RF will go on the record because it just gives them oxygen to play to the US

I don't doubt that there is some regret from Charles about the estrangement - but the trust is gone. The RF don't want to be in the same room as they know that whatever they say will be sold for content by the petulant pair.

I think Charles is quite steely to be honest. A steel core.

AuroraCake · 12/04/2025 23:13

wigsonthegreenandhatsforthelifting · 12/04/2025 23:05

OMFG the abuse that woman got was off the scale!! She was totally villified especially by the Diana fans. She was the devil incarnate. She shouldered most of the blame, not Charles.

If Camilla was doing something wrong, so was Charles, so was Diana. Camilla was the scapegoat. I don't know how the poor woman put her head out of the door sometimes. And she hadn't done anything the other two hadn't.

so much talk about the patriarchy but I often thinks it’s more about the matriarchy. No one keeps, and kicks, women down than other women.

Lunde · 12/04/2025 23:15

HonoriaBulstrode · 12/04/2025 18:48

She was costing Charles a fortune on couture design fgs let alone all the rest!

There was the wedding reception which he paid for, which went way over budget. Scobie said so in Finding Freedom, so that's not lies put about by the haterz.

I don't believe Charles would act unconstitutionally, but if he is upset by the whole situation, I think this is where Camilla would have a calming influence. No doubt to be spun by Harry as Evil Stepmother Turning Pa Against Me.

Meghan spen an absolute fortune the year she got married an left Charles to pick up the bill - 4½ times any other Royal in Europe

Which European royals spent the most on new clothes in 2018?

  1. Meghan, Duchess of Sussex: £406,662.55 ($508,258.25)
  2. Crown Princess Mary of Denmark: £88,999.57 ($112,831.96)
  3. Sophie, Countess of Wessex: £73,570.41 ($93,271.17)
  4. Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge: £68,334.23 ($86,632.84)
  5. Crown Princess Mette-Marit of Norway: £52,307.18 ($66,314.05)
  6. Princess Charlene of Monaco: £52,199.00 ($66,176.90)
  7. Queen Máxima of Netherlands: £48,338.20 ($61,282.25)
  8. Princess Beatrice of York: £47,859.10 ($60,674.86)
  9. Princess Marie of Denmark: £43,650.54 ($55,339.33)
10. Crown Princess Victoria of Sweden: £37,365.96 ($47,371.85) 11. Queen Letizia of Spain: £36,075.78 ($45,736.19) 12. Princess Eugenie of York: £31,860.80 ($40,392.52) 13. Princess Sofia of Sweden: £26,452.73 ($33,536.27) 14. Princess Madeleine of Sweden: £22,806.53 ($28,913.69)

www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-6554329/Meghan-Markle-spent-wardrobe-2018-royals.html

BigWillyLittleTodger · 12/04/2025 23:15

Lunde · 12/04/2025 23:08

You see I don't really see that.

I think that Charles is a lot of soft "darling boy" words on the surface but pretty ruthless underneath. I would have been easy for Charles to quietly pay H&M's unpaid rent at Frogmore and let them keep a base at Windsor - but he didn't - he evicted them.

I think Charles is also probably pretty upset that H&M marred the final years of his parents' lives in their greed to make money out of selling the family. But I doubt that any of the RF will go on the record because it just gives them oxygen to play to the US

I don't doubt that there is some regret from Charles about the estrangement - but the trust is gone. The RF don't want to be in the same room as they know that whatever they say will be sold for content by the petulant pair.

That’s an interesting perspective, maybe Charles is made of sterner stuff than I give him credit for.

Lunde · 12/04/2025 23:16

BruFord · 12/04/2025 19:21

I honestly don’t believe that they need round-the-clock security in Montecito anyway. Who’s going to try and get to them there? I live in the US and they’re not massive household names here tbh.

If anyone in that area were targeted, surely it would be someone really famous here like Oprah, Gwyneth Paltrow, etc.

I'm pretty sure they live in a gated community

IdaGlossop · 12/04/2025 23:22

Galaxybisc · 12/04/2025 22:54

Camilla didn’t have it worse that’s total nonsense. She got bad press because she was actually doing something wrong.

This doesn't hold up as an argument. Kate Middleton got bad press and didn't do anything wrong. Camilla had it worse because she was followed by journalists and photographers for 20 odd years, there were times when she was unable to leave her own house, she was called a horse. Charles did the same thing wrong and was not pursued as Camilla was. She bore the brunt of their adultery.

BasiliskStare · 12/04/2025 23:27

@IdaGlossop - Thank you for that post about vexatious litigants . H didn't eg need it seems to me to have done his recent case against the press - he could have continued with Hugh Grant etc but wanted his day in court and an apology for his mother. Now I don't really care in the sense that if this is between H or Rupert Murdoch or the like spending their own money , well it doesn't affect me. Except H does seem to think he can use court time for his own grievances. If it were up to me I would put him in the vexatious litigant category. The courts are not there as Harry's playground. I wonder if after this case it will be discussed or whether he is way off the threshold 😊

Lunde · 12/04/2025 23:31

Uricon2 · 12/04/2025 20:01

From what I can glean they paid for their own for at least most of the time after they went to France. Presumably as Govenor of the Bahamas his time there would have been state funded

Edward did a bit of a number on George VI, salting away Duchy of Cornwall money and not declaring that he had it, making sure he got a bigger payout. He also put George in the position of having to buy Balmoral and Sandringham off him to keep them in the family.

The motorcade in NYC last night was just bleurgh and performance. I think it was partly backing up Harry's claims (somehow) and partly a show of importance.

Yes - Edward and Wallace forced George VI to purchase Sandringham and Balmoral from him.

There were also some issues when he was Governor of the Bahamas - Edward and Wallace massively overspent renovating the house at a time when Britain had rationing - I think Churchill refused to pay

HonoriaBulstrode · 12/04/2025 23:34

I think that Charles is a lot of soft "darling boy" words on the surface but pretty ruthless underneath.

Harry reportedly once said that he wouldn't see Charles if Camilla was in the room. Charles might forgive a lot, but not that. And who does Harry think he is anyway, to dictate what the King and Queen do in their own home?

Starseeking · 12/04/2025 23:34

Galaxybisc · 12/04/2025 22:54

Camilla didn’t have it worse that’s total nonsense. She got bad press because she was actually doing something wrong.

You must have forgotten that she used to get tomatoes thrown at her in Waitrose!?!

Starseeking · 12/04/2025 23:42

HonoriaBulstrode · 12/04/2025 23:34

I think that Charles is a lot of soft "darling boy" words on the surface but pretty ruthless underneath.

Harry reportedly once said that he wouldn't see Charles if Camilla was in the room. Charles might forgive a lot, but not that. And who does Harry think he is anyway, to dictate what the King and Queen do in their own home?

Camilla is Charles’ non-negotiable, that much is clear. Even Diana couldn’t dislodge her. A few years ago I recall reading that Charles had quietly set up trusts for Canilla’s DC and/or DGC for them to inherit.

Harry is treading on very thin ice when it comes to Camilla; he’s already badmouthed her in Spare, if he tries it again, I’d put a bet on that Charles would side with Camilla over Harry.

IdaGlossop · 12/04/2025 23:44

HonoriaBulstrode · 12/04/2025 23:34

I think that Charles is a lot of soft "darling boy" words on the surface but pretty ruthless underneath.

Harry reportedly once said that he wouldn't see Charles if Camilla was in the room. Charles might forgive a lot, but not that. And who does Harry think he is anyway, to dictate what the King and Queen do in their own home?

Harry is foolish not to see that Charles is utterly devoted to Camilla and won't have a word said against her. It's something he ought to recognise as the dynamic in his own relationship is not altogether dissimilar. Fortunately, C&C bring out the best in one another whereas H & M amplify one another's destructive qualities.

wigsonthegreenandhatsforthelifting · 12/04/2025 23:46

Mylovelygreendress · 12/04/2025 23:11

W and C seem to be much more hands on and down to earth with their DC .

Yet they constantly are criticised when they spend time with their children when they are on holiday from school!

I'd have spent every holiday with my kids if I had had the leave!

wigsonthegreenandhatsforthelifting · 12/04/2025 23:51

BigWillyLittleTodger · 12/04/2025 23:15

That’s an interesting perspective, maybe Charles is made of sterner stuff than I give him credit for.

I hope so.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread