Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Sentebale #4

1000 replies

glitterturd · 01/04/2025 15:41

Harry

Sentebale #4
OP posts:
Thread gallery
35
Profhilodisaster · 03/04/2025 08:33

Have some of you even bothered to read all the issues with the woman heading Sentabale

Have you seen all the incorrect edits make on Dr Sophie's Wikipedia page ?

CorrectionCentre · 03/04/2025 08:40

CorrectionCentre · 03/04/2025 08:17

The financial management and governance of the charity will be investigated by the charities commission.

What I'm struggling with, is why this wasn't the route taken by the trustees if, as you claim, there was evidence of malpractice by SC. And if you have examples of malpractice I for one would be really interested to read them.

Mass resignation, thereby leaving the charity wholly in the hands of SC is an extraordinary route if their motivation was safeguarding the charity from a chair who they had evidence of committing financial wrongdoing . It smacks more of a clash of personalities and disagreement in the direction of policies and practices.

What SC has done, is give specific examples of how she was treated by the trustees and PH. I haven't seen specific examples of any malpractice put forward by them.

And to add, instead of putting forward examples of malpractice, the evidence coming from the side of the trustees and PH actually supports her claims of racism and misogyny within the board of trustees and PH

And to be clear, I wasn't suggesting that racism and misogyny are "personality clashes'!

Ohpleeeease · 03/04/2025 08:45

CorrectionCentre · 03/04/2025 08:17

The financial management and governance of the charity will be investigated by the charities commission.

What I'm struggling with, is why this wasn't the route taken by the trustees if, as you claim, there was evidence of malpractice by SC. And if you have examples of malpractice I for one would be really interested to read them.

Mass resignation, thereby leaving the charity wholly in the hands of SC is an extraordinary route if their motivation was safeguarding the charity from a chair who they had evidence of committing financial wrongdoing . It smacks more of a clash of personalities and disagreement in the direction of policies and practices.

What SC has done, is give specific examples of how she was treated by the trustees and PH. I haven't seen specific examples of any malpractice put forward by them.

I would add to this that the Charity Commission has specific regulatory powers it can invoke, up to and including a statutory inquiry. They can remove, disqualify and appoint trustees, freeze accounts and appoint administrators.

However, they won’t do any of this on the basis of unsubstantiated allegations. They also won’t (I would hope) engage with Harry, however hard he stamps his foot, because he has no governance role.

And the departing trustees may face more questions than they feel comfortable with about their conduct leading up to this mess.

JADS · 03/04/2025 08:48

MrsLeonFarrell · 03/04/2025 08:17

They definitely being out the worst in each other. I don't think Meghan is innocent in all this, she clearly bullies people going by the multiple reports of similar behaviour in many contexts. I just believe that Harry avoids a lot of blame that should be placed squarely in his shoulders. I do have sympathy for Meghan, but it is limited and the longer she goes on having problems with Co workers the more limited it gets.

Agree.

Harry was described as mischievous and having a good heart on this thread. Wtf.

Harry has never issued a heart felt apology for his previous racism. I'm not holding my breath here.

Mylovelygreendress · 03/04/2025 08:51

JADS · 03/04/2025 08:12

"The woman" as you so charmingly call her has a name, Sophie Chaudauka.

What is it with Sussex fans calling her that woman/lady/anything but her actual name? It comes across as really dismissive and degrading.

It’s copying Meghan’s style. Referring to the late Queen as “ your grandmother “ William as “ your brother “ the POW as Kate .
It’s a way of making these people inferior whilst insisting on your own title being used.

MissRoseDurward · 03/04/2025 09:40

It’s copying Meghan’s style. Referring to the late Queen as “ your grandmother“

Even Prince Charles and Princess Anne always said 'the Queen' when speaking of her In public.

Goldusttwin · 03/04/2025 10:09

That’s interesting I’d not thought of that but v true. It’s such narc like behaviour where everything down to the choice of words she uses are loaded with her twisted inferiority/superiority delusions. On the surface appearing to sweetly humanise the relationship between a grandmother & her grandson, when in reality trashing & tramping all over the respect that is inferred in a royal title & as you say elevating herself & claiming the true position of superiority & status for herself as “Duchess”. Wow. No wonder there’s so much hate. She’s a class A narcissist just causing damage & hurt wherever she goes. And her enabler is equally culpable in his own flawed way. We should probably stop the oxygen & stop giving her supply. If only!

glitterturd · 03/04/2025 10:16

ThePoshUns · 03/04/2025 08:23

Yes I have and I saw SC being interviewed robustly by Trevor Phillips. maybe Harry could put himself forward for the same level of scrutiny instead of hiding behind his friends.

I am actually stunned that there has been no statement at all - not even " we await the outcome of the investigation". He is like a big baby hiding behind Meghan's spread. It's shocking really. Meanwhile he gets on and prattles about travelyst 🙄

OP posts:
Mylovelygreendress · 03/04/2025 10:35

What exactly does Travelyst do ?

Puzzledandpissedoff · 03/04/2025 10:38

shaming people to be quiet about the racial abuse of a woc isn’t going to work this time!

You're right it's not, @jeffgoldblum - and nor should it shut down thise who genuinely oppose racism - but this is the mess it all descends into when some turn out to be less than sincereì

Many who once had a lot to say are pretty silent ATM and it's not hard to see why, now Harry appears to have used his friend to indicate its only some POC who matter to him ... a shame, but that's his choice and he can't be surprised if folk comment on it

Puzzledandpissedoff · 03/04/2025 10:44

I am actually stunned that there has been no statement at all - not even " we await the outcome of the investigation"

I'm not, @glitterturd - like the rest of his family I'd expect nothing else than Harry keeping anything he considers distasteful to him at arm's length, firmly in the bracket of "someone else's problem to deal with"

As also seen with African Parks ...

IdaGlossop · 03/04/2025 10:52

Puzzledandpissedoff · 03/04/2025 10:44

I am actually stunned that there has been no statement at all - not even " we await the outcome of the investigation"

I'm not, @glitterturd - like the rest of his family I'd expect nothing else than Harry keeping anything he considers distasteful to him at arm's length, firmly in the bracket of "someone else's problem to deal with"

As also seen with African Parks ...

MM2, the new CCO, must be feeling very frustrated. I can't believe she has played say part in what's happened over the last nine days.

glitterturd · 03/04/2025 10:52

Mylovelygreendress · 03/04/2025 10:35

What exactly does Travelyst do ?

Apologies it's Travalyst.

I can't link it for some reason .

OP posts:
OP posts:
Annascaul · 03/04/2025 10:55

glitterturd · 03/04/2025 10:52

Sounds like a load of useless shite.

glitterturd · 03/04/2025 10:55

They empower you to make choices. Eg either your flying choices 😂

Sentebale #4
OP posts:
Mylovelygreendress · 03/04/2025 10:58

Thanks @glitterturd . Unfortunately i can’t take it seriously when Harry uses private jets the way I use the local bus service !

AtIusvue · 03/04/2025 11:04

JADS · 02/04/2025 20:43

That NY Times article is farcical. It goes on and on literally describing every single time she made a meal by the sound of it. It's fawning and boring. Neither receipe sounds nice. The custard pudding with bananas, strawberries, lemon and mint sounds like there is too much going on. No wonder Doria looked unimpressed in the insta reel.

I read that article completely differently, there was so much snark - not just that she was an ‘unknown actress from a medium tv show’ but also how well worn her kitchen was/ designed by the previous owners. Why would anyone write it was designed by the previous owner. Lots of us have kitchens that we didn’t install. I think she was trying to make out, Meg was nothing to aspire to.
Also included was the fact she serves the kids chicken nuggets when she’s at home alone with the kids. The whole article is how she has so much leisurely time at home…and she serves the kids freezer crap.
And that the As ever brand is just a money making scheme.

ViolasandViolets · 03/04/2025 11:15

It wasn’t her kitchen either.

Lunde · 03/04/2025 11:17

Mylovelygreendress · 03/04/2025 10:35

What exactly does Travelyst do ?

It's a big question - no real answers.

It's set up as a company and not a charity,

They claim an exemption so do not produce proper audited accounts so we don't know what activities they undertake and we don't know where its income comes from - only that they made a profit of £320K last year.

They seem to be very management heavy as there is a board of 7 people - but - and it's a big BUT

Prince Harry is listed a a person of significant control and the nature of his control is

  • Ownership of shares – 75% or more
  • Ownership of voting rights - 75% or more
  • Right to appoint or remove directors
So he owns the shares. The shareholders cannot out vote him and he can just sack the board them if he wants. So I have no idea what the board's powers are apart from to rubber stamp what Harry wants.
ViolasandViolets · 03/04/2025 11:17

And that the As ever brand is just a money making scheme.

Not sure why that should be a criticism. Businesses are money making schemes.

Lunde · 03/04/2025 11:19

glitterturd · 03/04/2025 10:52

So it's an information hub and talking shop?

Do they act direct to customers or aim at the travel industry?

ViolasandViolets · 03/04/2025 11:22

Lunde · 03/04/2025 11:17

It's a big question - no real answers.

It's set up as a company and not a charity,

They claim an exemption so do not produce proper audited accounts so we don't know what activities they undertake and we don't know where its income comes from - only that they made a profit of £320K last year.

They seem to be very management heavy as there is a board of 7 people - but - and it's a big BUT

Prince Harry is listed a a person of significant control and the nature of his control is

  • Ownership of shares – 75% or more
  • Ownership of voting rights - 75% or more
  • Right to appoint or remove directors
So he owns the shares. The shareholders cannot out vote him and he can just sack the board them if he wants. So I have no idea what the board's powers are apart from to rubber stamp what Harry wants.

So Harry is promoting his own company? The fact he even owns a company about green travel make him seem even more of a hypocrite.

MissRoseDurward · 03/04/2025 11:38

They empower you to make choices. Eg either your flying choices....

At least that Travalyst website is written in plain English. But talk about stating the bleedin' obvious. A reasonably intelligent Yr6 could probably manage it, following a lesson on the subject and given some resources to work from.

(And when was the last time H travelled by train or coach?)

Lunde · 03/04/2025 11:41

glitterturd · 03/04/2025 10:55

They empower you to make choices. Eg either your flying choices 😂

LOL 😂😂

So the guy that takes private jets everywhere lectures people on not flying

He thinks people should take trains - although he appears to have last taken a train for Travalyst's launch 5 years ago when he insisted on reserving the entire first class carriage for his private use despite his party being too small to fill the seats. (although Will and Kate are seen at stations several times a year - without any fuss)

He wants people to take busses. Does Harry even know what a bus is? Weren't there rumours that he and Meghan refused to take the minibus to the Queen's Jubilee Service with the younger royals (Eugenie/Jack Beatrice/Edo) and that caused the seating kerfuffle in the church as they were meant to arrive and take their seats together but H&M wanted to make their own entrance?

So - as ever - it's do as I say and not as I do because they are "special"

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.