I agree with sweetgingercat
I am holding my fire from making up my mind completely about this issue until I know the outcome of the official enquiry.
I like to judge things as I find them and not be influenced by three threads about Sentabale full of Royalists virtually rubbing their hands with glee over the possibility that Harry may be “in trouble” again as they interpret it. It’s not a terribly edifying spectacle tbh!
I’m a Republican so no loyalties either way to the people involved.
My thoughts so far are, that I do find it strange how so many people seem to be ignoring the fact that it was far from just Harry who resigned.
Also how Linda Chalker called SC dictatorial in the FT article. Say what you like about Chalker, I don’t share her political views, but she does have a lot of experience on boards and in overseas development and aid.
And from my own observation, from the Sky interview, I didn’t find SC to be a particularly sympathetic personality. I felt that if she really was putting the charity first, and not her own profile, then she would have tackled this in a very different way. And she would have been more professional about a kerfuffle over a photo opp. So there are quite possibly mistakes on both sides, which is a crying shame for the beneficiaries.
I also thought it was rather interesting to see Gyles Brandreth and Camilla Tominey on tv being quite supportive of Harry this morning.
Gyles is friendly with the Charles and Camilla and CT usually takes a very pro-palace line, so maybe BP knows something that we don’t about the situation? Or there are similar issues within some of the RF’s charities that they don’t want to draw attention to?