Meghan now flogging clothes for commission.

[AtIusvue]

Commissionable links- means when a potential customer clicks on the link, it's attributed to the affiliate, allowing the brand to record the source of the traffic. If someone buys a product using an affiliate link, the brand will pay the affiliate marketer commission on the sale

But she’s not an influencer?

This is really sad actually.

They didn't have to "earn their bacon" though. Nobody forced them down this road. It was their own choice. They would have had power, status and influence. Now they're reduced to flogging clothes. What a comedown.

A quick google brings up endless articles discussing the agreement they made with the Queen re Mexit. No monetising of titles.
Peter and Zara Phillips do not have titles.

here is a summary:

Yes, as part of their agreement to step back from their roles as senior royals, Prince Harry and Meghan agreed with the Royal Family that they would no longer use their "His/Her Royal Highness" (HRH) titles and would not profit from their royal titles.

Here's a more detailed explanation:
Stepping Back from Royal Duties:
In January 2020, Prince Harry and Meghan announced their decision to step back from their roles as senior members of the Royal Family, a move that became known as "Megxit".

Agreement with the Royal Family:
As part of this agreement, they would no longer be "working members of the Royal Family" and would not use their "Royal Highness" styles.

Retaining Titles:
While they relinquished their HRH titles, they retained their titles of Duke and Duchess of Sussex.

No Commercial Gain:
The agreement also stipulated that they would not profit from their royal titles or use them for commercial gain.

Something of an over-reaction I feel.

tragic
/ˈtradʒɪk/

adjective

causing or characterized by extreme distress or sorrow.
"the shooting was a tragic accident"
Similar:
disastrous

calamitous

catastrophic

cataclysmic

devastating

terrible

dreadful

appalling

horrendous

dire

ruinous

gruesome

awful

miserable

wretched

unfortunate

fatal

deadly

mortal

lethal

deplorable

lamentable

regrettable

abject

grievous

galling

vexatious

Many thanks 🙏

Why is it any different to Zara Tindall's fashion range she models for Musto? Lots of padded jackets, some with the colour 'Windsor wine'

No idea why Meghan gets slated for this. But not Zara.

Please read the many explanations about royal titles.

I have

No Commercial Gain:
The agreement also stipulated that they would not profit from their royal titles or use them for commercial gain.

Someone needs to tell Sarah Ferguson this!

Yes. She had no interest in the UK or the royal family or duty or any of that.

She didn't become an actress because she wanted to act; she became one to get famous. She didn't marry Harry because she wanted to make a go of being part of a thousand year old institution; she did it for more money and fame. She's a Kardashian with a title.

She does actually. It doesn't take much imagination to figure that one out really!!

She was already slammed and ridiculed relentlessly for it!

It doesn't stop her 🤣

Because Zara is NOT and never has been a senior royal.

Plus Zara has never publicly slagged the family off in public. It's actually very simple.

Sarah Ferguson and Meghan Markle are both greedy and grasping. However at least SF didn’t sell the RF out for gain.

Not simple enough for me I'm afraid!

She can trade on her royal credentials. Meghan can't. Okey dokey

You saw it at the engagement announcement

Talking about public figures is a hobby!!! You should try it - it's light-hearted and fun!!

Share your views with the group, do!

They are both an absolute disgrace for how they are behaving. I fear Charles will never put a stop to it though, and it will fall to William to cull their finances, security and any remaining links to the BRF. Then they really will be up shit creek without a paddle.....

Two books on how awful it was in the 'Institution' and an Oprah interview.

And living on a royal Estate despite having been divorced for 30 years from a member of the royal family who has to hide away.
Far worse.

Why are you talking about pills? Weird

Well if you can't perceive the difference that one uses a royal title and the other does not, I can't make you understand.

Neither William, nor any other member of the RF has any control over security.
That is decided by RAVEC on a case by case basis. It's taxpayers' money.

I have no problem with her using it. No need to 'make' me understand anything.

It really makes you wonder about the depth of her feelings for him, doesn't it?

Did see just see Harry as a commercial opportunity for fame and fortune?

In defence of Sarah Ferguson ( a phrase i didnt think I’d use!)
she only sold merchandise while at the beginning of her divorce, as she had hardly any money and large debts .
however since she’s been rescued by her ex and shacked up with him , she’s only wrote books, now has Meghan been criticised for her book? No neither was Harry ( however he was criticised for the content)
so I fail to see the equivalence here.