Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Meghan now flogging clothes for commission.

1000 replies

AtIusvue · 24/03/2025 16:22

Commissionable links- means when a potential customer clicks on the link, it's attributed to the affiliate, allowing the brand to record the source of the traffic. If someone buys a product using an affiliate link, the brand will pay the affiliate marketer commission on the sale

But she’s not an influencer?

This is really sad actually.

Meghan now flogging clothes for commission.
OP posts:
Thread gallery
31
mainecooncatonahottinroof · 24/03/2025 21:28

MaturingCheeseball · 24/03/2025 21:26

So, Supporters, what is your view on Meghan featuring Archie and Lilibet on her selling page?

Don't hold your breath waiting Cheese! 😉

MrsLeonFarrell · 24/03/2025 21:29

IdaGlossop · 24/03/2025 21:09

The French had all this b*llocks sorted in 1789. In Britain, we haven't moved very far. When a Royal person is, for example, 'helping' at a food bank, does the thought cross their mind that they are togged up in clothes worth the value of several hundred food parcels? If they do, how does that make them feel? Are they all donating money without us knowing about it?

I think they probably are donating money, from time to time charities publicise it so I expect it happens more than we think. I'm sure at least some of the royals are aware of the risk of looking like Marie Antoinette but if they don't visit then there is less publicity for the cause. It's a catch 22 in many ways

IcedPurple · 24/03/2025 21:30

MaturingCheeseball · 24/03/2025 21:26

So, Supporters, what is your view on Meghan featuring Archie and Lilibet on her selling page?

Yes, the children are being 'trotted out' with increasing regularity.

And no, hiding their faces doesn't change that.

TaupeMember · 24/03/2025 21:31

Mylovelygreendress · 24/03/2025 16:58

I see the DC are being shown more. I wonder what all the Sussex supporters think about that given the condemnation C and W receive for “ trotting out “ their DC ?
And what happened to not showing photos of A and L which was one thing I did agree with and am surprised that Harry has agreed .

I doubt he has much of a say in anything now

Extiainoiapeial · 24/03/2025 21:31

MaturingCheeseball · 24/03/2025 21:26

So, Supporters, what is your view on Meghan featuring Archie and Lilibet on her selling page?

A sweet picture. The side of a face and the back of a head. I have no idea what they look like facially.

EmpressOfTheThread · 24/03/2025 21:33

Extiainoiapeial · 24/03/2025 21:31

A sweet picture. The side of a face and the back of a head. I have no idea what they look like facially.

True, we last saw Archie's face when he was in the bath in the Netflix programme, and Lilibet when they released the 1st birthday pictures, that jubilee weekend. I expect they've changed a lot, like most children.

EmpressOfTheThread · 24/03/2025 21:33

TaupeMember · 24/03/2025 21:31

I doubt he has much of a say in anything now

I wonder if he knows what's going on.

MrsLeonFarrell · 24/03/2025 21:33

EmpressOfTheThread · 24/03/2025 20:55

This is the woman who was going to modernise the monarchy.

I think she was probably sincere in this and in wanting to hit the ground running. The problem is that she had no idea how to actually achieve things. She says a lot but is lacking the skills, vision and knowledge needed to bring about real change. Philanthropy is easy to talk about and hard to actually achieve in any concrete way.

Influencing and selling stuff is something she had a proven record of with The Tig, maybe she will finally be successful because she is doing what she knows?

BigWillyLittleTodger · 24/03/2025 21:38

mainecooncatonahottinroof · 24/03/2025 21:27

It's literally not the same at all but that doesn't suit your narrative.

It the new but Andrew! But Zara! But Peter!, But David! How far down the family line will we get to? 😂.

mainecooncatonahottinroof · 24/03/2025 21:38

Extiainoiapeial · 24/03/2025 21:31

A sweet picture. The side of a face and the back of a head. I have no idea what they look like facially.

Mark my words, you won't have long to wait.

I hate all those arty farty photos celebs etc post of their babies. Either show a photo or don't show one. We couldn't pick them out in a lineup anyway!

EmpressOfTheThread · 24/03/2025 21:38

MrsLeonFarrell · 24/03/2025 21:33

I think she was probably sincere in this and in wanting to hit the ground running. The problem is that she had no idea how to actually achieve things. She says a lot but is lacking the skills, vision and knowledge needed to bring about real change. Philanthropy is easy to talk about and hard to actually achieve in any concrete way.

Influencing and selling stuff is something she had a proven record of with The Tig, maybe she will finally be successful because she is doing what she knows?

I think you are right. To be fair, she really had little idea and was soon out of her depth. It's a shame that it went this way, but maybe she's found her thing, this sort of lifestyle gig.

BigWillyLittleTodger · 24/03/2025 21:39

Extiainoiapeial · 24/03/2025 21:31

A sweet picture. The side of a face and the back of a head. I have no idea what they look like facially.

You won’t have to wait long to see them merching for mummy in all their glory very soon.

IcedPurple · 24/03/2025 21:39

MrsLeonFarrell · 24/03/2025 21:33

I think she was probably sincere in this and in wanting to hit the ground running. The problem is that she had no idea how to actually achieve things. She says a lot but is lacking the skills, vision and knowledge needed to bring about real change. Philanthropy is easy to talk about and hard to actually achieve in any concrete way.

Influencing and selling stuff is something she had a proven record of with The Tig, maybe she will finally be successful because she is doing what she knows?

She may be doing what she knows, but she doesn't seem to know what she's doing. The Tig had about 14K subscribers, so hardly a major player in the influencer game.

Launching a brand twice with no actual products or trademarks? Jumping from a lifestyle brand which still has no products to affiliate merching clothes? If she wants to make money from this she's going to have to target a specific market with products they might want to buy, but instead she's jumping all over the place.

What's next? Duchess' own cabbage baskets?

EmpressOfTheThread · 24/03/2025 21:39

mainecooncatonahottinroof · 24/03/2025 21:38

Mark my words, you won't have long to wait.

I hate all those arty farty photos celebs etc post of their babies. Either show a photo or don't show one. We couldn't pick them out in a lineup anyway!

I find that so annoying. An arm, a leg, an obscured face... just don't show them.

mainecooncatonahottinroof · 24/03/2025 21:39

MrsLeonFarrell · 24/03/2025 21:33

I think she was probably sincere in this and in wanting to hit the ground running. The problem is that she had no idea how to actually achieve things. She says a lot but is lacking the skills, vision and knowledge needed to bring about real change. Philanthropy is easy to talk about and hard to actually achieve in any concrete way.

Influencing and selling stuff is something she had a proven record of with The Tig, maybe she will finally be successful because she is doing what she knows?

She's been full of hot air and lacking in substance throughout. At least she's consistent I suppose.

She must have thought all her Christmases had come at once when she got her claws into "H"!!

MrsFinkelstein · 24/03/2025 21:40

Extiainoiapeial · 24/03/2025 20:30

Not simple enough for me I'm afraid!

She can trade on her royal credentials. Meghan can't. Okey dokey

Neither of them should be doing it.

Both of them are as bad as each other frankly.

Extiainoiapeial · 24/03/2025 21:40

BigWillyLittleTodger · 24/03/2025 21:39

You won’t have to wait long to see them merching for mummy in all their glory very soon.

Do you have that officially?

I didn't know that.

mainecooncatonahottinroof · 24/03/2025 21:41

EmpressOfTheThread · 24/03/2025 21:39

I find that so annoying. An arm, a leg, an obscured face... just don't show them.

I don't care what the kids look like but those photos are utterly annoying!

IcedPurple · 24/03/2025 21:41

EmpressOfTheThread · 24/03/2025 21:39

I find that so annoying. An arm, a leg, an obscured face... just don't show them.

Same. If you want to keep your kids private, fine. But nobody cares to see their random limbs.

mainecooncatonahottinroof · 24/03/2025 21:41

Extiainoiapeial · 24/03/2025 21:40

Do you have that officially?

I didn't know that.

Just wait. Remember you heard it here first.

BigWillyLittleTodger · 24/03/2025 21:44

Extiainoiapeial · 24/03/2025 21:40

Do you have that officially?

I didn't know that.

Well they own the domain Lilibet’s Closet so it’s just a matter of time.

Extiainoiapeial · 24/03/2025 21:45

That's a shame. It's a privacy thing. Both Beatrice and Eugenie with their new babies did the same.
I quite understand the practice and I find it quite sweet.

EmpressOfTheThread · 24/03/2025 21:46

I think they've missed a trick not merching Elizabeth Arden Eight Hour Cream.

MrsFinkelstein · 24/03/2025 21:46

IcedPurple · 24/03/2025 21:39

She may be doing what she knows, but she doesn't seem to know what she's doing. The Tig had about 14K subscribers, so hardly a major player in the influencer game.

Launching a brand twice with no actual products or trademarks? Jumping from a lifestyle brand which still has no products to affiliate merching clothes? If she wants to make money from this she's going to have to target a specific market with products they might want to buy, but instead she's jumping all over the place.

What's next? Duchess' own cabbage baskets?

Edited

She'd better not move into the cabbage bowl market. We have very high standards! Gin

Onlyonekenobe · 24/03/2025 22:03

andyouwillknowusbythetrailofdead · 24/03/2025 20:26

Yes. She had no interest in the UK or the royal family or duty or any of that.

She didn't become an actress because she wanted to act; she became one to get famous. She didn't marry Harry because she wanted to make a go of being part of a thousand year old institution; she did it for more money and fame. She's a Kardashian with a title.

This is absolutely right. And every action since the proposal (taped for posterity) has been in furtherance of the aim of personal fame and fortune. (I’d add to that being accepted by the Hollywood/CA crowd that rejected her at school). All the supposedly philanthropic activities have been in furtherance of herself, in pursuit of the goal of fame and fortune. She has used young people, dead people, dying people, every interaction as an opportunity. She has been ruthless in cutting off people who got in her way. She has bullied to get her way.

And the sad thing is, even if she has achieved what she wanted (I don’t think she has, she’s a pariah in the circles she most wants to run in), it won’t be enough. That’s the thing with hollow ambitions, and it’s what happens when you lie (including under oath), bully and malign. She will have all the trappings of success and wealth, but that’s it.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.