Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

If Harry still lived in the UK , do you think the feud would have been sorted by now?

475 replies

ThisPlumShark · 10/03/2025 17:34

I do feel the biggest hurdle between Harry and his family is that he lives in another country, I think if he lived in the UK there would be more opportunity for them to sort it out

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
ScarlettOYara · 11/03/2025 17:21

JandamiHash · 11/03/2025 17:13

Also the Royal Family would know that the overwhelming liklihood is that a woman who is mixed race but presents as white, mixed with the pale redhead Spencer gene, would probably turn out no darker than say Catherine. What exactly is there to be concerned about anyway? They know he married a mixed race woman and let him break all sorts of rules and customs (around the fact she’s divorced) to make it happen. They supported it immensely, got o bombed with the wedding and Charles gave her away. Why on earth would they suddenly worry about the fact they will have children likely paler than she is?!

Of course they weren't worried! Meghan said it to Oprah to cause controversy. To present herself as a victim.

My2cents1975 · 11/03/2025 17:22

A CNN article in July 2013 speculated on Prince George’s potential appearance including eye colour, hair, height and skin tone. Below is a link to the full article and I have copied the relevant portion on skin tone:
What – and who – will the royal baby look like?
“Catherine’s commoner genes might lead to a somewhat darker-skinned baby, Saggar said.
The royals, he explained, are pretty pale. Catherine’s skin has a considerably more olive tone, and the baby will likely be somewhere between the two – but more like Catherine because her genes are dominant over lighter ones.
“The odds are the child will have darker skin color than the royals might be used to,” Saggar said.”

Two things struck me about the Dutch extract. 1. Few Americans (and I’d argue many British people) would know that Camilla was the Princess of Wales at the time of the alleged discussion and 2. Omid strategically used titles for the alleged conversation with Harry and then listed the names that were in Charles’ letter, so it is possible that different people were involved in the alleged conversation and versus those listed in the letter.

Given the precedent with George, it is likely Charles counseled Harry on how the media could speculate on Archie’s appearance and tried to advise Harry on how to deal with this issue using the Cambridges' experience as an example.

Omid wrote “the then Princess of Wales remained silent”. Given Harry’s animosity towards his stepmother Camilla, "the then Princess of Wales", it is reasonable that she would have maintained a prudent silence while Charles was counseling his son.

Heaven knows what Harry with his drug-addled memory relayed to Meghan regarding that conversation. Post Oprah interview, Charles sent a letter in good faith explaining the matter only to have that same letter weaponized against Catherine.

We do know that Charles has a copy of the letter that he sent. And that eventually it will be released to the public. H&M’s descendants will have to live with the consequences of H&M’s decisions when that letter eventually comes to light.

ScarlettOYara · 11/03/2025 17:27

Even during the interview, Harry and Meghan couldn't agree. Harry said discussions when they were engaged, Meghan said when she was pregnant.
Meghan also linked the potential colour to titles and security.

JandamiHash · 11/03/2025 17:29

ScarlettOYara · 11/03/2025 17:27

Even during the interview, Harry and Meghan couldn't agree. Harry said discussions when they were engaged, Meghan said when she was pregnant.
Meghan also linked the potential colour to titles and security.

She also said you have to have a title to get security I’m sure. Which is a lie. I remembered watching knowing the terms of the letters patent, and thinking “Um you were NEVER getting a title”. Then they had the nerve to name their daughter after the woman whose reputation and family they tried to trash. I really just think they’re awful and that the English contingent are better off without them

ScarlettOYara · 11/03/2025 17:40

JandamiHash · 11/03/2025 17:29

She also said you have to have a title to get security I’m sure. Which is a lie. I remembered watching knowing the terms of the letters patent, and thinking “Um you were NEVER getting a title”. Then they had the nerve to name their daughter after the woman whose reputation and family they tried to trash. I really just think they’re awful and that the English contingent are better off without them

Yes, they've never explained how Archie and Lilibet are actually Prince and Princess 🙄

TheMorels · 11/03/2025 17:45

ScarlettOYara · 11/03/2025 17:40

Yes, they've never explained how Archie and Lilibet are actually Prince and Princess 🙄

Aren’t they automatically entitled to be styled that way because they’re direct descendants of the monarch?

ScarlettOYara · 11/03/2025 17:46

TheMorels · 11/03/2025 17:45

Aren’t they automatically entitled to be styled that way because they’re direct descendants of the monarch?

Of course. Which made the claims about not getting those titles utterly ridiculous.

JandamiHash · 11/03/2025 17:51

TheMorels · 11/03/2025 17:45

Aren’t they automatically entitled to be styled that way because they’re direct descendants of the monarch?

Only grandchildren of the monarch get Prince and Princess titles. UNLESS you’re in the direct line of succession, in hi h case you’re born with a title.

When Catherine was pregnant with George the Queen changed a few things to namely:

  1. Make sure boys didn’t leapfrog their sisters in the line of succession.
  2. Make sure that siblings of those in the direct line of succession got titles to to evade any jealousy.
Had the Queen not done number 1, and Charlotte was born first, she wouldn’t be Queen as long as she had little brothers

Had the Queen not done number 2 only George would be Prince and Charlotte and Louis would be something else like Lady or Viscount

Archie and Lilibet were never gonna get Prince/Princess titles until the Queen died. They were offered Earl of Dumbarton for Archie but reportedly Meghan didn’t want her son to have “Dumb” in his title.

ScarlettOYara · 11/03/2025 17:53

....and if Harry didn't know that, or misinformed Meghan, he's to blame.

Rhaidimiddim · 11/03/2025 18:15

MiserableMrsMopp · 11/03/2025 13:26

No, because the future king can't do that. But he's a nasty piece of work. Not entirely his fault (their screwy upbringing) but he's a chip off the old Phillip block all right. And I'd put good money on the skin colour comment being his.

If Phillip was such a racist, surely MM would have been able to provide an example or two to Oprah or at thar Queen of Hertz award do, where she collected her award forvstanding up to RF racism.

CrazyOldMe · 11/03/2025 18:22

I always find Harry has such a brass neck for calling out others over racism giving his own past!

TheMeasure · 11/03/2025 18:24

CrazyOldMe · 11/03/2025 18:22

I always find Harry has such a brass neck for calling out others over racism giving his own past!

Not to mention accepting a fucking AWARD for it.

JandamiHash · 11/03/2025 18:39

CrazyOldMe · 11/03/2025 18:22

I always find Harry has such a brass neck for calling out others over racism giving his own past!

Oh but he had a meeting with a Rabbi so that’s ok 🙄

Garlicgarlicgarlic · 11/03/2025 19:18

@CoffeeCantata thank you for answering that! I never knew there were so many untruths- Eg. pretending they were already married, lying in court etc.!

Mylovelygreendress · 11/03/2025 19:39

JandamiHash · 11/03/2025 17:21

I am a “royal follower”, always have been, and I remember when he put out that tantrum of a statement when he was dating Meghan telling the press to leave his girlfriend alone - I had no idea he had a girlfriend, it was the first I’d heard of it and I remember thinking “This is a bit out of character from laid back Harry”. How wrong was I

I can’t remember which author wrote this but apparently Meghan threatened to end the relationship if Harry didn’t go public about it . Clearly Harry panicked , ignored advice and issued his statement / tantrum.
Charles was about to embark on an important tour and it is said he was furious that his event was being overshadowed.,

prelovedusername · 11/03/2025 19:56

Harry is not the problem. Meghan is not the problem. The problem is Harry met Meghan. They are a toxic mix and always will be wherever they are. If they lived in the UK the RF would have to be more creative in avoiding them, but avoid them they would.

Bloom15 · 11/03/2025 20:24

I don't think so - not with the Oprah interview and the autobiography - people aren't going to forgive those. Harry doesn't come across as the brightest bulb does he? Cross that with the entitlement he has and it's not a good combination.

I don't care either way but he just comes across even worse than William, Charles etc. as he flounced!

CathyorClaire · 11/03/2025 20:38

If Harold had remained in the UK the feud would never have happened IMO.

His problem is he's always been a tetchy, entitled piece of work and while he's not the only one,unlike the others he couldn't find anyone to overlook it (which in itself speaks volumes).

Had he managed it I think he'd have sucked up the grunt stuff in return for an unimaginably luxurious lifestyle just like the rest of 'em.

MissRoseDurward · 11/03/2025 20:47

If Harold had remained in the UK the feud would never have happened IMO.

It had started before he left. Spare just made it public.

CathyorClaire · 11/03/2025 21:05

It had started before he left. Spare just made it public.

Had it? When?

Can we rely on 'Waaaagh' as a reputable source?

Willy seemed very happy to placate Harold with redirected funds (not his own, natch) from the Royal Foundation to Sussex Royal/ MWX.

Funds (as an aside) that have never been adequately accounted for after their subsequent transfer to the privately controlled and beyond UK charitable scrutiny, Travalyst.

CoffeeCantata · 12/03/2025 06:58

ScarlettOYara · 11/03/2025 17:05

The only thing we know for sure, from Harry, is that he himself reflected on the possible colouring of their children.

And (as I said upthread) that Meghan gushes about her children's 'blue, blue eyes' and fair hair.

Just as well it's Meghan who said that, isn't it? You know, I think she herself needs to watch what she says. She hardly comes across as valuing her own racial heritage - in many ways.

Somethingthecatdraggedin7 · 12/03/2025 07:39

ScarlettOYara · 11/03/2025 17:04

True. Plus, very spiteful. Imagine getting someone labelled racist on the world stage? What a vile thing to do.
Then accepting a Kennedy Award for fighting racism in the RF.
Then telling Tom Bradby that they never claimed that the RF were racist, it was the British media.
Shameless liars.

Oprah has a lot to answer for in her now infamous “interview”. She asked no questions to clarify the alleged skin colour discussion comment but instead reacted with faux incredulity ramping up the shock horror of it all and allowing MM to get away with her victim role by snide insinuation because clear accusations would have been actionable.
A decent interviewer would have asked for context. Oprah was clearly more interested in what great tv this would make than the truth and the rest of the world was happy to take this as investigative journalism rather than the celebrity wank it actually was.

ScarlettOYara · 12/03/2025 07:45

Oprah just fanned the flames.

Somethingthecatdraggedin7 · 12/03/2025 08:04

I can’t remember now but was there a reason given why parts of the Oprah debacle were individual with MM rather than the two twats together?

Mylovelygreendress · 12/03/2025 08:06

Somethingthecatdraggedin7 · 12/03/2025 08:04

I can’t remember now but was there a reason given why parts of the Oprah debacle were individual with MM rather than the two twats together?

Because Meghan has to be the centre of attention ? See also , walking halfway down the aisle alone .