I'm not a fan of celebrities touring disaster areas but turning up with a donation at what seems to be a smaller charity this bringing publicity to a donation point others may not be aware of, that's a good idea. It's a great pity she didn't stick with that.
She'd be much better making a generous donation.
Cold hard cash is much more useful in crisis situations than 'stuff' which has to be sorted though, washed, organised and in many cases chucked because people are 'donating' all sorts of rubbish.
But I do wonder is Harry so stuck on the need to be acknowledged as royal that he is suggesting quasi royal things, like the disaster tourism, that backfire? Maybe Meghan is actually better at gauging what is appropriate as a celebrity, which is why she is doing this solo?
I think it's the opposite. He looked very uncomfortable in the Pasadena photo op, whereas she looked in her element.
He's not the brightest, but he does know what real royal work is, and the Pasadena stunt wasn't.