Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Awful card

468 replies

Jostuki · 16/12/2024 18:57

Happy holiday season. 🙄

Awful card
OP posts:
Thread gallery
15
TheBeeStings · 17/12/2024 13:04

what did the nigeria and colombia trips have to do archewell?
I thought that was just random self publicity?

AmazingGraze · 17/12/2024 13:05

Mylovelygreendress · 17/12/2024 09:57

Harry and Meghan never strike me as having a sense of humour . Meghan in particular takes herself very seriously.
There are some odd things about the photo ; Meghan’s very long arm , Lili’s left foot to name but 2 . Also puzzled by the children’s clothing . Archie in long trousers and fleece and Lili in a summer dress with long white socks ?

I noticed that about the children’s clothes too. They look like they are dressed for different seasons. Personally I find the whole running into the parental arms photo extremely odd.

TheBeeStings · 17/12/2024 13:07

FrenchAlps · 17/12/2024 12:53

The card is odd because the 2024 Archewell roundup video issued last week was much more professional.

https://people.com/meghan-markle-prince-harry-reveal-behind-the-scenes-video-biggest-moments-2024-exclusive-8752642

The video is moe professional but still too self aggrandising.

They need to dial back the grand self promotion and instaed project a more low key modest image of themselves, it would serve them so much better.

AmazingGraze · 17/12/2024 13:07

The other thing about the Happy Holidays card is that every day is a holiday for them as they don’t work in any sense that normal people would understand. So it’s a bit ‘enjoy your time off whilst we carry on doing nothing much and living in luxury’.

IcedPurple · 17/12/2024 13:36

TheBeeStings · 17/12/2024 13:07

The video is moe professional but still too self aggrandising.

They need to dial back the grand self promotion and instaed project a more low key modest image of themselves, it would serve them so much better.

Yes, looking at that video I still have very little idea of what their 'work' involves, other than a lot of performative hugging.

Bingobanging · 17/12/2024 14:09

Mylovelygreendress · 17/12/2024 09:57

Harry and Meghan never strike me as having a sense of humour . Meghan in particular takes herself very seriously.
There are some odd things about the photo ; Meghan’s very long arm , Lili’s left foot to name but 2 . Also puzzled by the children’s clothing . Archie in long trousers and fleece and Lili in a summer dress with long white socks ?

I think this is a strategy that all the Royals use-for any ‘public’ appearances of children, they generally dress them like 1950’s throwbacks so that they’re then less recognisable if inadvertently seen in public. You generally wouldn’t look twice at a random child in a park dressed ‘normally’ but you very definitely would if they were wearing the smocked dresses/formal suits that even the Wales kids are paraded in on formal occasions.

IcedPurple · 17/12/2024 14:14

Bingobanging · 17/12/2024 14:09

I think this is a strategy that all the Royals use-for any ‘public’ appearances of children, they generally dress them like 1950’s throwbacks so that they’re then less recognisable if inadvertently seen in public. You generally wouldn’t look twice at a random child in a park dressed ‘normally’ but you very definitely would if they were wearing the smocked dresses/formal suits that even the Wales kids are paraded in on formal occasions.

But the Wales children, one of whom is a future King, have a public role.

There's no reason for anyone to see Archie and Lili as their parents are private citizens. So no need for the quaint 1940s attire. And why is Archie dressed 'normally'?

AndrinaAdamosballetshoes · 17/12/2024 14:51

BemusedAmerican · 17/12/2024 12:44

I think they just sent an intern down to Staples and told them to order a holiday card package using the supplied business templates.

The US does not shut down for Christmas, or at least in the metropolitan areas. Too many non-Christians. You can even find an emergency veterinarian if needed.

There are emergency vets throughout the UK that work 365 days a year, it’s a standard service, it just costs a lot more on Christmas Day or bank holidays.

onlylarkin · 17/12/2024 15:08

WinterCrow · 17/12/2024 11:10

I may well be wrong, but I don't think there's 'outrage' being expressed - more that one poster is offended, and quite a few others find the juxtaposition of British royal / monarch-bestowed titles and the use of a US popular greeting to be dichotomous and/or a tad hypocritical and/or a bit comical.

Personally I find it interesting the lengths that H&M went to in order to have a full Church of England wedding, and the royally religious symbolism that they accepted. This included Meghan being baptised into the C of E by the Archbishop of Canterbury in March 2018 in a royal chapel. The monarch is the Church of England's Supreme Governor, and in 2018 both she and the Archbishop were present at H&M's wedding in a royal C of E chapel. This seemed a pretty full on commitment to the Church of England from H&M. The monarch bestowed their Sussex titles on them upon their marriage. Harry of course is on record saying that he supports the monarchy.

So with that context in mind, I think most posters are raising an eyebrow in amusement at the rather shallow-looking dichotomy between the ducal Sussexing and all that that signifies, and the happy holidaying.

😂 offended. Glad you are able to admit you are wrong about that.

smilesy · 17/12/2024 15:09

BemusedAmerican · 17/12/2024 12:44

I think they just sent an intern down to Staples and told them to order a holiday card package using the supplied business templates.

The US does not shut down for Christmas, or at least in the metropolitan areas. Too many non-Christians. You can even find an emergency veterinarian if needed.

Tbf the UK doesn’t shut down due to particularly religious reasons these days at Christmas and we have many religions here too. There is no law that says businesses must shut at Christmas. It’s more of a tradition. Businesses are often shut from Christmas to New Year because it isn’t practical for them to open up for one or two day in between the two holidays. Shops are open though. And yes, vet services are available. It would be rather inhumane to make an animal have to wait for treatment because it is a holiday. In fact, in my experience, animals have a habit of doing great mischiefs to themselves at weekends and holidays when it’s most inconvenient 😆

edited because missed a word

IcedPurple · 17/12/2024 15:12

BemusedAmerican · 17/12/2024 12:44

I think they just sent an intern down to Staples and told them to order a holiday card package using the supplied business templates.

The US does not shut down for Christmas, or at least in the metropolitan areas. Too many non-Christians. You can even find an emergency veterinarian if needed.

Considerably more Americans than Britons identify as Christian.

onlylarkin · 17/12/2024 15:51

IcedPurple · 17/12/2024 15:12

Considerably more Americans than Britons identify as Christian.

So? Just over 60% of the US population identify as Christian. We still manage to be inclusive to the other 40% of the population who are not Christian by simply saying Happy Holidays.

In the UK, just over 40% of the population are Christian and look how many of you are upset because, gasp, someone somewhere else that doesnt affect you, said something other then Happy Christmas.

It is actually a fascinating thing to witness.

JaneJeffer · 17/12/2024 15:53

PrettyFlyforaMaiTai · 16/12/2024 19:39

Meghan’s and Lili’s left foot look really odd compared to the rest of their bodies. I really feel this could be a photoshopped or doctored photograph.

The little dog looks like there's something wrong with his spine Sad

wigsonthegreenandhatsforthelifting · 17/12/2024 16:03

WinterCrow · 17/12/2024 11:10

I may well be wrong, but I don't think there's 'outrage' being expressed - more that one poster is offended, and quite a few others find the juxtaposition of British royal / monarch-bestowed titles and the use of a US popular greeting to be dichotomous and/or a tad hypocritical and/or a bit comical.

Personally I find it interesting the lengths that H&M went to in order to have a full Church of England wedding, and the royally religious symbolism that they accepted. This included Meghan being baptised into the C of E by the Archbishop of Canterbury in March 2018 in a royal chapel. The monarch is the Church of England's Supreme Governor, and in 2018 both she and the Archbishop were present at H&M's wedding in a royal C of E chapel. This seemed a pretty full on commitment to the Church of England from H&M. The monarch bestowed their Sussex titles on them upon their marriage. Harry of course is on record saying that he supports the monarchy.

So with that context in mind, I think most posters are raising an eyebrow in amusement at the rather shallow-looking dichotomy between the ducal Sussexing and all that that signifies, and the happy holidaying.

This what I was getting at - either they are the Duke and Duchess of Sussex and members of the RF and use "Happy Christmas" (and remembering that his father is the Supreme Governor of the church of England!!) or they are Harry and Meghan, and go all American!

IcedPurple · 17/12/2024 16:03

onlylarkin · 17/12/2024 15:51

So? Just over 60% of the US population identify as Christian. We still manage to be inclusive to the other 40% of the population who are not Christian by simply saying Happy Holidays.

In the UK, just over 40% of the population are Christian and look how many of you are upset because, gasp, someone somewhere else that doesnt affect you, said something other then Happy Christmas.

It is actually a fascinating thing to witness.

What an aggressive response to a comment which wasn't even directed at you. Are you scrolling through this thread desperately looking to take offence or what?

The post to which I was actually responding said "The US does not shut down for Christmas, or at least in the metropolitan areas. Too many non-Christians." To which I pointed out that statistically, far more Americans than Britons identify as Christian. Which is a fact.

Are you going to come back at me with faux outrage and another non sequitur?

onlylarkin · 17/12/2024 16:20

No, I am having a conversation. That is all.

Onlyonekenobe · 17/12/2024 16:45

wigsonthegreenandhatsforthelifting · 17/12/2024 00:28

The country shuts down because even in 2024, the UK is a predominantly Christian country. I don't expect "neutral language" to be used as it's offensive to me as a Christian.

I would be more than happy for the country to shut down for all the other feasts and festivals from other cultures, but I can't see it happening! I will take every public holiday going!

Their foundation is meant to be a charity, therefore not "corporate".

WTF?

Why do you care that non-Christians, who live in a country that shuts down at the end of the year because of a Christian holiday, wish each other non-Christian greetings? Or, indeed, why decent Christians might wish non-Christians non-Christian greetings? You're not the only person living in the UK. People are allowed to talk to people other than you and your Christian brethren.

And is Christmas not a holiday? So, can you not stretch your imagination as far as "holiday includes Christmas"? How old are you? Season's Greetings cards have been around in the UK for decades. We've ALWAYS sent those out, never Merry Christmas cards.

Have to say, the irony of a Christian taking offence at being wished a happy holiday is quite something. In reality, what you really want to say is "every other religion and every atheist and agnostic person should bugger off and respect ME in my BRITISH, CHRISTIAN country because you don't count as much as I do as a superior Christian British person" 💁

wordler · 17/12/2024 17:16

I think the most interesting thing about the card for me is that it is a visual example of the confusion in their approach to post working royal life and why their attempts to create a successful brand isn't working yet - they lack any cohesive vision for the way they are presenting themselves.

Now it's possible to have many strings to one's bow and manage different roles but you can't usually throw all those things together in one brand/business/holiday card and have it look successful.

Where it goes wrong:

'From the office of" - pseudo formal role language to invoke officials in a formal role: heads of state, politicians, working royals representing heads of state.
They need to let this go - it makes them look silly - normal people with no official role don't have an 'office' issuing stuff for them. Just like it would be weird to have 'from the office of Zara Tindall' 'from the office of Princess Eugenie' 'from the office of George Clooney'

Celebrities often post social media on their holiday cards but they usually snap a picture of the actual card they are sending out to family and friends and slap a few extra holiday greetings on there. Photos are professionally taken and clear.

Speaking of Clooney - he's a celebrity who has a serious nonprofit foundation represented by him and his wife jointly. Social media posts and website posts for the foundation are slick professional and focused on the work at hand - George and Amil rarely appear front and center and they never mix in their personal or family life in this messaging so as not to detract from the core business of the foundation.

The whole card is horribly designed and the family image front and centre is far too low grade an image compared the rest of the card. And I'm astonished they used the picture of Harry with the patient after how controversial that particular visit was. If they want to position themselves as professional media and content producers they can't be letting such amateur work be their representative - especially if they know it will get picked up and talked about in the media.

They look like they are trying to constantly be official royals, celebrities, philanthropists, loved up family members, business owners and influencers all in one package - it's way too messy. If you want to protect the kids' privacy don't use their image at all in a PR stunt.

MayaKovskaya · 17/12/2024 17:21

I think those are all excellent points, @wordler .
👏

friendlycat · 17/12/2024 17:37

@ wordler
Absolutely sums it up perfectly.

Rhaidimiddim · 17/12/2024 18:04

TheBeeStings · 17/12/2024 13:04

what did the nigeria and colombia trips have to do archewell?
I thought that was just random self publicity?

Er, they donated, er.... some drums, was it?

JADS · 17/12/2024 18:10

@wordler agreed. It's visually a bit of a confusing mess. Five of the photos are close ups but the family one is far away and looks jarring. It does all look a bit white saviour and feels exploitative.

I can live with Happy Holidays, they live in the States. 'From the office of ...' sounds way weirder.

JSMill · 17/12/2024 18:31

'From the office of' is incredibly wrong. They hold no official role.
There's something not right about the picture with the children. It's blurry and some details look wrong, such as Lilibet's height relative to her older brother.

FrenchAlps · 17/12/2024 19:00

wordler · 17/12/2024 17:16

I think the most interesting thing about the card for me is that it is a visual example of the confusion in their approach to post working royal life and why their attempts to create a successful brand isn't working yet - they lack any cohesive vision for the way they are presenting themselves.

Now it's possible to have many strings to one's bow and manage different roles but you can't usually throw all those things together in one brand/business/holiday card and have it look successful.

Where it goes wrong:

'From the office of" - pseudo formal role language to invoke officials in a formal role: heads of state, politicians, working royals representing heads of state.
They need to let this go - it makes them look silly - normal people with no official role don't have an 'office' issuing stuff for them. Just like it would be weird to have 'from the office of Zara Tindall' 'from the office of Princess Eugenie' 'from the office of George Clooney'

Celebrities often post social media on their holiday cards but they usually snap a picture of the actual card they are sending out to family and friends and slap a few extra holiday greetings on there. Photos are professionally taken and clear.

Speaking of Clooney - he's a celebrity who has a serious nonprofit foundation represented by him and his wife jointly. Social media posts and website posts for the foundation are slick professional and focused on the work at hand - George and Amil rarely appear front and center and they never mix in their personal or family life in this messaging so as not to detract from the core business of the foundation.

The whole card is horribly designed and the family image front and centre is far too low grade an image compared the rest of the card. And I'm astonished they used the picture of Harry with the patient after how controversial that particular visit was. If they want to position themselves as professional media and content producers they can't be letting such amateur work be their representative - especially if they know it will get picked up and talked about in the media.

They look like they are trying to constantly be official royals, celebrities, philanthropists, loved up family members, business owners and influencers all in one package - it's way too messy. If you want to protect the kids' privacy don't use their image at all in a PR stunt.

"George and Amil rarely appear front and center and they never mix in their personal or family life in this messaging so as not to detract from the core business of the foundation"

Michelle Obama spoke outdirectly after the OW interview and pointedly advised M&H to very consciously use and direct their 'light' (press attention) on to the causes otherwise it will naturally stay on you and the cause is never uplifted.

They look like they are trying to constantly be official royals, celebrities, philanthropists, loved up family members, business owners and influencers all in one package - it's way too messy.

Agree that it looks messy but many people already wear all these hats and maintain a cohesive brand - because they have a strategy around brand heirarchies. V basic marketing principles which either they fail to grasp or refuse to deploy.

stripeyshutters · 17/12/2024 20:08

JSMill · 17/12/2024 11:43

@WinterCrow thank you for articulating what I was thinking but I couldn't find the words! They haven't given up trying to be America's royal family, have they?
One thing I find strange is how Lillibet is dressed. It seems very British, especially the knee length socks.

It is typical private school uniform in the UK. Funnily enough the RF haters love to criticise the way the Cambridge children dress but I imagine it's ok for Lillibet.,

It's nothing like Britney's sexy over the knee socks 😂 never mind the shirt 😂

Awful card
Swipe left for the next trending thread