The other point to note is that any Head of Communications worth her salt would know that putting out information which is immediately undermined is no way to build credibility.
If today’s story was true, when Ashley herself was quoted by name in the US Weekly push back piece on 24 September in US Weekly saying this, both she and Meghan would have known she would also shortly be leaving:
Ashley Hansen, global press secretary to the duke and duchess and the head of communications for Archewell, says her bosses couldn’t have been more supportive when she had to take some extended time off for a serious surgery. “When I told them, I was met with the kind of concern and care a parent would express if it were their own child,” she recalls. “I was asked what I needed, how and if they could help, and told to take as much time as I needed.” Hansen says Harry and Meghan sent flowers and care packages, “but most profoundly to me, Meghan would personally reach out to my husband daily to make sure that we both were OK and had support,” she adds. “It meant so much to him and even more to me. You don’t realize how much that kind of kindness and thought means until you need it.”
Clearly, you don’t give notice, set up, brand and launch your own communications agency in just 10 days.
If today’s story was the truth it would have been the easiest thing in the world to add that praise (“Meghan is so supportive she’s given me the confidence to launch my own agency! She even contributed to the name!”) to the US Weekly article. And sensible too, because when Ashley Hansen does announce shortly afterwards that she’s also leaving, the shakey credibility of the US Weekly article is immediately undermined.
So either Ashley is a completely incompetent Head of Communications, or today’s announcement of her departure is completely contrived.