Hates Sites

[TicTacToes]

I’m very interested to know whether sites that are clearly pro Meghan and Harry are now considered ‘hate’ sites when they publish opinion pieces supportive of either of them. A case in point being Celebitchy where I’ve taken a gander at the articles which seem supportive of H and M and other celebrities, the latest article is kinda supportive of Taylor Swift. I see it’s been around for donkeys. Some of the comments, however, posted by people seem out there and I do not get the humour at all. Overall, it seems the ‘working’ British Royals are not thought well of so it may also have a Republican strain running through it. Anyway, be interested to know if there is a history to be aware of as I do not like hate sites and if this is rabidly communist or fascist it should be flagged up as such.

Also, do we know what settlement amount William received from Murdoch? This seems to be generally what is on record:

Prince Harry said the settlement was £1m in his witness statement in the court proceedings. Which was of course a complete invasion of his brother’s privacy (another one…).

Oh yes, Serenster I’d forgotten that. Thanks.

Do you know if there’s any valid source that says William gave that money as a gift?

There seems to have been an increasing number of new names who post very similar things and then disappear to be replaced by more new names who post almost identical responses. And none of those names seem keen on discussion, it is all attack.

It's hard not to conclude that there is some kind of coordination behind the scenes. I tend to use 'Willy' or 'hee hee' as markers of revolving name posters.

Having said that elsewhere online there are some who are obsessed with posting and perpetuating lies about the Sussexes but I have never seen those lies here.

Mrs LeonFarrell
There seems to have been an increasing number of new names who post very similar things and then disappear to be replaced by more new names who post almost identical responses. And none of those names seem keen on discussion, it is all attack.

Yes - and the attacks are usually hackneyed repetitions of discredited gossip anyway. Whatever new events or issues have occurred, they ignore everything and never answer questions. They are really pathetic and I think, dim, because they don't seem capable of actually engaging with a developing discussion if it's not part of the script they've been given.

'escapist entertainment.'

No, it's concerted, targeted bile and abuse led by one woman who has a stunningly irrational hatred of the rf, particularly Kate and William. Contributors to the site wait for Kaiser to 'interpret' content on their behalf then indulge in a pile on with absolutely no concern for truth.

Nothing! We should all travel by horse and coach!