Hates Sites

[TicTacToes]

I’m very interested to know whether sites that are clearly pro Meghan and Harry are now considered ‘hate’ sites when they publish opinion pieces supportive of either of them. A case in point being Celebitchy where I’ve taken a gander at the articles which seem supportive of H and M and other celebrities, the latest article is kinda supportive of Taylor Swift. I see it’s been around for donkeys. Some of the comments, however, posted by people seem out there and I do not get the humour at all. Overall, it seems the ‘working’ British Royals are not thought well of so it may also have a Republican strain running through it. Anyway, be interested to know if there is a history to be aware of as I do not like hate sites and if this is rabidly communist or fascist it should be flagged up as such.

Harry is currently dealing with a judge that wants his past texts. Not a good idea to mention them on SM. 😁

If the above posts are the work of the new UK PR guy, H & M are better off hiring the incompetent banner company. I'm sure the company can be tracked down.

I can’t see this working out in Harry’s favour.

I wonder if he wishes he’d just kept his head down and settled quietly in Canada. Or elsewhere.

It is all a bit of a mess.

Did he write in Spare about the first few months in quarantine ? Nobody was discussing Megxit from March to November 2020 until they released the cemetery photo shoot as part of their privacy tour.

It's not " more easier" . It's more easy or easier but still they don't apply. Sorry but things like this jump out at me.

Enter the pigeons!

The pigeons have it.

😂

I love the fact that Harry and Meghan do have the private life they so wanted. Out when they want to be and no royal rota. Keeps the Daily Muck on the back foot.

God bless the Sussex family.

'And, on here, I’ve noticed that any speculation about the longevity of Harry and Meghan’s marriage and predictions of their future divorce is poured over and added to by certain posters, yet when a poster speculates on another royal couple’s marriage there are howls of outrage and pile ons, and ‘disgustings’ etc'

So you didn't see the many posts where William was referred to as peg, and the many snide references to Rose Hanbury? So there's certainly no 'one rule' going on here. Or doesn't that count?

Of course it doesn’t count @Gorgonemilezola

The difference is that we can and do hold valid opinions.

Others just choose to spread rumours and cast aspersions. Just like the Spare one. If they do that for fee? More fool them.

Not squaddies either of course. Certainly not.

Spare parts though.

God bless the Sussex family indeed. I should imagine the pearlies will be shut to two of them.

But you and I know nothing about their 'private lives'. There are lots of rumours, which I won't repeat here, but you know what I'm referring to.

I think their loved-upness and 'living the dream' PR is very much that - PR. I'm amazed anyone takes it at face value. They're a double-act and they both know their survival depends on being seen as in love and living a wonderful life in Hollywood. It's so like the Duke and Duchess of Windsor - they sold themselves as being the great love story, and found themselves (or at least, Wallis did) trapped in the myth.

From what I have read Edward VIII was very bitter about his lack of status, and Wallis not being HRH.

I don't think either of them were happy with their 'great love story' and how it played out. Luckily they didn't have any children so the people most affected were those making that choice.

They also sneered about the 'dutiful' brother and his wife. So many parallels!

Kaiser is right about this:

https://www.celebitchy.com/880529/did_american_icon_venus_williams_snub_prince_harry_at_the_espys/

Could you summarise? I don't want to give hate sites like celebitchy the hits.

I feel the same about the DM, though on the whole think DM has to abide by some (not completely adequate) regulation.

The day I click on a link to read the guff from someone called Kaiser is the day I will break the internet connection in this house.

I don’t want to read the words of some arse licking zealot thanking you.

TicTacToes · Today 11:23
Kaiser is right about this:

So could you summarise? I always feel I need a shower after looking at Celebitchy!

I find it creepy band disturbing that the SS is controlled by someone using the name Kaiser.

Kaiser isn't right about anything. They're a thoroughly inadequate human being who's raison d'etre is disseminating hatred and lies. Bullying and cowardly. They've created some weird cult and ought to be thoroughly ashamed.

Ha ha, yes! She (it is a she, apparently) surely can't have missed the irony - can she? On Celebitchy you can never be sure. Well, at least she stopped short of 'Fuhrer', but I'm afraid that's the vibe I get from Kaiser.

Someone recently on MN said that Kaiser started off as a super-fan of Benedict Cumberbatch. I wonder how she dealt with the trauma of seeing him at Wimbledon a) with his gorgeous, cultured and gracious wife and b) sitting behind Catherine and clapping her enthusiastically? A bit of plate-smashing and rug chewing must have gone on, I guess.

It is creepy bemusedAmerican. Of all the names to choose they chose a creepy bastard of a name.

Creepier still to have creepy followers who are willing to listen to their creepy shite. And worse, disseminate said creepy shite.

Creepy.

And every time they post, H will be all rubby.

Gorgonemilezola · Today 12:49
Celebitchy IS a cult - as are the SS, as has been said often before. Their behaviour disgusts and frightens me - because of the insight it gives into just how vicious and bullying humans can be.

When I read what's written on there (for research purposes only, mind) I feel an actual physical sensation in the pit of my stomach - absolute revulsion, similar to the feeling I'd get if I witnessed a violent act in real life. They are sick, sick people on that site.

TicTacToes · Today 11:23
Kaiser is right about this:

I'm not going to click on Celebitchy.

I hope you'll enlighten us as to how Kaiser explains away Venus's daggers stare at Meghan (not Harry, interestingly). I think she's got her number! But yes - how does Kaiser spin that? Because it would take some doing.

Also, anyone who watches the video of the entourage leaving the auditorium can see and hear the anger it caused. There's jeering, cat-calls, boos and shouted insults. Anyone claiming not to hear this definitely has their own agenda, or is as brain-washed at Kaiser's subjects.

It must have been traumatic, especially for Harry, who I understand at least had the decency to feel embarrassed about the award.

So what is it that you admire about H&M?
Also, what are your thoughts on their future relationship with the RF?

Of course, I can well understand the reluctance to click. I take a walk on the wilder side at times to remind myself how nutty and nasty things can get online. It’s so short a piece of writing I will post some of it here. Her misspelled ‘Zapruder’ is there too. The article is one of her tamer pieces. Some replies included below also to her writing. Why she calls herself Kaiser, the German word for emperor, tells one all one needs to know about her disposition.

I found Meghan and Venus standing at the 30mark. Blink and you might miss it. I also noted that when the veterans were on stage, being roundly applauded and cheered, that the camera picked up Pat Tillman’s widow. She was tearful and it showed on her face. #InvictusSupporter

ESPN video:

Kaiser:

“As the camera pans to Harry as he walks up to the stage, you can see Venus in the corner of the frame, starting to stand up. At the 35-second mark, I’m pretty sure that’s the back of Venus’s head too – she’s super-tall and yes, it appears that she’s standing. I can’t believe I have to do this like the Zapruter film, but someone issued talking points and tried to use Venus’s name to bash Harry, so here we are.

While Harry and Meghan are much closer to Serena Williams, they’re obviously cool with the whole Williams-Ohanian fam. Harry and Alexis Ohanian are friends and the Sussexes were obviously seated in Serena’s section – you can see Alexis, Olympia and Jill Smoller (Serena’s agent) seated behind Harry and Meghan, and Venus and Harry were seated beside each other for a reason. Don’t let people use Venus’s name to attack Harry.”

A selection of replies:

Reply:

“…Venus turned to look at Meghan’s reaction in a sweet way, as Harry was walking to the stage. And then Venus turned toward the stage and rose to her feet, clapping. WTF is wrong with these weirded out desperados?! Neither Venus, Serena, Meghan, nor Harry got time for this a’hole nonsense. They all booked, busy, unbothered, and T-H-R-I-V-N-G 🤑 💅🏼 babieee! 🫳🏽 🕳 ✊🏽”

Reply:

“Whether you are supporting or defending, if you have to do silly things like, grasp at straws, twist yourself into pretzels, make shite up out of whole cloths, or crawl on the floor for crumbs, you have lost. That folks, is pretty much where Harry’s jealous haters are right now. And I’m loving it.
And, for all the online idiots who want to claim the standing was because the vets were there giving the award, they were applauded and then people started standing when PH walked up. All these tools have to lie and make things up to try to downplay PH’s popularity in any way they can…”

Reply:

“…they’re just relying on the stupidity of the readers. It’s actually very clever to figure out how to make a resounding success look like a failure – they’re masters at propaganda.”

Reply:

“…People who don’t care one way or the other about Harry will hear “Venus snubbed Harry,” they’ll internalize it and move on. They’re not going to bother asking “does this make sense?” If anything, they might have read about the “controversy” and this added thing about Venus is confirmation. That’s the interesting thing about propaganda – it’s not about convincing the haters.”