Hates Sites

[TicTacToes]

I’m very interested to know whether sites that are clearly pro Meghan and Harry are now considered ‘hate’ sites when they publish opinion pieces supportive of either of them. A case in point being Celebitchy where I’ve taken a gander at the articles which seem supportive of H and M and other celebrities, the latest article is kinda supportive of Taylor Swift. I see it’s been around for donkeys. Some of the comments, however, posted by people seem out there and I do not get the humour at all. Overall, it seems the ‘working’ British Royals are not thought well of so it may also have a Republican strain running through it. Anyway, be interested to know if there is a history to be aware of as I do not like hate sites and if this is rabidly communist or fascist it should be flagged up as such.

Oh gosh I think I've said before most people don't read this style of posting with links and copied text. It tends to just be too boring. 🤷‍♀️

I pulled out the relevant bits to support what I was saying. And offered up the links. You don’t have to read any of it. My thoughts are in normal text. If that helps you.

Yes, I agree - there's really very little foundation to the rumours about W and C, and I find that (on MN at least) those more sympathetic to W and C are far less willing to repeat internet rumours about H & M's relationship than the other way around! Wonder what this says about these demographics...

To make it more easier for the poster who didn’t like the style of that particular post of mine when I responded to this - There is one rule for William and another for Harry.

————

And, on here, I’ve noticed that any speculation about the longevity of Harry and Meghan’s marriage and predictions of their future divorce is poured over and added to by certain posters, yet when a poster speculates on another royal couple’s marriage there are howls of outrage and pile ons, and ‘disgustings’ etc.

Both couples have children that can be hurt by media and sm speculation of their parents’ marriages but apparently one couple and one couple’s children matter more than the other.

Or William wasn't dumb enough to get himself photographed naked in Vegas, a location in the US where we give f-all about UK press rules.

Not to mention all the stories about Harry in the military, harassing that musician, etc. that came out much later. I think a large part of the UK public's anger towards Harry ( I'm just a humble American so can be disregarded) is because such a false positive was painted of him by the UK press. Then he wrote Spare. And the real Harry revealed himself.

Really?

I’ve seen thread after thread after thread started by people who clearly loathe them both but for some reason keep extensive dossiers on them and can cite every trashy article going back years. Balanced nuanced thinkers aren’t doing that.

Pointing out how deranged this is tends to get comments deleted.

@DeftLemonDog I don't need any help thanks. There are some posters that I automatically skip over as I basically know what it will say and it just takes up too much space on my phone. This style of post with so many links is one that's been seen here so many times previously and my brain just says "skip".

"Both couples have children that can be hurt by media and sm speculation of their parents’ marriages but apparently one couple and one couple’s children matter more than the other."

This is just not the case on here but then I don't read other sources so no idea if you are referring perhaps to those. I won't repost the disgusting things that have been said on HERE about the Prince and Princess of Wales. It would be an extensive list and is far more explicit and detailed shall we say than the posters who say things like "I doubt H will still be married by then".

PrincessMee

There are some posters that I automatically skip over as I basically know what it will say and it just takes up too much space on my phone.

Oh God, me too.
They bang on and on with multiple links like what they've got to say is so important and will make such a difference...
Generally boils down to "H&M yay!".
Most of us have real lives to be getting on with - I spend too much time on MN as it is without struggling through yards of inanity.

If I recall I think it's to do with the fact they have many subs to various outlets.

@DeftLemonDog

Were BP/KP responsible for what Harry wrote in Spare, among other things potentially making identifiable (in cruel and disparaging terms) the school Matron he bullied and the girl he lost his virginity to? Did the men in grey suits draft the comment about viewing the people he killed as "chess pieces"?

Did they actually force him to use a racial slur (which he later apologised for) against one of his army comrades? Did they suggest it would be a good idea for him to engage in a game of naked pool? Actually, that's a poor example, as most people seemed to find it quite funny and the result of high spirits, me included.

There is much more. You can blame the dark forces of the Palace machinery all you want, but seriously suggesting any criticism Harry gets is down to that rather than his own words and actions is risible.

Very true. The obsessive negativity is asinine. Harry and Meghan are subject to all manner of negative comments on this site. Unable to move on certain posters rake over the coals of the past trying to make flames. It doesn’t work. There are millions of fans of the pair worldwide. A solid support base outside of the Sussex Squad that are attacked because some people find it unbearable that the two of them garner such passionate defence. Prince Harry will weather the storm. His growth and strength rooted in a solid family base now. The RF suffer from a moral turpitude and media obsessed sickness. It’s been called out. The people know.

I doubt the daft pair have millions of supporters anywhere. Most people aren't interested in the pair of self absorbed nincompoops.

But you don't have anything to say about the rabid Sussex Squad, Harry and Megan's main support. Because they're indefensible?

You seem to gloss over the fact that the negativity Harry and Meghan receive on this site is pretty much down to their own deeds and words and nowt to do with the royal family or anyone else.

Yeah, you haven’t been here that long. There was plenty of anti-Sussex sentiment on here, just like every other social media site.

DeftLemonDog · Today 00:19

I've always found H's dissing of the Palace and the 'men in grey' particularly ironic when you consider how a nice, friendly, fun persona was created for him by these perceived enemies.

We now discover that he's actually a miserable, entitled, moaning, not very bright spoiled brat capable of casual racism and actual physical assault, not to mention shouting at palace staff when he or Meghan didn't get their own way when they snapped their fingers.

I think Harry has a lot to thank the Palace 'machine' and the men in grey for.

Maybe - but situations and stories develop over time.

I was a massive fan of Meghan and Harry at the time of their wedding, like many people. I was disappointed when they threw in the towel but since then, both what's emerged about their behaviour and what I've read, seen and heard about them (from their own mouths!) has made me realise what nasty, calculating, manipulative and entitled people they both are - prepared to destroy others for their own purposes, and running a vile pack of attack dogs known as the Sussex Squad.

Likewise cantata

What is the phrase that is oft touted on MN?

‘When someone shows you who they are, believe them’?

I didn’t need much convincing.

I believe.

💯 no doubt at all. It’s very obvious.

It’s hysterical how they want so badly to believe them to be nothing. The opposite is true. I think more of Harry now than I did before, he has grown so much.

Unable to move on certain posters rake over the coals of the past trying to make flames.

Why only the other day, some were posting about Prince Phillip’s childhood. And the late Queen’s childhood. Princess Anne in her younger years.

And Queen Victoria.

You are right. It didn’t work.

Harry knew the dirty games being played. After the South Africa tour Willy contacted his brother asking him if he would like to meet according to one royal expert from The Times. And Harry was initially open but wanted to know who Willy was going to tell if he did come over. Willy referenced his private secretary and Harry was - don’t come over then. If staff knew it would leak. Says it all really that you will not just pop over in the evening quietly without being so rigid and a d%ck about it. Who needs to tell their private secretary, they were in walking distance from one another. Also Harry was the most popular royal in those days and Willy must have hated that especially after the brilliant tour of South Africa.

Harry knows where all the bodies are buried and has heaps of texts which he has not revealed. Remarkably restrained considering Willy the heir likes to throw his weight around. Disgusting behaviour from someone who is supposed to be king one day. I hope Charles III stays around until he is 100 years old and then we have a vote on who should be head of state.

Mmm - I don't think you find it hysterical.

I think you find it uncomfortable because it's becoming harder and harder for their supporters to defend. H & M's narrative is wearing very thin and they're being driven to more and more desperate measures and I, for one, think you can see that on their faces. Harry looked panic-stricken at the ESPY event and Meghan had a rictus grin (esp when Venus was side-eyeing her) which I thought was an attempt to put on a brave face when she knew things weren't going well.

And they skidaddled early, didn't they? I wonder why. Still seeking an answer to that little mystery.

What is with the very familiar use of silly names?

There is no need.

i suspect there are far more burial sites linked to Harry. And quite possibly Meghan.

The only person throwing their weight around has been Harry. And as such, he is now a figure of ridicule for many.

He could (they could) have had it all.

Going early for good reason? Understandable. I’m sure a lot of us have had to make a polite and early departure due to circumstances outwith our control.

This just wasn’t that.

Nevermetaghostididntlike, we don't know anything - as Harry continually reminds everyone, his memory is faulty, and what he says is His truth rather than The truth - and we know there's a chasm between the two.

Harry has 'heaps of texts that he's not revealed'? Firstly, how do you know this?
Secondly why do you think he hasn't revealed them? Possibly because they don't show Harry in a particularly good light? Or maybe he's blackmailing his family with the content.? If so, they're not falling for it.

As for William 'throwing his weight arounf' - the only person doing that is Harry. William pulled Harry and Meghan up about their treatment of staff (as did the late Queen). What was Harry and Meghan's behaviour like that he needed to do that?

Referring to William as 'Willy' is straight out of the Squaddies playbook. Well done you.

And as for rictus grin?

I’m not entirely sure that is intentional.

Sadly, like many people lately, the veneers (or whatever they are) are too big for her features.

It is a disconcerting look.

More so when they both looked so very strained. Maybe even they both realised that the award should have gone to someone else.