Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Nigeria?

1000 replies

MaturingCheeseball · 28/04/2024 18:32

Can this be true? That Harry and Meghan are off on a “royal” trip to Nigeria? What’s the game now? My head is spinning!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
65
IsoldeWagner · 04/05/2024 10:09

Interesting. Thank you.

AliceOlive · 04/05/2024 10:13

It’s blowing my mind that we didn’t have access to any of this a decade ago? The accuracy will only improve. It seems like a major wrong could be righted by people having a way to find out, even generally, where in African their ancestors lived.

I am doing my own ancestry research and it means so much to me.

JSMill · 04/05/2024 10:14

My dcs are mixed ethnicity. When ds1 did an ancestry dna test, he got a significant percentage of 'north African' DNA. He found that rather vague and when he dug into that, he found that they didn't have enough samples from that part of the world on the database to be more specific. However, the white British dna part was very specific eg central Scotland, North west England. Therefore perhaps the DNA test is only returning a general 'Nigeria' for a similar reason.

IsoldeWagner · 04/05/2024 10:18

JSMill · 04/05/2024 10:14

My dcs are mixed ethnicity. When ds1 did an ancestry dna test, he got a significant percentage of 'north African' DNA. He found that rather vague and when he dug into that, he found that they didn't have enough samples from that part of the world on the database to be more specific. However, the white British dna part was very specific eg central Scotland, North west England. Therefore perhaps the DNA test is only returning a general 'Nigeria' for a similar reason.

That's interesting.
It must be sample dependent.

AliceOlive · 04/05/2024 10:21

@JSMill That’s what the paper above said. I think the same regional results are being returned for all of the Americas. Which is strange because only 388,000 Africans were brought to US out of 12+ million that were kidnapped from various places in African

IcedPurple · 04/05/2024 11:16

AliceOlive · 04/05/2024 09:55

Sorry for the terrible typos.

Perhaps unusual to have the ancestry that Doria must have for Meghan to receive a 43% result.

But maybe not. Point is that the Nigeria result is common. I think the accuracy and detail will evolve over time. I also think it’s incredible for African Americans to be able to access to this information. It should be celebrated.

Meghan is of presumably entirely European ancestry on the Markle side.

Her mother is obviously African American, but the average ADOS has only about 73% African DNA. Doria does appear to have at least some white admixture. So it's hard to see how Meghan could have 43% 'Nigerian DNA', whatever that actually means.

notimagain · 04/05/2024 11:21

smilesy · 04/05/2024 08:17

The Boeing stuff is mainly about how Boeing have been cutting corners in terms of production standards and thus compromising the safety of their aircraft. Obviously it’s a huge scandal but it’s not really the same in terms of affecting Nigeria as the oil companies and their pollution.
I think a bigger concern is that fact that Russia and China have commercial and military influence there. So it’s entirely possible that both these countries would see Harry visiting as a propaganda opportunity or something 🤷‍♀️

@smilesy

The Boeing stuff is mainly about how Boeing have been cutting corners in terms of production standards and thus compromising the safety of their aircraft.

Exactly, it’s on going discussion/investigation, much much publicized, much followed by those that follow that sort of thing, much debated, has even caused the odd thread on Mumsnet, but stuff all relevance to this debate..I think the most recent event was introduced into the thread simply to allow another “Ah but Boeing”…

it’s a huge scandal but it’s not really the same in terms of affecting Nigeria as the oil companies and their pollution.

Agreed.

BemusedAmerican · 04/05/2024 12:00

Half of my large family and I got our DNA done by 2 companies about 6 years ago. We periodically have our DNA updated as the companies get more samples. The companies pinpointed the exact city of my paternal grandparents after few years. My brother and I showed general Scandinavian ancestry but last year we had first the country, then the city pinpointed. My sisters don't show any Scandinavian ancestry but our ancestral country of origin was invaded quite often so the DN A results seem accurate when you look at a chronological timeline of invasions.

AutumnCrow · 04/05/2024 14:44

Happy to explain more about what I find interesting about the Boeing - Invictus - Nigeria connections later. I thought I had done in earlier posts on the thread from a couple of days ago but appreciate that not everyone reads the full thread or follows it in that much detail. And I've learned some more about Boeing in Nigeria.

The DNA stuff is fascinating. I'm from an ethnic minority population where there aren't enough existing samples for, say, Ancestry.com to get close to my not-very-big-relatively-speaking country of birth let alone locale.

Runnerinthenight · 04/05/2024 17:02

AnnieSF · 03/05/2024 18:52

I forgot the image

That dress is hideous!

OneHeartySnail · 04/05/2024 20:46

It is great that people who have had their heritage and history deliberately destroyed have a way of reconstructing that history.

Also important that the limitations of the reconstruction - under current circumstances - are recognised. Otherwise you create, for understandable reasons, a potentially false alternative history.

PigglyWigglyOhYeah · 04/05/2024 21:18

Runnerinthenight · 04/05/2024 17:02

That dress is hideous!

It's a real shocker. Must be the look she was after though, what with her attention to detail and all.

smilesy · 04/05/2024 22:36

PigglyWigglyOhYeah · 04/05/2024 21:18

It's a real shocker. Must be the look she was after though, what with her attention to detail and all.

Quite. I really don’t get this attention to detail thing. Problems with the bridesmaids dresses not fitting, many frocky horror shows, jam all over the place, incomplete Netflix and Spotify output. Her definition of attention to detail wouldn’t pass muster with most people 🤷‍♀️

edited typos

MrsFinkelstein · 05/05/2024 12:57

NoisySnail · 02/05/2024 14:52

It was the fault of the Royal Family and their aides. None of them recognise how things will look to the public.
The footballer present moved along the wire fence and spoke to children at a point where there was a large hole in the fence so it was only waist height. He recognised how photos would look and took aversive action.
William and Catherine on the jeep recreating the Queen and Philips visit was a full on colonial look and should never have happened.
The firing on camera should have been foreseen. The Royal Family treat these countries as photo opportunities and largely ignore what the inhabitants of the countries think. There were large local demonstrations against them, the Royal Family just pretended they did not exist.
They asked to meet with Bob Marleys family and they refused so they posed next to a cut out of Bob Marley instead.
It was totally foreseeable.

If you're going to state things, then at least be accurate.

It just makes you look a bit deluded tbh.

Nigeria?
Nigeria?
Nigeria?
Nigeria?
BemusedAmerican · 05/05/2024 13:26

She's also forgetting the photos of Meghan in a ball gown, a row of empty seats behind her filled with water bottles, ignored by happy people in shorts munching on popcorn. She obviously wasn't at the VIP party at the Marley movie opening.

FloofyBear · 05/05/2024 13:27

@smilesy - I agree - this thing about her having some sort of obsessive attention to detail is constantly being proven to be the opposite

MrsDanversGlidesAgain · 05/05/2024 13:46

FloofyBear · 05/05/2024 13:27

@smilesy - I agree - this thing about her having some sort of obsessive attention to detail is constantly being proven to be the opposite

And frankly, obsessive attention to detail is a curse rather than a blessing (recovering perfectionist speaking). It can prevent you getting anything done. MM seems to be exactly the opposite - rushing into projects that seem like a good idea with not even the basics of planning done.

BasiliskStare · 05/05/2024 14:13

@AutumnCrow that is interesting and shame on me - it takes your own DNA and enough to see where you are from - so I can see that Nigeria ( which is quite large ) would probably ? ) come up as a place with enough to place your relatives rather than particular Nigerian tribes but not enough data to to say Yoruba for example etc is your ancestry.

MaturingCheeseball · 05/05/2024 14:48

I should think that as a rule of thumb descendants are from coastal areas. The African continent is vast so trading/buying of people took place from tribes located near to ship docking sites. A tribe from inland would have had to trek people a very long distance and probably would not have even heard that such trading was a possibility.

Think of press gangs in Britain. Only fellows from, say, Portsmouth were bopped over the head and brought onto ship. No one could have been bothered to head inland to do this.

OP posts:
IsoldeWagner · 05/05/2024 15:28

MaturingCheeseball · 05/05/2024 14:48

I should think that as a rule of thumb descendants are from coastal areas. The African continent is vast so trading/buying of people took place from tribes located near to ship docking sites. A tribe from inland would have had to trek people a very long distance and probably would not have even heard that such trading was a possibility.

Think of press gangs in Britain. Only fellows from, say, Portsmouth were bopped over the head and brought onto ship. No one could have been bothered to head inland to do this.

Good points, but of course the Arabs traded slaves over quite a wide area.
They traded slaves before that with the Vikings of course, during the Medieval Islamic Empire, so there may well be some interesting ancestry there.

VelcroCat · 05/05/2024 16:54

MaturingCheeseball · 05/05/2024 14:48

I should think that as a rule of thumb descendants are from coastal areas. The African continent is vast so trading/buying of people took place from tribes located near to ship docking sites. A tribe from inland would have had to trek people a very long distance and probably would not have even heard that such trading was a possibility.

Think of press gangs in Britain. Only fellows from, say, Portsmouth were bopped over the head and brought onto ship. No one could have been bothered to head inland to do this.

Watch the Michael Palin prog on Nigeria. It is very interesting about the slave trading and how it worked.

OneHeartySnail · 05/05/2024 17:27

From what I remember from one of my history degree modules, there was a well established trans-Sahara slave trade, as well as economic systems involving slavery in West Africa, when the trans-Atlantic slavers arrived.

Trans-Atlantic chattel slavery was far more violent and appalling.

But it did build on an existing, pre-European, network of slavery

garlicandsapphires · 05/05/2024 17:29

Is it true that there was a colour theme ( red white blue) at the Commonwealth service?

IsoldeWagner · 05/05/2024 17:32

garlicandsapphires · 05/05/2024 17:29

Is it true that there was a colour theme ( red white blue) at the Commonwealth service?

Which service, the last one?
A colour scheme for who?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.