<hollow laugh>
Self-serving? Meghan Markle? Never!
The ONLY reason for the delay is because it would have reflected poorly on MM. A bad ROI for her. None of this has anything to do with the kids or the hospital; I would go so far as to say that none of the charitable endeavours MM has been connected to in the public's eye, have been about the charity first and her second. I cannot think of a single effort where she didn't stand to gain something. She's in her early 40s. By her age, I (an ordinary person) had a years-long track record with 1 charity in the UK and a non-profit in the USA. I can't think of a single one MM has been involved in with any longevity. Even Harry has Well Child, Invictus etc. I may be proven wrong, maybe on her deathbed we will hear about an amazingly selfless endeavour she's undertaken. I promise to eat my hat if we do.
I don't think people outside the California-based celebrity scene can fathom just how amazingly well-run and slick and complex the PR and publicity machine is, just how greedy and ugly and self-obsessed the celebrities are, just how very much it's ALL about money and power. These people jeopardise their physical and mental health, their friendships and family relationships, their integrity, their dignity for fame and money. It's my very unfashionable opinion that they're all "off" in some way or another. Normal people can't take it. They leave. Some of them before they make it, some after they've made it. A tiny handful get so much money and power they're in a position to set the rules. Meghan Markle, with her solitary few million dollars in the bank (in a county where her entire fortune is what some people earn in a year on one of many tax-efficient investment accounts) is trying to scrabble her way to the very top of that world, and the main thing she has going for her is her marriage to Harry. But she's so entry-level - what the young people call "basic" - she just doesn't register with those who wield power. She's like a 40-something year old intern with not very good ideas. I do absolutely admire her stubbornness and determination, and she has very definitely been on the receiving end of a lot of online awfulness - relentless battering, day in and day out. I couldn't deal with it, personally (I don't think I know anyone who could, who could be bothered, who would think it worthwhile etc). But, if you lie with dogs, you get fleas. To bastardise one of her own phrases, she's not just lying with dogs, she's willingly feeding herself to dogs.